Thematic Divisions in Book 11
1. The Martyrdom of Rogers 2. The Martyrdom of Saunders 3. Saunders' Letters 4. Hooper's Martyrdom 5. Hooper's Letters 6. Rowland Taylor's Martyrdom 7. Becket's Image and other events 8. Miles Coverdale and the Denmark Letters 9. Bonner and Reconciliation 10. Judge Hales 11. The Martyrdom of Thomas Tomkins 12. The Martyrdom of William Hunter 13. The Martyrdom of Higbed and Causton 14. The Martyrdom of Pigot, Knight and Laurence 15. Robert Farrar's Martyrdom 16. The Martyrdom of Rawlins/Rowland White17. The Restoration of Abbey Lands and other events in Spring 155518. The Providential Death of the Parson of Arundel 19. The Martyrdom of John Awcocke 20. The Martyrdom of George Marsh 21. The Letters of George Marsh 22. The Martyrdom of William Flower 23. The Martyrdom of Cardmaker and Warne 24. Letters of Warne and Cardmaker 25. The Martyrdom of Ardley and Simpson 26. John Tooly 27. The Examination of Robert Bromley [nb This is part of the Tooly affair]28. The Martyrdom of Thomas Haukes 29. Letters of Haukes 30. The Martyrdom of Thomas Watts 31. Mary's False Pregnancy32. Censorship Proclamation 33. Our Lady' Psalter 34. Martyrdom of Osmund, Bamford, Osborne and Chamberlain35. The Martyrdom of John Bradford 36. Bradford's Letters 37. William Minge 38. James Trevisam 39. The Martyrdom of John Bland 40. The Martyrdom of Frankesh, Middleton and Sheterden 41. Sheterden's Letters 42. Examinations of Hall, Wade and Polley 43. Martyrdom of Christopher Wade 44. Martyrdom of Carver and Launder 45. Martyrdom of Thomas Iveson 46. John Aleworth 47. Martyrdom of James Abbes 48. Martyrdom of Denley, Newman and Pacingham 49. Richard Hooke 50. Martyrdom of William Coker, et al 51. Martyrdom of George Tankerfield, et al 52. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Smith 53. Martyrdom of Harwood and Fust 54. Martyrdom of William Haile 55. George King, Thomas Leyes and John Wade 56. William Andrew 57. Martyrdom of Robert Samuel 58. Samuel's Letters 59. William Allen 60. Martyrdom of Roger Coo 61. Martyrdom of Thomas Cobb 62. Martyrdom of Catmer, Streater, Burwood, Brodbridge, Tutty 63. Martyrdom of Hayward and Goreway 64. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Glover 65. Cornelius Bungey 66. John and William Glover 67. Martyrdom of Wolsey and Pigot 68. Life and Character of Nicholas Ridley 69. Ridley's Letters 70. Life of Hugh Latimer 71. Latimer's Letters 72. Ridley and Latimer Re-examined and Executed73. More Letters of Ridley 74. Life and Death of Stephen Gardiner 75. Martyrdom of Webb, Roper and Park 76. William Wiseman 77. James Gore 78. Examinations and Martyrdom of John Philpot 79. Philpot's Letters 80. Martyrdom of Thomas Whittle, Barlett Green, et al 81. Letters of Thomas Wittle 82. Life of Bartlett Green 83. Letters of Bartlett Green 84. Thomas Browne 85. John Tudson 86. John Went 87. Isobel Foster 88. Joan Lashford 89. Five Canterbury Martyrs 90. Life and Martyrdom of Cranmer 91. Letters of Cranmer 92. Martyrdom of Agnes Potten and Joan Trunchfield 93. Persecution in Salisbury Maundrell, Coberly and Spicer 94. William Tyms, et al 95. Letters of Tyms 96. The Norfolk Supplication 97. Martyrdom of John Harpole and Joan Beach 98. John Hullier 99. Hullier's Letters 100. Christopher Lister and five other martyrs 101. Hugh Lauerocke and John Apprice 102. Katherine Hut, Elizabeth Thacknell, et al 103. Thomas Drury and Thomas Croker 104. Thomas Spicer, John Deny and Edmund Poole 105. Persecution of Winson and Mendlesam 106. Gregory Crow 107. William Slech 108. Avington Read, et al 109. Wood and Miles 110. Adherall and Clement 111. A Merchant's Servant Executed at Leicester 112. Thirteen Burnt at Stratford-le-Bow113. Persecution in Lichfield 114. Hunt, Norrice, Parret 115. Martyrdom of Bernard, Lawson and Foster 116. Examinations of John Fortune117. John Careless 118. Letters of John Careless 119. Martyrdom of Julius Palmer 120. Agnes Wardall 121. Peter Moone and his wife 122. Guernsey Martyrdoms 123. Dungate, Foreman and Tree 124. Martyrdom of Thomas More125. Examination of John Jackson126. Examination of John Newman 127. Martyrdom of Joan Waste 128. Martyrdom of Edward Sharpe 129. Four Burnt at Mayfield at Sussex 130. John Horne and a woman 131. William Dangerfield 132. Northampton Shoemaker 133. Prisoners Starved at Canterbury 134. More Persecution at Lichfield
Critical Apparatus for this Page
Commentary on the Text
Names and Places on this Page
Unavailable for this Edition
1789 [1750]

