MarginaliaAn. 1554. Aprill.which you haue right learnedly satisifed: and now all thinges being done, after our forme and maner, wee wyll end this disputation, saying: In oppositum est sacra theologia. In oppositum est. &c.
¶ Thus ye haue heard in these foresayd disputations, about the holy supper of the Lord, the reasons and argumentes of the Doctors, the aunsweres and resolutions of the Bishops, and the triumph of the Prolocutor, triumphing before the victory: with Vicit veritas: who rather in my mynde should haue exclamed: Vicit potestas. As it happeneth alwayes, vbi pars maior vincit meliorem. For els of potestas had not helped the Prolocutor more then Veritas, there had bene a small victoria. But so it is, where iudgementes bee partiall, and parties be addicted, there all things turne to victory, though it be neuer so meane and simple, as in this disputation myght well appeare. For first of the Opponents part, neyther was there almost any argument in true moode and figure rightly framed: neyther could the aunsweres be permitted to say for themselues: and if they answered any thing, it was condemned before they began to speake. Agayne, such disturbance and confusion, more like a conspiration then any disputation, without all forme and order, was in the Schooles during the time of their aunswering, that neither could the aunswerers haue place to vtter theyr myndes, neyther would the Opponentes bee satisfied wyth any reason. Concerning the which disturbance of that misruled disputation, you shall heare what maister Ridley hym selfe reporteth by his own description in maner as followeth.
[Back to Top]In the 1570 edition, rather than following the disputations with a digest of the arguments, Foxe moved Ridley's letter protesting about the conduct of the disputations from the beginning of Ridley's account of his disputation to the end of Foxe's account of all the disputations (textual transposition 17).
[Back to Top]In the Rerum and the 1563 edition, Foxe had printed all the material after Ridley's narrative of his disputation in the order in which it occurred in the manuscripts: first Ridley's prefatory letter (Rerum, pp. 659-61; 1563, pp. 956-58), followed by the disputation itself (Rerum, p. 661-95; 1563, p. 957-77), further followed by Ridley's letter to Weston (Rerum, p 695; 1563, p. 977) and a concluding letter addressed to the reader (Rerum, p. 696; 1563, p. 978).
[Back to Top]In later editions, Foxe transposed the sections of Ridley's account. Phrases were appended to Ridley's letter of protest in the 1570 edition which had not appeared in the Rerum or the 1563 edition (or in LM, pp. 76-78, where it was also printed; see textual variant 69). By this time, Foxe had several different manuscript copies of this letter - Harley 422, fol. 53r-v; Lansdowne 389, fols. 117v-118v and ECL 262, fols. 16r-17v - and it is possible that this new conclusions appears in one of these. Alternatively, it might have been invented by Foxe. Conversely, closing passages in Ridley's prefatory letter, which had served as a bridge between the letter and the account of his disputation, were omitted (see textual variant 70).
[Back to Top]This is a section consisting of letters written by Cranmer and Ridley and connecting text around the time of their separation and condemnation. Many of the glosses follow the texts in objecting to the conduct of the proceedings: haste, unfairness, unkept promises are all noted ('B. Ridleyes report of the misorder of this disputation', 'D. Ridley could not be suffered to read forth his protestation', 'Papistes haue small conscience in performing promises', 'The Archb. not suffered to aunswere fully to any argument' and 'Hast made in condemning the Archb. and hys fellowes'). The ill behaviour of the papists is also alluded to ('Tauntes and reuilinges vsed in this disputation'). Foxe's predilection for binaries is also in evidence: The gloss 'No veritie but glory sought for in this disputation' picks up on Ridley's contrast between the supposed object of the disputation (verity) and its actual one (glory), while the gloss reporting the condemnation of the three martyrs ('D. Cranmer Bishop Ridley and M. Latimer condemned') is immediately followed by one claiming that 'Weston geueth sentence against himselfe', thus showing the contrast between true and apparent guilt. Many of the glosses are factual, which is unsurprising given the transition from disputation to narrative that this passage marks (e.g. 'The Archb. and his fellow prisoners separated', 'Disputation in Cambridge intended'). For variations and errors between editions, see the gloss 'The 3. prisoners at Oxford called before the Commissioners. Aprill. 20.' (1570 more clearly positioned than later), 'Aprill. 13' (a mistake in all editions), and 'Disputation in Cambridge intēded, wherof read hereafter pag. 1639' (only 1570 bothers to give a reference).
