Thematic Divisions in Book 11
1. The Martyrdom of Rogers 2. The Martyrdom of Saunders 3. Saunders' Letters 4. Hooper's Martyrdom 5. Hooper's Letters 6. Rowland Taylor's Martyrdom 7. Becket's Image and other events 8. Miles Coverdale and the Denmark Letters 9. Bonner and Reconciliation 10. Judge Hales 11. The Martyrdom of Thomas Tomkins 12. The Martyrdom of William Hunter 13. The Martyrdom of Higbed and Causton 14. The Martyrdom of Pigot, Knight and Laurence 15. Robert Farrar's Martyrdom 16. The Martyrdom of Rawlins/Rowland White17. The Restoration of Abbey Lands and other events in Spring 155518. The Providential Death of the Parson of Arundel 19. The Martyrdom of John Awcocke 20. The Martyrdom of George Marsh 21. The Letters of George Marsh 22. The Martyrdom of William Flower 23. The Martyrdom of Cardmaker and Warne 24. Letters of Warne and Cardmaker 25. The Martyrdom of Ardley and Simpson 26. John Tooly 27. The Examination of Robert Bromley [nb This is part of the Tooly affair]28. The Martyrdom of Thomas Haukes 29. Letters of Haukes 30. The Martyrdom of Thomas Watts 31. Mary's False Pregnancy32. Censorship Proclamation 33. Our Lady' Psalter 34. Martyrdom of Osmund, Bamford, Osborne and Chamberlain35. The Martyrdom of John Bradford 36. Bradford's Letters 37. William Minge 38. James Trevisam 39. The Martyrdom of John Bland 40. The Martyrdom of Frankesh, Middleton and Sheterden 41. Sheterden's Letters 42. Examinations of Hall, Wade and Polley 43. Martyrdom of Christopher Wade 44. Martyrdom of Carver and Launder 45. Martyrdom of Thomas Iveson 46. John Aleworth 47. Martyrdom of James Abbes 48. Martyrdom of Denley, Newman and Pacingham 49. Richard Hooke 50. Martyrdom of William Coker, et al 51. Martyrdom of George Tankerfield, et al 52. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Smith 53. Martyrdom of Harwood and Fust 54. Martyrdom of William Haile 55. George King, Thomas Leyes and John Wade 56. William Andrew 57. Martyrdom of Robert Samuel 58. Samuel's Letters 59. William Allen 60. Martyrdom of Roger Coo 61. Martyrdom of Thomas Cobb 62. Martyrdom of Catmer, Streater, Burwood, Brodbridge, Tutty 63. Martyrdom of Hayward and Goreway 64. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Glover 65. Cornelius Bungey 66. John and William Glover 67. Martyrdom of Wolsey and Pigot 68. Life and Character of Nicholas Ridley 69. Ridley's Letters 70. Life of Hugh Latimer 71. Latimer's Letters 72. Ridley and Latimer Re-examined and Executed73. More Letters of Ridley 74. Life and Death of Stephen Gardiner 75. Martyrdom of Webb, Roper and Park 76. William Wiseman 77. James Gore 78. Examinations and Martyrdom of John Philpot 79. Philpot's Letters 80. Martyrdom of Thomas Whittle, Barlett Green, et al 81. Letters of Thomas Wittle 82. Life of Bartlett Green 83. Letters of Bartlett Green 84. Thomas Browne 85. John Tudson 86. John Went 87. Isobel Foster 88. Joan Lashford 89. Five Canterbury Martyrs 90. Life and Martyrdom of Cranmer 91. Letters of Cranmer 92. Martyrdom of Agnes Potten and Joan Trunchfield 93. Persecution in Salisbury Maundrell, Coberly and Spicer 94. William Tyms, et al 95. Letters of Tyms 96. The Norfolk Supplication 97. Martyrdom of John Harpole and Joan Beach 98. John Hullier 99. Hullier's Letters 100. Christopher Lister and five other martyrs 101. Hugh Lauerocke and John Apprice 102. Katherine Hut, Elizabeth Thacknell, et al 103. Thomas Drury and Thomas Croker 104. Thomas Spicer, John Deny and Edmund Poole 105. Persecution of Winson and Mendlesam 106. Gregory Crow 107. William Slech 108. Avington Read, et al 109. Wood and Miles 110. Adherall and Clement 111. A Merchant's Servant Executed at Leicester 112. Thirteen Burnt at Stratford-le-Bow113. Persecution in Lichfield 114. Hunt, Norrice, Parret 115. Martyrdom of Bernard, Lawson and Foster 116. Examinations of John Fortune117. John Careless 118. Letters of John Careless 119. Martyrdom of Julius Palmer 120. Agnes Wardall 121. Peter Moone and his wife 122. Guernsey Martyrdoms 123. Dungate, Foreman and Tree 124. Martyrdom of Thomas More125. Examination of John Jackson126. Examination of John Newman 127. Martyrdom of Joan Waste 128. Martyrdom of Edward Sharpe 129. Four Burnt at Mayfield at Sussex 130. John Horne and a woman 131. William Dangerfield 132. Northampton Shoemaker 133. Prisoners Starved at Canterbury 134. More Persecution at Lichfield
Critical Apparatus for this Page
Commentary on the Text
Names and Places on this Page
Unavailable for this Edition
1761 [1722]

