Thematic Divisions in Book 11
1. The Martyrdom of Rogers 2. The Martyrdom of Saunders 3. Saunders' Letters 4. Hooper's Martyrdom 5. Hooper's Letters 6. Rowland Taylor's Martyrdom 7. Becket's Image and other events 8. Miles Coverdale and the Denmark Letters 9. Bonner and Reconciliation 10. Judge Hales 11. The Martyrdom of Thomas Tomkins 12. The Martyrdom of William Hunter 13. The Martyrdom of Higbed and Causton 14. The Martyrdom of Pigot, Knight and Laurence 15. Robert Farrar's Martyrdom 16. The Martyrdom of Rawlins/Rowland White17. The Restoration of Abbey Lands and other events in Spring 155518. The Providential Death of the Parson of Arundel 19. The Martyrdom of John Awcocke 20. The Martyrdom of George Marsh 21. The Letters of George Marsh 22. The Martyrdom of William Flower 23. The Martyrdom of Cardmaker and Warne 24. Letters of Warne and Cardmaker 25. The Martyrdom of Ardley and Simpson 26. John Tooly 27. The Examination of Robert Bromley [nb This is part of the Tooly affair]28. The Martyrdom of Thomas Haukes 29. Letters of Haukes 30. The Martyrdom of Thomas Watts 31. Mary's False Pregnancy32. Censorship Proclamation 33. Our Lady' Psalter 34. Martyrdom of Osmund, Bamford, Osborne and Chamberlain35. The Martyrdom of John Bradford 36. Bradford's Letters 37. William Minge 38. James Trevisam 39. The Martyrdom of John Bland 40. The Martyrdom of Frankesh, Middleton and Sheterden 41. Sheterden's Letters 42. Examinations of Hall, Wade and Polley 43. Martyrdom of Christopher Wade 44. Martyrdom of Carver and Launder 45. Martyrdom of Thomas Iveson 46. John Aleworth 47. Martyrdom of James Abbes 48. Martyrdom of Denley, Newman and Pacingham 49. Richard Hooke 50. Martyrdom of William Coker, et al 51. Martyrdom of George Tankerfield, et al 52. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Smith 53. Martyrdom of Harwood and Fust 54. Martyrdom of William Haile 55. George King, Thomas Leyes and John Wade 56. William Andrew 57. Martyrdom of Robert Samuel 58. Samuel's Letters 59. William Allen 60. Martyrdom of Roger Coo 61. Martyrdom of Thomas Cobb 62. Martyrdom of Catmer, Streater, Burwood, Brodbridge, Tutty 63. Martyrdom of Hayward and Goreway 64. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Glover 65. Cornelius Bungey 66. John and William Glover 67. Martyrdom of Wolsey and Pigot 68. Life and Character of Nicholas Ridley 69. Ridley's Letters 70. Life of Hugh Latimer 71. Latimer's Letters 72. Ridley and Latimer Re-examined and Executed73. More Letters of Ridley 74. Life and Death of Stephen Gardiner 75. Martyrdom of Webb, Roper and Park 76. William Wiseman 77. James Gore 78. Examinations and Martyrdom of John Philpot 79. Philpot's Letters 80. Martyrdom of Thomas Whittle, Barlett Green, et al 81. Letters of Thomas Wittle 82. Life of Bartlett Green 83. Letters of Bartlett Green 84. Thomas Browne 85. John Tudson 86. John Went 87. Isobel Foster 88. Joan Lashford 89. Five Canterbury Martyrs 90. Life and Martyrdom of Cranmer 91. Letters of Cranmer 92. Martyrdom of Agnes Potten and Joan Trunchfield 93. Persecution in Salisbury Maundrell, Coberly and Spicer 94. William Tyms, et al 95. Letters of Tyms 96. The Norfolk Supplication 97. Martyrdom of John Harpole and Joan Beach 98. John Hullier 99. Hullier's Letters 100. Christopher Lister and five other martyrs 101. Hugh Lauerocke and John Apprice 102. Katherine Hut, Elizabeth Thacknell, et al 103. Thomas Drury and Thomas Croker 104. Thomas Spicer, John Deny and Edmund Poole 105. Persecution of Winson and Mendlesam 106. Gregory Crow 107. William Slech 108. Avington Read, et al 109. Wood and Miles 110. Adherall and Clement 111. A Merchant's Servant Executed at Leicester 112. Thirteen Burnt at Stratford-le-Bow113. Persecution in Lichfield 114. Hunt, Norrice, Parret 115. Martyrdom of Bernard, Lawson and Foster 116. Examinations of John Fortune117. John Careless 118. Letters of John Careless 119. Martyrdom of Julius Palmer 120. Agnes Wardall 121. Peter Moone and his wife 122. Guernsey Martyrdoms 123. Dungate, Foreman and Tree 124. Martyrdom of Thomas More125. Examination of John Jackson126. Examination of John Newman 127. Martyrdom of Joan Waste 128. Martyrdom of Edward Sharpe 129. Four Burnt at Mayfield at Sussex 130. John Horne and a woman 131. William Dangerfield 132. Northampton Shoemaker 133. Prisoners Starved at Canterbury 134. More Persecution at Lichfield
Critical Apparatus for this Page
Latin/Greek TranslationsCommentary on the Text
Names and Places on this Page
Unavailable for this Edition
1945 [1906]