Quene Mary. The story, articles, and aunsweres of Iohn Cardmaker, Martyr.

MarginaliaAn. 1555. May.ctrines sake, that in his readyng they cut and mangled his gowne with their kniues. This Cardmaker being apprehended in the begynnyng of Queene Maryes reigne with M. Barlow Byshop of Bath, was brought to London  

Commentary   *   Close

In August 1553, Cardmaker, together with William Barlow, the bishop of Bath and Wells, were apprehended while trying to flee England disguised as merchants (Machyn, p. 75 and APC IV, p. 321).

and layd in prison in the Fleete,MarginaliaCardmaker with Maister Barlow apprehended, and layd in the Fleete. kyng Edwardes lawes yet beyng in force.  
Commentary   *   Close

What Foxe means is that Cardmaker and Barlow were not charged with heresy because there was no law then in force against it. They were arrested for trying to leave the realm without royal permission.

But after the Parlament was ended, in which the Pope was agayne admitted as supreme head of the Church, and þe Byshops had also gotten power and authoritie, Ex officio,  
Commentary   *   Close

There were technical meanings to the phrase 'ex officio' but here Foxe means it literally: the bishops now had offcial authority to proceed against Cardmaker and Barlow for heresy.

to exercise their tyranny: these two were both brought before Winchester Chauncellour, and others appointed by commission (as before is mencioned) to examine the faith of such as were thē prisoners, and as vnto others before, so now vnto them, þe Chauncellour offered the Queenes mercy, if they would agree and be conformable. &c.

[Back to Top]

MarginaliaBarlow and Cardmaker acceptable of Winchester as catholickes.To this they both made such an aunswere,  

Commentary   *   Close

Although Foxe had an official account of their examination (BL, Harley 421, fol. 39v), he is following the narrative he printed in the Rerum.

as the Chauncelour with his felow Commissioners allowed thē for Catholicke. Whether they of weakenes so aunswered, or he of subtilitie would so vnderstand theyr aunswere, that he might haue some forged example of a shrinkyng brother, to lay in the dishe of the rest which were to be examined, it may easily be perceiued by this, that to all them which folowed in examination, he obiected the example of Barlow and Cardmaker, cōmendyng their sobernes, discretion, & learnyng. But what soeuer their aunswere was, yet notwithstandyng Barlow was led agayne to the Fleete, MarginaliaM. Barlow exiled for the truth.from whence he afterward beyng dileuered, did by exile constantly beare witnes to the truth of Christes Gospell.  
Commentary   *   Close

Foxe's account of what happened during the examination of Barlow and Cardmaker is tendentious. Barlow and Cardmaker did agree to recant (BL, Harley 421, fol. 39v; cf. Machyn, p. 75; Wriothesley II, p. 126 and OL, I, p. 171). Barlow recanted and was released from prison; he then fled into exile (Garrett). Cardmaker refused to recant as promised and was ultimately executed.

