Thematic Divisions in Book 11
1. The Martyrdom of Rogers 2. The Martyrdom of Saunders 3. Saunders' Letters 4. Hooper's Martyrdom 5. Hooper's Letters 6. Rowland Taylor's Martyrdom 7. Becket's Image and other events 8. Miles Coverdale and the Denmark Letters 9. Bonner and Reconciliation 10. Judge Hales 11. The Martyrdom of Thomas Tomkins 12. The Martyrdom of William Hunter 13. The Martyrdom of Higbed and Causton 14. The Martyrdom of Pigot, Knight and Laurence 15. Robert Farrar's Martyrdom 16. The Martyrdom of Rawlins/Rowland White17. The Restoration of Abbey Lands and other events in Spring 155518. The Providential Death of the Parson of Arundel 19. The Martyrdom of John Awcocke 20. The Martyrdom of George Marsh 21. The Letters of George Marsh 22. The Martyrdom of William Flower 23. The Martyrdom of Cardmaker and Warne 24. Letters of Warne and Cardmaker 25. The Martyrdom of Ardley and Simpson 26. John Tooly 27. The Examination of Robert Bromley [nb This is part of the Tooly affair]28. The Martyrdom of Thomas Haukes 29. Letters of Haukes 30. The Martyrdom of Thomas Watts 31. Mary's False Pregnancy32. Censorship Proclamation 33. Our Lady' Psalter 34. Martyrdom of Osmund, Bamford, Osborne and Chamberlain35. The Martyrdom of John Bradford 36. Bradford's Letters 37. William Minge 38. James Trevisam 39. The Martyrdom of John Bland 40. The Martyrdom of Frankesh, Middleton and Sheterden 41. Sheterden's Letters 42. Examinations of Hall, Wade and Polley 43. Martyrdom of Christopher Wade 44. Martyrdom of Carver and Launder 45. Martyrdom of Thomas Iveson 46. John Aleworth 47. Martyrdom of James Abbes 48. Martyrdom of Denley, Newman and Pacingham 49. Richard Hooke 50. Martyrdom of William Coker, et al 51. Martyrdom of George Tankerfield, et al 52. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Smith 53. Martyrdom of Harwood and Fust 54. Martyrdom of William Haile 55. George King, Thomas Leyes and John Wade 56. William Andrew 57. Martyrdom of Robert Samuel 58. Samuel's Letters 59. William Allen 60. Martyrdom of Roger Coo 61. Martyrdom of Thomas Cobb 62. Martyrdom of Catmer, Streater, Burwood, Brodbridge, Tutty 63. Martyrdom of Hayward and Goreway 64. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Glover 65. Cornelius Bungey 66. John and William Glover 67. Martyrdom of Wolsey and Pigot 68. Life and Character of Nicholas Ridley 69. Ridley's Letters 70. Life of Hugh Latimer 71. Latimer's Letters 72. Ridley and Latimer Re-examined and Executed73. More Letters of Ridley 74. Life and Death of Stephen Gardiner 75. Martyrdom of Webb, Roper and Park 76. William Wiseman 77. James Gore 78. Examinations and Martyrdom of John Philpot 79. Philpot's Letters 80. Martyrdom of Thomas Whittle, Barlett Green, et al 81. Letters of Thomas Wittle 82. Life of Bartlett Green 83. Letters of Bartlett Green 84. Thomas Browne 85. John Tudson 86. John Went 87. Isobel Foster 88. Joan Lashford 89. Five Canterbury Martyrs 90. Life and Martyrdom of Cranmer 91. Letters of Cranmer 92. Martyrdom of Agnes Potten and Joan Trunchfield 93. Persecution in Salisbury Maundrell, Coberly and Spicer 94. William Tyms, et al 95. Letters of Tyms 96. The Norfolk Supplication 97. Martyrdom of John Harpole and Joan Beach 98. John Hullier 99. Hullier's Letters 100. Christopher Lister and five other martyrs 101. Hugh Lauerocke and John Apprice 102. Katherine Hut, Elizabeth Thacknell, et al 103. Thomas Drury and Thomas Croker 104. Thomas Spicer, John Deny and Edmund Poole 105. Persecution of Winson and Mendlesam 106. Gregory Crow 107. William Slech 108. Avington Read, et al 109. Wood and Miles 110. Adherall and Clement 111. A Merchant's Servant Executed at Leicester 112. Thirteen Burnt at Stratford-le-Bow113. Persecution in Lichfield 114. Hunt, Norrice, Parret 115. Martyrdom of Bernard, Lawson and Foster 116. Examinations of John Fortune117. John Careless 118. Letters of John Careless 119. Martyrdom of Julius Palmer 120. Agnes Wardall 121. Peter Moone and his wife 122. Guernsey Martyrdoms 123. Dungate, Foreman and Tree 124. Martyrdom of Thomas More125. Examination of John Jackson126. Examination of John Newman 127. Martyrdom of Joan Waste 128. Martyrdom of Edward Sharpe 129. Four Burnt at Mayfield at Sussex 130. John Horne and a woman 131. William Dangerfield 132. Northampton Shoemaker 133. Prisoners Starved at Canterbury 134. More Persecution at Lichfield
Critical Apparatus for this Page
Latin/Greek TranslationsCommentary on the Text
Names and Places on this Page
Unavailable for this Edition
1965 [1926]

Quene Mary. The last examinations of B. Ridley and M. Latimer, Martyrs.