Quene Mary. The story of B. Farrar, with his first trouble in K. Edwardes dayes.

MarginaliaAn. 1555. March.tectour, was first called and promoted to that dignitie. This man I may well call twyse a Martyr, not onely for the cruell death of the fire which hee suffered most constantly in the daies of Queene Mary, vnto the sheeding of his bloud: but also for diuers other iniuries & molestations in K. Edwardes tyme, which he no lesse firmely, thē vnworthely susteined at þe hands of his enemies after the fall of the Duke of Somerset. Of these his vexations & troubles, wyth the wranglyng articles and informations layd against hym, Marginalia56. Articles agaynst B. Farrar in King Edwardes time, deuised by Tho. Yong, Constantine, and other his aduersaries.to the number of fiftie & sixe, and of the malice conceaued agaynst hym by certayne couetous Canons of the Church of Carmarthen, and what were the proceedings of both parts as well of the Innocent as of the craftie aduersaries, and what the names of these were (to wytte George Constantine, Dauid Walter his seruant, the Chaūter MarginaliaTho. Yong sonne in law to Constantine.sonne in law to Constantine, which was Tho. Yong,  

Commentary   *   Close

On 29 January 1561 Richard Pratt, a friend of the martyrologist, wrote to Foxe and asked him not to discuss Ferrar's feud with his canons as it would create scandal and encourage the catholics, particularly since Thomas Young was about to become archbishop of York (BL, Harley 416, fol. 170r-v). Foxe obliged to the extent of witholding the names of Meyricke and Young from his first edition. In the second edition, with both men dead, he supplied their names and even identified Meyricke ashaving been bishop of Bangor and Young as having been archbishop of York.

[Back to Top]
who was also afterward Archb. of Yorke, Rowland Mericke,  
Commentary   *   Close

On 29 January 1561 Richard Pratt, a friend of the martyrologist, wrote to Foxe and asked him not to discuss Ferrar's feud with his canons as it would create scandal and encourage the catholics, particularly since Thomas Young was about to become archbishop of York (BL, Harley 416, fol. 170r-v). Foxe obliged to the extent of witholding the names of Meyricke and Young from his first edition. In the second edition, with both men dead, he supplied their names and even identified Meyricke ashaving been bishop of Bangor and Young as having been archbishop of York.