[Back to Top]Moreouer, a great part of the time appointed for the disputations was vainely consumed in opprobrious checkes, and reuiling tauntes,MarginaliaTauntes and reuilinges vsed in thys disputation.with hissings & clapping of handes, and that in the english tonge to procure the peoples fauour withall. All which things, when I with great griefe of hart did behold, protesting openly that
[Back to Top]such excessiue and outragious disorder, was vnsemely for those Scholes & men of learning & grauitie, & that they which were the doers and stirrers of such thnges, dyd nothing els but bewray the slendernes of their cause, and their owne vanities: I was so far of by this my humble complainte from doing any good at all, that I was enforced to heare such rebukes, checkes, and tauntes for my labour, as no person of any honesty without blusshing could abide to heare the like spoken of a most vyle varlet, against a most wretched ruffian.
[Back to Top]At the first beginning of the disputation, when I should haue confirmed mine aūswere to the first proposition in few wordes, and that (after the maner and law of Scholes) afore I could make an end of my first probatiō, which was not very long, euē þe Doctours thēselues, cryed out, he speaketh blasphemies, he speaketh basphemies. MarginaliaD. Ridley could not be suffered to read forth hys protestation.And when I on my knees besought them & that hartely, that they would vouchsafe to heare me to þe end, (wherat the Prolocutor being moued, cried out on hie, let him read it, let him read it) yet when I began to read it againe, there followed immediatly such shouting, such a noyse and tumult, and confusion of voyces, crying, blasphemies, blasphemies, as I to my remembraunce, neuer heard or read the lyke: except it be that one which was in the Actes of the Apostles, stirred vp of Demetrius the siluer Smith and other of his occupation, crying out against Paul, great is Diana of þe Ephesians, great is Diana of the Ephesians: and except it be a certain disputatiō which the Arrians had agaynst the Orthodoxes, & such as were of godly iudgemēt in Aphrica, where it is sayd, that such as the President and rulers of the disputation were, such was the end of the disputations. All were in a hurlie burlie, and so great were the sclaūders which the Arrians cast out, that nothing could quietly be heard. This writeth Victor in the second booke of his history.
[Back to Top]The which cries and tumults of them agaynst me so preuailed, that wild I nild I, I was enforced to leaue of the reading of my probations, although they were short. If any man doubt of the truth hereof, let the same aske any one that was there, and not vtterlye peruerted in Popery: and I am assured hee wyll saye I speake the least. But to complayne of these thinges further, I wyll ceasse.
[Back to Top]And further speaking of this disputation, he concludeth with these wordes: And thus was ended thys most glorious disputation of the most holy fathers, sacrificers, Doctours, and Maisters, which fought most manfully (as ye may see) for their God and goods, for their fayth and felicitie, for their countrey and kitchin, for their beautie and bellie, with triumphant applauses and fauour of the whole Vniuersitie.
[Back to Top]After the disputation of Maister Latimer ended,
Foxe transposed a description of the condemnation of Cranmer, Ridley and Latimer from the first informant's account of the Oxford disputations (see textual transposition 6). These passages first appeared in the Rerum (pp. 704-05), demonstrating that Foxe had obtained the first informant's account while he was in exile. The description of the procession and of Latimer's reaction to it is particularly interesting. The identification of 'Augustine Cooper' (see 'Augustine Kyrke' - "Personal Identifications") as a catchpole was accurate and confirms the accuracy of the first informant and his status as an eyewitness.
[Back to Top]