MarginaliaAn. 1555. October.and such lyke: wherefore it requyreth that I preferre the antiquity of the primatiue church before the nouelty of the Romish Church.

Lin. M. Ridley, these faultes which you charge the Sea of Rome withall, are in deede no faultes. For first it was neuer forbid þe laitie, but that they might if they *Marginalia* The Bohemians required that, and were shent for theyr labour. Read before pa. 714. demaunded, receiue vnder both kyndes. You know also that Christ after his resurrection, at what tyme he went with his Apostels to Galile, opened hymselfe by breaking of bread. You knowe that S. Paule after hys long sailing towardes Rome brake bread, & that the Apostels came together in breaking of bread, which declareth that it is not vnlawfull to minister the Sacrament vnder the forme of bread onely:MarginaliaGreat reasons of the Catholickes to proue the communion vnder one kinde. & yet the church had iust occasion to decree that the laity should receyue in one kynd onely, thereby to take away an opinion of the vnlearned, that CHRIST was not wholy both flesh and bloud vnder the forme of bread. Therefore to take away that opinion, and to establish better the peoples fayth, the holy ghost in the church thought good to decree that the laity should receiue onely in one kynde: and it is no newes for the church vpon iust cōsideration to alter rites & ceremonies. Marginalia
Argument.
The church did abrogate the precept of the Apostle of strangled and bloudinges:
Ergo the church likewise hath authoritie touching the ministration vnder both kindes.
For you read in þe Actes of the Apostles, that S. Paule wryting to certaine of the Gentiles which had receyued þe Gospell, biddeth thē to abstaine a suffocato & sanguine,  

Latin/Greek Translations   *   Close
White, Bishop of Lincoln
Foxe text Latin

a suffocato & sanguine

Foxe text translation

from thyngs stifled and from bloud

from thynges stifled  
Commentary   *   Close

Strangled; the reference is to Hebrew dietary law which prohibits the eating of animals that are not killed in the prescribed manner.

and from bloud, so that this seemeth to bee an expresse commaundement: yet who will say but that it is lawfull to eate bloudinges? how is it lawfull, but by the permission of the church?  
Commentary   *   Close

The reference is to Acts 15: 20 and 29 and 21: 25 in which Paul commanded Gentile Christians to observe Jewish dietary laws.

[Back to Top]

Marginalia
Auuswere.
The precept of the apostles was but for a time, and for a purpose, by litle to winne the Iewes.
Christes commaundement [doe thys] was for euer and simply commaunded without any bearing wyth the strong or weake.
Rid. My Lord, such things as S. Paule enioyned to þe Gentiles for a sufferaunce, by a little and a litle to win the Iewes to CHRIST, were onely commaundements of tyme, and respected not the successours:  

Commentary   *   Close

Did not apply to succeeding generations.

but CHRISTES commaundement: doe thys (that is, that which he dyd in remembraunce, which was not to minister in one kynde onely) was not a commaundement for a tyme, but to perseuer to the worldes end.

[Back to Top]

¶ But the B. of Lincolne not attendyng to thys aunswer, without any stay proceeded in hys oration.

So that the church seemeth to haue authority by the holy Ghost, whom CHRIST sayd he would send after hys ascension, which should teach the Apostles all truth, to haue power & iurisdiction to alter such points of the scripture, euer reseruyng the foundation: but we came not, as I sayd before, in this sort to reason the matter wyth you, but haue certayne instructions ministred vnto vs, according to the tenor of the which wee must proceede, proposing certayne articles, vnto the which we require your aunswer directly, eyther affirmatiuely either negatiuely to euery of them, either denying them, either graunting them without farther disputations or reasoning: for we haue already stretched our instructions, in that we suffered you to debate and reason the matter in such sorte as wee haue done: the which articles you shall heare now, and to morrow at eight of the clocke in S. Maries church, we wyl require and take your aunswers, and then according to the same proceede: and if you require a copy of them, you shall haue it, pen, inke and paper, also all such bookes as you shall demaund, if they be to bee gotten in the Vniuersitye.

[Back to Top]
¶ The Articles.

MarginaliaArticles ioyntly and seuerally  

Commentary   *   Close

Separately.

ministred to D. Ridley & M. Latymer, by the Popes deputies.IN dei nomine, Amē. Nos Iohannes Lincoln. Iacobus Glocest. & Iohannes Bristol. Episcopi, per Reuerendis. dominū Reginaldū miseratione diuina S. Mariæ in Cosmedin. &c.  
Latin/Greek Translations   *   Close
Bishops of Lincoln, Gloucester & Bristol
Foxe text Latin

In dei nomine, Amen. Nos Iohannes Lincoln. Iacobus Glocest. & Iohannes Bristol. Episcopi, per Reuerendis. dominum Reginaldum miseratione diuina S. Mariae in Cosmedin. &c.

