MarginaliaAn. 1555. May.ctrines sake, that in his readyng they cut and mangled his gowne with their kniues. This Cardmaker being apprehended in the begynnyng of Queene Maryes reigne with M. Barlow Byshop of Bath, was brought to London
In August 1553, Cardmaker, together with William Barlow, the bishop of Bath and Wells, were apprehended while trying to flee England disguised as merchants (Machyn, p. 75 and APC IV, p. 321).
What Foxe means is that Cardmaker and Barlow were not charged with heresy because there was no law then in force against it. They were arrested for trying to leave the realm without royal permission.
There were technical meanings to the phrase 'ex officio' but here Foxe means it literally: the bishops now had offcial authority to proceed against Cardmaker and Barlow for heresy.
MarginaliaBarlow and Cardmaker acceptable of Winchester as catholickes.To this they both made such an aunswere,
Although Foxe had an official account of their examination (BL, Harley 421, fol. 39v), he is following the narrative he printed in the Rerum.
Foxe's account of what happened during the examination of Barlow and Cardmaker is tendentious. Barlow and Cardmaker did agree to recant (BL, Harley 421, fol. 39v; cf. Machyn, p. 75; Wriothesley II, p. 126 and OL, I, p. 171). Barlow recanted and was released from prison; he then fled into exile (Garrett). Cardmaker refused to recant as promised and was ultimately executed.
[Back to Top]To the same prison where Cardmaker was, Laurence Saunders was brought (after þe sentence of excōmunication & condemnation, was pronounced against hym) MarginaliaConference betwene Laurence Saunders, and Iohn Cardmaker.where these ij. prisoners had such Christian conference, that whatsoeuer the breath of the Byshops blustered, and the tickle eares of the people to lightly beleued,
Foxe is rather skillfully obscuring the fact that Cardmaker had promised to recant.
MarginaliaD. Martin writeth against Cardmaker.Doctour Martine, who bare also a part in those pageants, tooke vpon him to be the chief doer by writyng, whose long vnsauerie letters & simple reasons for transubstantiation, and such Papisticall trash, this Cardmaker aunswered largely, learnedly, and substancially, confutyng the same, openyng the falshode of his Argumentes, and deliueryng the sentences of the fathers (which Martin abused for his purpose) to their true vnderstandyng: which his aunsweres I woulde had come to our handes. Thus constantly abode this man of God all the enemies doings, as he did also the death which hee suffred in Smithfield in London. Wherof ye shall heare more anone: but first we will suruey þe matter and maner of his Articles obiected agaynst him by Byshop Boner, with his aunsweres annexed to the same, as consequently here vnder foloweth.
[Back to Top]The articles put to Cardmaker, and his answers to them, came from records of Bishop Bonner, probably a separate act book, now lost.
MarginaliaMay. 24. Articles ministred agaynst I. Cardmaker, by the Byshop of London.FIrst, I Edmund bishop of London, obiect against thee Syr Iohn Taylour alias Cardmaker, that thou wast and art of the citie and dioces of London, and so of the iurisdiction of me Edmund bishop of London.
Item, that thou in times past diddest professe the rule of S. Fraunces, and diddest by vow promise to keepe po-
uertie, chastitie, and obedience, according to the rule of S. Fraunces.MarginaliaIoh. Cardmaker first an obseruant Fryer.
Item that thou in times past diddest receyue al the orders of the church then vsed, to wyt, tam maiores, quam minores.
Item, that thou after thy sayd entry into religion and profession, and orders aforesayd, MarginaliaIoh. Cardmaker maryed.dyddest take to wyfe a wydow, and with her haddest carnall copulation, and diddest get of her a woman childe, breakyng thereby thy vow and order, and also the ordinance of the church.
Item, that thou hast beleued and taught, and so doest beleue that in the sacrament of the aultar vnder the visible signes there: that is to saye, vnder the formes of bread and wine, there is really and truly the true & very natural body and bloud of our sauiour Iesus Christ.
Item, that the beliefe of the catholicke church is, MarginaliaThe belief of the Popes Catholicke Church.that in hauyng the body and bloud of Christ really and truly conteined in the sacrament of the aultar, is to haue (by the omnipotent power of almighty God) the body and bloud of Christ there inuisibly, and really present vnder the sayd sacrament, and not to make thereby a new God or a new Christ, or a new body of Christ.
[Back to Top]Item, that it may stand well together, and so is the fayth of the catholicke church: MarginaliaTo speake naturally of the naturall body of Christ, these ij. can not stand together at one tyme, vnles we graunt Christ to haue two bodyes.that the body of Christ is visibly and truly ascended into heauen, and there is in the visible forme of his humanitie: and yet the same body in substance is inuisibly and trulye contayned in the sayd sacrament of the aultar.
[Back to Top]Item, that Christ at hys last Supper, taking bread into his handes, blessing it, breaking it, geuyng it to hys Apostels, and saying: Take, eate, this is my body, did institute a sacrament there, *Marginalia* That Christ neuer willed, neither can the scriptures beare it. wylling that hys body really & truly should bee contained in the sayd Sacrament, no substaunce of bread and wyne there remayning, but onelye the accidentes thereof.
[Back to Top]The articles put to Cardmaker, and his answers to them, came from records of Bishop Bonner, probably a separate act book, now lost.
TO the first article he aunswereth and confesseth the same to be true in euery part thereof.
To the second article he aūswereth and confesseth, that he being vnder age, did professe the sayd order and religion, and afterward by the autority of king Henry the. viij. he was dispensed with for the same religion.
Cardmaker was pointing out, accurately, that when the monastaries were dissolved under Henry VIII, his oath binding him as a Franciscan, was - under English law - voided. He was also claiming that he was entered into the order underage; this would not make the oath non-binding per se, but it provides a moral justification for his subsequent marriage, in violation of his oath.
[Back to Top]To the third he aunswereth and confesseth the same to be true in euery part thereof.
To the fourth he answereth and confesseth the first part therof to be true: and to þe second part of the same article, he aunswereth and sayth, that in mariage hee brake no vow, because hee was set at libertye to mary, both by the lawes of this realme, and also by the lawes and ordinances of the church of the same.
[Back to Top]To the fift he aunswereth & confesseth, that he hath beleued and taught as it is cōtained in thys article, but hee doth not now so beleue nor teach.
To the sixt he aunswereth, that he doth not beleue the same to be true in any part thereof.
To the seuenth he aunswereth, that he doth not beleue the same to be true in any part thereof.
To the eight he aunswereth, and doth beleue, videlicet, MarginaliaThe first part of this article is true: the second is false.that it is true, that is to say: that Christ taking bread at hys last supper into hys handes, blessing it, breaking it, geuing it to his disciples, and saying: Take, eate, this is my body, did institute a sacrament there. And to the other part of this article videlicet (wylling that hys body really and truely should bee contayned in the sayd sacrament, no substance of bread and wyne there remayning, but onely the accidents thereof) hee aunswereth that he doth not beleue the same to be true.
[Back to Top]By me Iohn Cardmaker.
Maister Cardmaker calling to mynde afterwardes the ready cauillinges of the Papists, and thinking him selfe not to haue fully and according to hys true meaning aunswered the latter part of the last eight article, dyd the next day after the foresayd aunsweres, exhibite vnto the bishop in a schedule this hereafter following.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaA more full answere to the second part of the eight article.Where
The articles put to Cardmaker, and his answers to them, came from records of Bishop Bonner, probably a separate act book, now lost.