Quene Mary. The story and life of B. Latimer, Preacher and Martyr.

MarginaliaAn. 1555. October.glad therof, seekyng by that meanes to be rid out of the Court, wherewith in no case hee coulde agree: and so hauing a graunt of the benefice, contrary to the mynde of Doct. Buttes, he would needes depart and be resident at the same.

This benefice was in Wilshire vnder the Dioces of Sarum, the name of which Towne was called West Kington.  

Commentary   *   Close

Latimer was collated to the living of West Kingston in the diocese of Salisburyon 14 January 1531, probably at the behest of Anne Boleyn.

MarginaliaM. Latimer beneficed in Wilshire. Where this good preacher did exercise hym selfe with much diligence of teachyng to instruct his flocke: and not onely to them his diligence extēded, but also to all the countrey about. In fine, his diligēce was so great, his preachyng so mighty, the maner of his teachyng so zelous, that there in lyke sorte he could not escape without enemyes. So true it is that S. Paul fortelleth vs: Who soeuer will lyue godly in CHRIST, shall suffer persecution. It so chaunced that where as he preaching vpō þe blessed Virgin CHRISTES mother (whō we call our Lady) had therupon declared hys mind, referryng & reducyng all honour onely to CHRIST our onely Sauiour, MarginaliaM. Latymer troubled for preaching Christ only to be our Sauiour, and not our Lady.certaine Popish Priestes beyng therewith offended, sought and wrought much trouble agaynst hym, drawyng out Articles and impositions, which they vntruly, vniustly, falsly, & vncharitably imputed vnto him, first that he should preach against our Lady for that he reproued in a Sermon MarginaliaThe superstitious rudenes of blind priestes.the superstitious rudenes of certeine blynd Priestes, which so held altogether vpon that blessed virgin, as though she neuer had any sinne, nor were saued by CHRIST the onely Sauiour of the whole world.

[Back to Top]

MarginaliaMatter deuised agaynst M. Latymer by Popish Priestes.Item, that he should say, that Saintes were not to be worshipped.

Item, that Aue Maria was a salutation onely, and no prayer.

Item, that there was no materiall fire in hell.

Item, that there was no Purgatory, in saying, that he had leuer be in Purgatory then in Lollards tower.

Touchyng the whole discourse of which Articles, with his reply and aūswere to the same, hereafter shall folow (by the Lordes assistaunce) when we come to his letters.

The chief impugners and molesters of him, besides these coūtrey Priestes, were MarginaliaDoct. Powell, Doct. Wilson, D. Sherwood. Hubberdine, D. Warrham Archb. of Canterbury, D. Stokesley B. of London, troublers of M. Latymer.Doct. Powell of Salisbury, Doct. Wilson sometyme of Cambridge, M. Huberdin, and Doct. Sherwode. Of whom some preached agaynst hym, some also dyd write agaynst hym: in so much that by there procurement he was cited vp & called to appeare before W. Warrham Archbyshop of Cāterbury and Iohn Stokesley Bishop of London. an. 1531. Ianu. 29. the copy of which citatiō may appeare in our former edition, pag. 1332. more at large.  