[Back to Top]
Cardmaker was conueyed to the Counter in Breadstreete, the Byshop of London procuryng it to be published, that he should shortly be deliuered, after that he had subscribed to transubstantiation and certaine other Articles.

[Back to Top]

To the same prison where Cardmaker was, Laurence Saunders was brought (after þe sentence of excōmunication & condemnation, was pronounced against hym) MarginaliaConference betwene Laurence Saunders, and Iohn Cardmaker.where these ij. prisoners had such Christian conference, that whatsoeuer the breath of the Byshops blustered, and the tickle eares of the people to lightly beleued,  

Commentary   *   Close

Foxe is rather skillfully obscuring the fact that Cardmaker had promised to recant.

in the end they both shewed them selues constant confessours, and worthy Martyrs of Christ: as of Laurence Saunders it is already written. After whose departure, Cardmaker remayned there prisoner, to be bayted of the Papistes, which would needes seeme to haue a certaine hope that Cardmaker was become theirs. Continuall and great conferēce diuers of them had with him, with reasoninges, persuadynges, threatnynges, and all to none effect. To the end that their doynges might appeare, he required them to put their reasons in writyng, and promised by writyng to aunswere them.

[Back to Top]

MarginaliaD. Martin writeth against Cardmaker.Doctour Martine, who bare also a part in those pageants, tooke vpon him to be the chief doer by writyng, whose long vnsauerie letters & simple reasons for transubstantiation, and such Papisticall trash, this Cardmaker aunswered largely, learnedly, and substancially, confutyng the same, openyng the falshode of his Argumentes, and deliueryng the sentences of the fathers (which Martin abused for his purpose) to their true vnderstandyng: which his aunsweres I woulde had come to our handes. Thus constantly abode this man of God all the enemies doings, as he did also the death which hee suffred in Smithfield in London. Wherof ye shall heare more anone: but first we will suruey þe matter and maner of his Articles obiected agaynst him by Byshop Boner, with his aunsweres annexed to the same, as consequently here vnder foloweth.

[Back to Top]
¶ Articles obiected by Boner against Ioh. Tailor, alias Cardmaker, with his aunsweres vnto the same.  
Commentary   *   Close

The articles put to Cardmaker, and his answers to them, came from records of Bishop Bonner, probably a separate act book, now lost.

MarginaliaMay. 24. Articles ministred agaynst I. Cardmaker, by the Byshop of London.FIrst, I Edmund bishop of London, obiect against thee Syr Iohn Taylour alias Cardmaker, that thou wast and art of the citie and dioces of London, and so of the iurisdiction of me Edmund bishop of London.

Item, that thou in times past diddest professe the rule of S. Fraunces, and diddest by vow promise to keepe po-

uertie, chastitie, and obedience, according to the rule of S. Fraunces.MarginaliaIoh. Cardmaker first an obseruant Fryer.

Item that thou in times past diddest receyue al the orders of the church then vsed, to wyt, tam maiores, quam minores.

Item, that thou after thy sayd entry into religion and profession, and orders aforesayd, MarginaliaIoh. Cardmaker maryed.dyddest take to wyfe a wydow, and with her haddest carnall copulation, and diddest get of her a woman childe, breakyng thereby thy vow and order, and also the ordinance of the church.

Item, that thou hast beleued and taught, and so doest beleue that in the sacrament of the aultar vnder the visible signes there: that is to saye, vnder the formes of bread and wine, there is really and truly the true & very natural body and bloud of our sauiour Iesus Christ.