[Back to Top]
who was afterward Byshop of Bangor, Thomas Lee, and Hugh Rawlyns. &c.) forsomuch as the full declaration thereof is at large expressed in our former edition, I wyll therefore referre the Reader to the perusing thereof. In the meane time for vs at this present (which seeke for breuitie as much as we may) cutting of all superfluities that may be otherwyse referred to our former edition, it shall suffice for this present briefly to touch the names of his principall aduersaries, with the effect and cause of the whole controuersie betwene him and them registred and witnessed by the sayd Byshop him selfe in order as followeth.

[Back to Top]
MarginaliaEx Registro.¶ Aduersaries principall against D. Farrar Bishop of S. Dauids. Videlicet.MarginaliaThe principall aduersaries agaynst B. Farrar in the dayes of K. Edward.

1Thomas Yong Chaunter of the Cathedrall
Church of S. Dauids.
2Rowlād Mericke Doctor of law, and Canon
resident of the same church.
3George Constantine, to whom the Bishop
gaue the office of Registership.

FIrst the Bishops aunswere vnto the first, second, third, fourth, and. xxxvj. MarginaliaOf these Articles read before in our former editiō of Actes and Monumentes pag. 1085.articles doth declare þe effect and controuersie betwene him & hys sayd aduersaries.

Item the sayd George Constantine beyng ioyned in friendship with hys sonne in law Tho. Yong aforesayd, and they both confederated with the said Rowlād Mericke, wyth diuers other their adherents, were the originall beginners of all this trouble and contention betwene the sayd Byshop and them, onely for their own wicked and most couetous behauiour MarginaliaThe vices of these aduersaries described.in spoyling the Cathedrall Church of Plate, Iewels, & other ornaments to a notable value, cōuerting it vnto theyr own vses, against the kinges right and to the vtter decay of the same church: also for omitting the Kynges Maiesties Iniunctions, and for cōmitting Simony and bribery, as is declared in the exceptions against the sayd Yong and Constantine: and furthermore for their abomination in manifest bearing wyth most wycked and vile liuers, as is declared in the bishops MarginaliaOf these aunsweres read more in our former edition of Actes and Monumentes. pag. 1088.aunswere to the xij. article. For which their ill demerites and wilfull persisting therein, and theyr most stubburne disobedience agaynst the sayd Bishop,  

Commentary   *   Close

Foxe does not supply any details of a quarrel which been festering between Ferrar and his canons long before this denunciation of Ferrar was sent to the privy council. Over a year before this document was written, Ferrar had suspended some of his leading opponents from their diocesan offices and they had appealed to the Council of the Marches. And along with the complaint made against Ferrar to the privy council, another complaint had been brought against Ferrar in the Court of Great Sessions in Carmarthen. (For the details of the feud between Ferrar and his canons, see Brown, pp. 82-185).

[Back to Top]
first with gentlenes seeking their reformation (whereunto they in no wyse would encline) and thinking then to feare them wyth the law (as the father doth feare the childe with shaking the rod) to make them obedient (through which attempt they became worse) at last he put them out of office.MarginaliaThe cause why these aduersaries were so styrred against Bish. Farrar.Sithens which time they haue bestowed all theyr wyt and cunning wythout ceassing, to inuent mischiefe agaynst the sayd bishop, seeking by all vniust meanes hys vtter vndoing, and finally hys death, as may appeare by theyr proceedinges.

[Back to Top]

Item the sayd Thomas Yong, Rowland Mericke, and George Constantine, to preuent the said bishop, who had (as they knew rightwell) iust and haynous

matter agaynst them, did most maliciously conceiue, diuise, procure, aswell the pretēsed matter of MarginaliaPremunire pretended agaisnt B. Farrar.Premunire  

Commentary   *   Close

This was originally a series of statutes enacted in 1353, 1365 and 1393, limiting appeals to the papacy by English clerics and prescribing penalties for those promoting a papal bull or excommunication in England. By Ferrar?s day it had come to be used as a legal term for any clerical usurpation of royal power or authority.