Foxe text translation

Not translated.

Translation (Wade 2003)

In the name of God, Amen. We, Bishops John of Lincoln, James of Gloucester and John of Bristol, through the Most Reverend Lord Reginald with the divine pity(?) of St. Mary in Cosmedin(?). etc.

[As in1563,but shortened]

1. We do obiect to thee Nic. Ridley and to thee Hugh Latymer, ioyntly and seuerally, first that thou Nic. Ridley in this hye Vniuersitie of Oxford, an. 1554. in the monethes of Aprill, May, Iune, Iuly, or in some one or mo of thē, hast affirmed and openly defended and mainteined, and in many other tymes and places besides, that the true and naturall body of CHRIST, after consecration of the Priest, is not really present in the Sacramēt of the altar.

[Back to Top]

2. Item, that in the yeare and monethes aforesaid, thou

hast publickly affirmed and defended, that in the Sacrament of the altar remaineth still the substance of bread and wyne.

3. Itē, that in the said yeare & monethes, thou hast opēly affirmed, and obstinatly mainteined, that in the Masse is no propitiatory sacrifice for the quicke and the dead.

4. Item, that in the yeare, place, and monethes aforesayd, these thy foresayd assertions solemnly haue bene cōdemned by the scholastical censure of this schole, as hereticall, & contrary to the Catholicke faith, by the worshipfull M. Doct. Weston Prolocutor then of the conuocation house, as also by other sondry learned men of both the Vniuersities.

[Back to Top]

5. Item, that all and singular the premisses be true, notorious, famous, and openly knowen by publicke fame, as well to them nere hand, as also to them in distant places farre of.

¶ Examinations vpon the sayd Articles.

ALl these articles I thought good here to place together, that as often as herafter rehearsall shalbe of any of them, the reader may haue recourse hether, and peruse the same, and not to trouble the story with seuerall repetitions therof.

Lincol. After these Articles were read, the Bishops tooke counsell togethers. MarginaliaB. Ridley examined vpon the Articles aforesayd.At the last the Byshop of Lyncolne sayd: these are the very same Articles which you in open disputation here in the Vniuersitie did maynteyne and defend. What say you vnto the first? I pray you aunswere affirmatiuely or negatiuely.

[Back to Top]

Rid. Why my Lord, I supposed your gentlenes had bene such, that you would haue geuen me space vntill to morow, that vppon good aduisement I myght bryng a determinate aunswere.

Linc. Yea M. Ridley, I meane not that your aunsweres now shalbe preiudiciall to your aunsweres to morow. I will take your aunsweres at this tyme, and yet notwithstandyng it shalbe lawfull to you to adde, diminish, alter, and chaunge of these aunsweres to morow what you will.

Rid. In deede, in lyke maner at our last disputatiōs I had many thynges promised and few perfourmed.MarginaliaThe Catholickes promise fayre, but they performe nothing. It was sayd that after disputations I should haue a copie therof, and licence to chaunge myne aunsweres as I should thinke good: it was meete also that I should haue seene what was written by the Notaries at that tyme. So your Lordshyp pretendeth great gentlenes in geuyng me a tyme, but this gentlenes is the same that CHRIST had of the hygh Priestes: for you, as your Lordshyp sayth, haue no power to condemne me, neither at any tyme to put a man to death: MarginaliaThe hie priestes had no powre to put Christ to death, but they had power to commit him to Pilate, neyther would they suffer him to absolue Christ.so in lyke sorte the hygh Priestes sayd that it was not lawfull for them to put any man to death, but committed CHRIST to Pylate, neither would suffer hym to absolue CHRIST, although hee sought all the meanes therefore that hee might. Then spake Doct. Weston, one of the audience.

[Back to Top]

MarginaliaD. Weston shooteth his bolt.West. What? do you make the kyng Pilate?

Rid. No Master Doctour, I do but compare your deedes with Cayphas his deedes and the high Priests, which would condemne no man to death, as ye will not, and yet would not suffer Pylate to absolue and deliuer CHRIST.

Linc.. M. Ridley, we mynd not but that you shal enioy the benefite of aunsweryng to morow, and wil take your aunsweres now as now: to morow you shall chaunge, take out, adde, and alter what you will. In the meane season we require you to aunswere directly to euery Article either affirmatiuely or negatiuely.

[Back to Top]

Rid. Seyng you appoynt me a tyme to aunswere to morow, and yet wil take myne aunsweres out of hand, first I require the Notaries to take and write my protestation, MarginaliaThe protestation of Doctour Ridley.that in no point I acknowledge your authority, or admit you to be my iudges in that poynt you are authorised frō þe Pope. Therfore whatsoeuer I shal say or do, I protest, I neither, say it neither do it willyngly, therby to admit þe authoritie of þe Pope: & if your Lordshyp will geue me leaue, I will shew the causes which

[Back to Top]
moueth