his teaching and preaching, as was obiected agaynst hym by one Richard Nele, Priest: who among other witnesses, deposed agaynst hym for preachyng in the towne of Wylsedone,
This refers to Bilney's preaching tour of 1527 (Willesden, Newington and Ipswich) in which he spoke against images. For commentary, see Christopher Haigh, English Reformations: Religion, Politics, and Society under the Tudors (Oxford, 1993), p. 63.
MarginaliaEx Registro Lond. fol. 82.Put away your golden Gods, your siluer Gods, your stony Gods, and leaue your offerings, and lift vp your hartes to the Sacrament of the aultar. Also the sayd M. Bilney sayd in his Sermon: MarginaliaBilney agaynst offeringes to Images.I know certaine thinges haue bene offered in such places, which haue bene afterward giuen to whores of the stewes: and I call theē whores of the stewes, that be naught of their liuyng. &c. Ex Regist.
Foxe is quoting Guildhall Library, Register Tunstall, 9531/10, fol. 82, but also see Thomas More, 'The confutation of Tyndale's answer', ed. by Louis A Schuster, Richard C Marius and James P Lusardi, The Yale Edition of the Complete Works of St. Thomas More, viii/1-3 (New Haven, 1973), 1, pp. 22-5.
Item, by an other witnes named W. Cade, it was deposed agaynst hym,
William Cade, monk of Ipswich, testified that Bilney had criticised the greed, idolatry and sexual incontinence of the monks.
Item, by the sayd deponent agaynst Bilney: That the Priestes take away the offerynges, and hange them about their whores neckes: and after that, they take them agayne from the whores, if they please them not, and hange them vpon the Images: and is not that a great relicke, when it is hanged there agayne?
[Back to Top]Itē, by þe said deponēt it was testified against Bilney: MarginaliaBilney against pilgrimage.That goyng on pilgremage is naught,
Pilgrimages were one of those practices hated by evangelical reformers in that it implied that man's own actions could increase merit in degradation of the one time for all time sacrifice of Christ on the cross.
Item, by W. Nelmys of Wylsedone,
Bilney had preached in the town in 1527.
Item, by Tho. Daly of Wilsedone, that Bilney thus preached: You come hyther on pilgrimage to stockes and stones. You do naught: kepe you at home, and worship the Sacrament at home. &c.
Item, by Frier Iohn Hogekyn, that Bilney thus preached at Ipsewych: The cōmyng of our Sauiour Christ was long desired, and by diuers & many Prophets prophecied, that he should come. But Iohn the Baptiste, more then a Prophet, did not onely prophecie, but with his finger shewed: Beholde the Lambe of God that taketh away the sinnes of the world.
John Huggen was a witness to Bilney's sermon at St George's chapel, Ipswich. Bilney had preached against salvation by works, referring to the one time for all time sacrifice of Christ on the cross and related doctrine of sola fideism. The idea being that to suggest salvation depends on any additional earned merits denigrates that original sacrifice. Bilney was arrested here.
[Back to Top]This refers to the medieval practice of wrapping the dead in Franciscan cowls before burial as a means of increasing merit - See, Susan Wabuda, Preaching during the English reformation (Cambridge, 2002), pp. 108, 122-39.
Itē, by an other Frier Iulles, that Bilney thus preached, I trust there shall and will come other beside me, the whiche shall shew and preache to you the same fayth, and maner of liuing that I do: MarginaliaVid. supr. pag. 1138.whiche is the very true Gospell of our Sauiour, whereby you shall bee brought from your errours, wherein you haue bene long seduced: for before this, there hath bene many, that hath sclaundered you, and the Gospell of our Sauiour Christ. Of whō speaketh our Sauiour Christ Mat. 18. Qui scandalizauerit vnum de pusillis istis qui crediderunt. &c.