[Back to Top]
promoted by Roger Barloe, as also the false surmised articles promoted by Hugh Rawlins Priest, and Thomas Lee vnto the kinges high Counsell, minding therby vtterly to discredite and bring vnderfoote the said bishop, to the end that he should not be hable to prosecute any matter against them, whereby theyr wycked doinges myght be opened.

[Back to Top]

Item they are mayntayners & bearers of þe charges of Thomas Lee brother in lawe to George Constantine, vncle to the wyfe of the sayd Tho. Yong, and promoter of the sayd articles by them diuised, and came in for wytnesses vnto their own conceites.

Item, furthermore they obtayned a commission into the countrey for better proufe of the sayd articles,MarginaliaCommissiō procured agaynst B. Farrar by his aduersaries. by vertue of which commission, and also by colour therof they examined sixe score and seuen witnesses, and that very partially and vnlawfully, as appeareth in the generall exceptions hereafter ensuing: which great nūber of wytnesses did sound much in the Coūsels eares. Neuertheles it is proueable, that the one halfe at the least (of the sayd number) were defamed persons, and many of them haue bene punished for their demerites by the said bishop and hys officers, and therefore were the readier to witnes against him:MarginaliaCrafty packyng agaynst B. Farrar. as adulterers, fornicators, baudes, dronkadrs, braulers, fighters, theeues, runnagates, and beggers. And the more part of the sayd wytnesses are eyther kynsmen, familiar friendes, farmers of benefices, seruantes, or by some other meanes adherentes vnto the sayd aduersaries. And as for the honest Gentlemen and other which haue deposed vpon the sayd articles, they haue sayd nothing that can hurt the sayd bishop, as it is thought by such as haue seene the depositions. And thus much briefly touching the first trouble of B. Farrar in K. Edwardes tyme.

[Back to Top]

After that the foresayd M. Farrar bishop of S. Dauids had bene long deteined in custody vnder sureties in the raigne of king Edward (not for any iuste cause of hys part deserued, but by reason that he had ben promoted by þe Duke of Somerset, and now after his fall he found fewer frendes to supporte hym against such as hunted after hys bishopricke) at length after the decease of king Edward, MarginaliaThe secōd trouble of B. Farrar in the time of Queene Mary.by the comming in of Queene Mary the state of religion began to bee chaunged and altered. Whereby a new trouble rose vpon him, being now accused and examined, not for any matter of Premunire, but for hys fayth and doctrine. Whereupon he was called before the bishop of Winchester wyth M. Hooper, M. Rogers, M. Bradford, M. Saunders, & others aforesayd, the iiij. day of February. On the which day he should also with thē haue ben condēned: but because leysure or lyst dyd not so well then serue the bishop, his condemnation was differred, and he sēto to prison agayne, where he continued tyll the. 14. day of the sayd moneth of February. What his examinations and aunswers were before the sayd B. of Winchester, so much as remayned & came to our handes, I haue here annexed in maner as followeth.

[Back to Top]
¶ The aunswer of Robert Farrar B. of S. Dauids, before Winchester and others.  
Commentary   *   Close

This is not an official record but the account of an eyewitness. Judging from this account, this examination was unusually ad hominem, focusing not as much on doctrinal matters as on efforts to rattle Ferrar by alleging past misbehaviour to him.

MarginaliaThe talke of Byshop Farrar before the B. of Winchester and other Cōmissioners.AT hys first comming and kneeling before the Lord Chaūcellor, þe B. of Duresme, and þe B. of Worcester, who sat at the table, and Maister Rochester, Maister Southwell, maister Bourne and other standing at the tables ende, the Lord Chauncellor sayd vnto hym on thys sort.

[Back to Top]

Winch. Now Syr, you haue heard how the world goeth here.

Farrar. If it like your honour, I know not.

Winch. What say you? Do not you know thinges abroad, notwithstanding you are a prisoner?

Farrar. No my Lord, I know not.

Winch. Loe, what a froward fellow is this?

Farrar