Commentary   *   Close

This harassment of Latimer in 1532 was but a stage in a long campaign directed against him by John Stokesley, bishop of London (1530-1539), in defense of the role of good works in the economy of salvation. That Latimer had preached a sermon in the London parish of St. Mary Abchurch, without Stokesley's permission, only increased the bishop's fury. Stokesley pursued Latimer even after Latimer became bishop of Salisbury.

[Back to Top]

This citation was printed in the 1563 edition, deleted from the 1570 and 1576 editions, and reprinted in the 1583 edition.

[Back to Top]

Agaynst this citation, although M. Latimer dyd appeale to hys own Ordinary,  

Commentary   *   Close

I.e., to the bishop with jurisdiction over Latimer; in this case the bishop of Salisbury.

MarginaliaM. Latymer appealed from the Byshop of Londons citation, to his own Ordinary. requiring by him to be ordered, yet all that notwithstanding, hee was had vp to Lōdon before Warrham the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of London, where hee was greatly molested and deteyned a long space from hys cure at home.MarginaliaM. Latymer molested by Warrham Archbishop of Cant. and Stokesley Byshop of London. There he beyng called thrise euery weeke before the sayd Bishops to make aunswer for hys preaching, had certayne articles or propositions drawen out and layd to hym, whereunto they required him to subscribe. At length he not onely perceiuing their practticall proceedings, but also much greued with their troublesome vnquietnes, which neyther would preach thē selues nor yet suffer hym to preach and to do hys duty, writeth to the foresayd Archbyshop, partly excusing hys infirmity, whereby he could not appeare at theyr commaundement, partly expostulating wyth them for so troublyng and deteinyng hym from hys duty doing, and that for no iust cause, but onely for preachyng the truth agaynst certayne vayne abuses crept into religion, much needefull to bee spoken agaynst. Which all may appeare by his Epistle sent to a certaine Bishop or Archbishop in our former edition expressed in Latin at large, page. 1333.  
Commentary   *   Close

This epistle was printed in the 1563 edition, dropped from the 1570 and 1576 editions, and restored in the 1583 edition.

if any be disposed there to see and peruse the same. In þe which foresaid Epistle (as there

[Back to Top]

is to be seeneMarginaliaMaster Latimers letter to the Archb. read thereof in the former edition pag. 1333.) he maketh mention of certaine Articles or propositions, whereunto he was required by the bishops to subscribe. The copy of which articles or bare propositions (as he termeth them) I thought here vnder to notifie, translated out of lattin into Englysh, as followeth.

[Back to Top]
¶ Articles deuised by the Bishops, for M. Latimer to subscribe vnto.  
Commentary   *   Close

The original of these articles is found in the register of Bishop John Stokesley of London, Guildhall Library MS 9531/10, fo. 127v. It was copied by Foxe in BL, Harley MS 425, fos. 13r-14r.

MarginaliaArticles propounded to Master Latymer to subscribe vnto.I Beleue that there is a Purgatory to purge þe soules of the deade after thys lyfe.

That the soules in Purgatory are holpen wyth the Masses, praiers, and almes of the liuing.

That the Saintes do pray as Mediators now for vs in heauen.

That they are to be honored of vs in heauen.

That it is profitable for Christians to call vpon the Sainctes, that they may pray as Mediators for vs vnto God.

That Pilgrimages and oblations done to the sepulchers and Reliques of Saintes, are meritorious.

That they which haue vowed perpetuall chastitye, may not marry nor breake their vow, without the dispensation of the Pope.

That the keyes of bynding and losyng deliuered to Peter, do styll remayne with the Bishops of Rome hys Successors although they lyue wickedly, and are by no meanes nor at any tyme committed to lay men.

That men may merite and deserue at Gods hand by fasting, prayer, and other workes of piety.