[Back to Top]Adde moreouer to these, the testimonie of Richard Seman: that Bilney in Ipswitch should preache these wordes: MarginaliaBilney agaynst moe Mediatours then one.Our Sauiour Christ is our Mediatour betwene vs & the father: what then should nede vs to seke to any Saint for remedy, inferiour to Christ? Wherfore to make such petitiō to any, but to our Sauiour Christ, trusting therby to haue remedye, doth greate iniurye to the bloud of Christ, and deformeth our Sauiour Christ: like as, if a man should take, and strike of the head, and set it vnder the foote, and to set the foote aboue.
[Back to Top]Thus much beyng partly touched before, I thought here to insinuate agayn out of the Registers, touching the opinions of Thomas Bilney.
This is Guildhall Library, Register Tunstall, 9531/10.
There are documents which purport to be written by Bilney, for which, see PRO, SP 1/66, fols. 296-317 (or L&P, v, no. 372 (1-3).
This can be found earlier, on page 1137 [Foxe, 1570 edition] and is Bilney's answer to the third objection against him.
Moreouer, concernyng the authoritie of the keys, thus he writeth, aunsweryng to his. 12. Article: Soli sacerdotes ordinati ritè per pontifices, habent claues, quarum virtute ligant & soluunt Marginalia* At hæc clæuis errat perperno.(* claue non errante) quod & facere eos non dubito, quamlibet sint peccatores. Nam Sacramētorum efficaciam non minuit, nedum tollit ministrorum indignitas, q̃diu ab ecclesia tolerantur. &c.
Guildhall Library, Register Tunstall, 9531/10, fol. 137.
By these woordes of Bilney written by hym in Latine, although it may bee thought how ignoraunt and grosse he was after the rudenes of those dayes: yet by the same notwithstandyng it may appeare, how falsely he is noted and sclaūdered by M. More, and Cope my frende, to haue recanted the Articles, which he did neuer holde or mainteine otherwise in all his lyfe.
This refers to Nicolas Harpsfield's treatise, Dialogi sex contra summi Pontificatus, monasticae vitae, sanctorum, sacrarum imaginum oppugnatoreset pseudomartyrs (Antwerp, 1566), which was itself very critical of Foxe's original 1563 edition. It was Harpsfield who raised More's conclusions about Bilney's trials and second recantation at Norwich. For comments, see G R Elton, 'Persecution and Toleration in the English Reformation', in Studies in Church History, 21 (1984), pp. 163-84 (also published in Studies in Tudor and Stuart Politics and Government: Papers and reviews 1946-1972, ed. by G R Elton (Cambridge, 2003), pp. 175-98. For More's notation of Bilney's recantation, see Thomas More, 'The confutation of Tyndale's answer', ed. by Louis A Schuster, Richard C Marius and James P Lusardi, The Yale Edition of the Complete Works of St. Thomas More, viii/1-3 (New Haven, 1973), 1, pp. 22-5.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaContrary reasons to proue that Bilney did not againe recant.Now that I haue sufficiently (I trust) put of the reasons of M. More and of others, whereby they pretend falsely to face vs out, that Bilney the seconde tyme again recāted at his death:
The conclusion that More set out to prove that Bilney had made a second recantation is also the conclusion of Professor Guy, for which see J A Guy, The Public Career of Sir Thomas More (New Haven, 1980), p. 170.
MarginaliaProued by byshop Nixes wordes, that Bilney dyd not recant at hys burning.The like euidence we may also take by the verdite of þe Bishop him selfe, that burned hym: whose wordes were these. After he had burned him, and then heard tell of D. Shaxton: Christes mother, sayd he (that was his oth) I feare I haue burnt Abell, & let Cain go. &c.
In a sermon of 1531 (Ash Wednesday) Shaxton preached a sermon in which he suggested that while it was permissible to doubt purgatory it was illicit to give voice to these doubts, after which he was carefully watched. For discussion, see Alec Ryrie, The Gospel and Henry VIII: Evangelicals in the Early English Reformation (Cambridge, 2003), p. 72; Peter Marshall, Religious Identities In Henry VIII's England (Aldershot, 2006), p. 173; Susan Wabuda, 'Shaxton, Nicholas (c.1485-1556)', ODNB (2004).
[Back to Top]