Item, that the beliefe of the catholicke church is, MarginaliaThe belief of the Popes Catholicke Church.that in hauyng the body and bloud of Christ really and truly conteined in the sacrament of the aultar, is to haue (by the omnipotent power of almighty God) the body and bloud of Christ there inuisibly, and really present vnder the sayd sacrament, and not to make thereby a new God or a new Christ, or a new body of Christ.

[Back to Top]

Item, that it may stand well together, and so is the fayth of the catholicke church: MarginaliaTo speake naturally of the naturall body of Christ, these ij. can not stand together at one tyme, vnles we graunt Christ to haue two bodyes.that the body of Christ is visibly and truly ascended into heauen, and there is in the visible forme of his humanitie: and yet the same body in substance is inuisibly and trulye contayned in the sayd sacrament of the aultar.

[Back to Top]

Item, that Christ at hys last Supper, taking bread into his handes, blessing it, breaking it, geuyng it to hys Apostels, and saying: Take, eate, this is my body, did institute a sacrament there, *Marginalia* That Christ neuer willed, neither can the scriptures beare it. wylling that hys body really & truly should bee contained in the sayd Sacrament, no substaunce of bread and wyne there remayning, but onelye the accidentes thereof.

[Back to Top]
¶ Aūsweres of Cardmaker to the articles aforesayd.  
Commentary   *   Close

The articles put to Cardmaker, and his answers to them, came from records of Bishop Bonner, probably a separate act book, now lost.

MarginaliaIoh. Cardmaker answereth to the articles.

TO the first article he aunswereth and confesseth the same to be true in euery part thereof.

To the second article he aūswereth and confesseth, that he being vnder age, did professe the sayd order and religion, and afterward by the autority of king Henry the. viij. he was dispensed with for the same religion.  

Commentary   *   Close

Cardmaker was pointing out, accurately, that when the monastaries were dissolved under Henry VIII, his oath binding him as a Franciscan, was - under English law - voided. He was also claiming that he was entered into the order underage; this would not make the oath non-binding per se, but it provides a moral justification for his subsequent marriage, in violation of his oath.

[Back to Top]

To the third he aunswereth and confesseth the same to be true in euery part thereof.

To the fourth he answereth and confesseth the first part therof to be true: and to þe second part of the same article, he aunswereth and sayth, that in mariage hee brake no vow, because hee was set at libertye to mary, both by the lawes of this realme, and also by the lawes and ordinances of the church of the same.

[Back to Top]

To the fift he aunswereth & confesseth, that he hath beleued and taught as it is cōtained in thys article, but hee doth not now so beleue nor teach.

To the sixt he aunswereth, that he doth not beleue the same to be true in any part thereof.

To the seuenth he aunswereth, that he doth not beleue the same to be true in any part thereof.

To the eight he aunswereth, and doth beleue, videlicet, MarginaliaThe first part of this article is true: the second is false.that it is true, that is to say: that Christ taking bread at hys last supper into hys handes, blessing it, breaking it, geuing it to his disciples, and saying: Take, eate, this is my body, did institute a sacrament there. And to the other part of this article videlicet (wylling that hys body really and truely should bee contayned in the sayd sacrament, no substance of bread and wyne there remayning, but onely the accidents thereof) hee aunswereth that he doth not beleue the same to be true.

[Back to Top]

By me Iohn Cardmaker.

Maister Cardmaker calling to mynde afterwardes the ready cauillinges of the Papists, and thinking him selfe not to haue fully and according to hys true meaning aunswered the latter part of the last eight article, dyd the next day after the foresayd aunsweres, exhibite vnto the bishop in a schedule this hereafter following.

[Back to Top]

MarginaliaA more full answere to the second part of the eight article.Where  

Commentary   *   Close

The articles put to Cardmaker, and his answers to them, came from records of Bishop Bonner, probably a separate act book, now lost.

in my aunswer to your articles, I deny the presence of Christ in the sacramēt, I meane not his sacramentall presence, for that I confesse: but my deniall is of hys carnall presence in the same: but yet far-

ther,