That they which are forbiddē of the bishop to preach, as suspect persons, ought to cease vntyll they haue purged them selues before the sayd Bishops or their Superiours, and be restored againe.

That the fast which is vsed in Lent and other fastes prescribed by the Canons, and by custome receiued of the Christians (except necessity otherwyse require) are to be obserued and kept.

That God in euery one of the. vij. Sacramentes geueth grace to a man rightly receiuing the same.

That consecrations, sanctifiynges and blessinges by vse and custome receiued into the Church, are laudable and profitable.

That it is laudable and profitable that the venerable Images of the Crucifix and other Sayntes, should bee had in the Church as a remembraunce, and to the honor and worship of IESVS CHRIST, and hys Saintes.

That it is laudable and profitable to decke & to cloth those Images, and to set vp burning lightes before thē, to the honor of the sayd Saintes.

To these Articles whether he did subscribe or no,  

Commentary   *   Close

A note by Foxe on BL, Harley MS 425, fo. 13v (see C113-T) states that these articles were registered, but not signed by Latimer. But that is not uncommon with articles copied into the register and it does not mean, as Foxe argues, that Latimer did not recant.

it is vncerteine.MarginaliaMaster Latymer whether he subscribed or no, it is vncertein. It appeareth by his Epistle aboue written to the Byshop, that he durst not consent vnto them, where hee writeth in these wordes: His ego nudis sententijs subscribere nō audeo, quia popularis superstitionis diutius duraturæ, quoad possum, autorculus esse nolo. &c.  
Latin/Greek Translations   *   Close
Latimer
Foxe text Latin

His ego nudis sententiis subscribere non audeo, quia popularis superstitionis diutius duraturae, quoad possum, autorculus esse nolo, &c.

[As in1563,except forHisin place ofHincin line 1,superstitionisin place ofsuperstitionein line 2 andpossumin place ofpotsumin line 3]

Foxe text translation

Not translated.

Translation (Wade 2003)

From here I do not dare to subscribe to nude propositions, because I do not wish to be the author, as far as I can, of a poular superstition which is going to last any longer, etc.

But yet whether he was compelled afterward to agree, through the cruell handlyng of the Byshops, it is in doubt. By the wordes and the title in Tonstals Register prefixed before the Articles, it may seeme that he subscribed. The wordes of the Register be these: Hugo Latimerus in sacra Theologia Bacc. in vniuersitate Cantab. coram Cant. Archiepiscopo Iohan. Lond. Episcopo, reliquaq̀ concione apud Westmonast. vocatus, cōfessus est & recognouit fidem suam, sic sentiēdo vt sequitur, in his artic. 21. die Martij. An. 1531.  
Latin/Greek Translations   *   Close
Register
Foxe text Latin

Hugo Latimerus in sacra Theologia Bacc. in vniuersitate Cantab. coram Cant. Archiespiscopo Iohan. Lond. Episcopo, reliquaque concione apud Westmonast. vocatus, confessus est, & recognouit fidem suam, sic sentiendo vt sequitur, in his artic. 21. die Martii. An. 1531.

Foxe text translation

Not translated.

Translation (Wade 2003)

Hugh Latimer Bachelor in holy theology in the university of Cambridge having been called into the presence of the Archbishop of Canterbury, John the Bishop of London, and the rest of the council at Westminster, confessed, and knew his faith again, in thus believing as follows in these articles. 21st day of March. 1531.

[Back to Top]
If these wordes be true, it may be so thought that he subscribed. And whether he so did, no great matter nor maruell, the iniquity of the tyme being such that either he must needes so do, or els abyde the Byshops blessyng, that is, cruell sentence of death, which he at that tyme (as him selfe cōfessed preachyng at Stamford) was loth to susteine for such matters as these were, vnlesse it were for Articles necessary of his beliefe, by which his words I cōiecture rather that he did subscribe at length, albeit it was long before he could be brought so to do. MarginaliaThe crafty handling of the bishops in examining M. Latymer.Yet this by the way is to be noted concernyng the crafty and deceitfull hādlyng of these Byshops in his examinations, what subtile de-

[Back to Top]
uises