MarginaliaWhether the Friers make vp the body of Antichrist or not.All these thynges well considered, now remayneth in the church to be marked: that for somuch as these Friers (with their new found testament of Frier Frauncis) not beyng contented with the testament of God in his sonne Christ, began to spryng the same tyme, when as Satan was prophesied to be let loose, by the order of the Scripture: whether therfore it is to be doubted, that these Friers make vp the body of Antichrist, which is prophecied to come in the churche, or not: so much more to be doubted, because who so lyst to try, shal finde, that of all other enemyes of Christ, of whō some be manifest, some be priuie, all be together cruel: yet is there no such sorte of enemyes, whiche more sleightly deceaueth the simple Christian, or more deepely drowneth hym in damnation, then doth this doctrine of the Friers.
[Back to Top]But of this Oration of Armachanus enough
The remaining biographical material on Fitzralph and the descriptions of those who oppossed him all come from Bale, Catalogus, p. 445.
Fitzralph died in Avignon (three, not seven or eight years) after he made his final voyage there, but he was not in exile. Rather he was prosecuting his case in the papal court against the mendicant orders.
MarginaliaEx chron. reg. Richard. 2.After the death of Armachanus, the Friers had contētion lykewise wt the monks of Benedictes order, about þe same yere. 1360. & so remoued their cause both agaynst the monkes and against the vniuersitie of Oxford, vnto the court of Rome, wherein sayth the autor, they lacked an other Richard. Ex Botonero. MarginaliaFryers against the Vniuersitie of Oxford.By thys appeareth to be true, whiche is testified in the fyrste tome of VVald. that long debate continued betwene the Friers and the vniuersity of Oxford: MarginaliaEnglish writers against the Friers.Agaynst whom fyrst stoode Robert Grostede Bishop of Lincolne, aboue mencioned: Thē Seuallus of Yorke. Afterward Ioannes Bachothorp, and now thys Armachanus, of whom here presently we do entreate. And after him agayne Iohn Wyckleffe, of whom (Christ wyllyng) we wil speak hereafter. Ex vvaldeno MarginaliaFriers that wryte against Armachanus.Agaynst thys foresayd Armachanus wrot diuers friars, Roger Conewey a Franciscan, Iohn Heyldesham Carmelite, Galfridus Hardeby frier Augustine. Also Frier Engelbert a Dominican, in his booke intituled, Defensorum priuilegiorum, and diuers other. MarginaliaTestified by certayne Englishmē which are alyue haue it.I credibly heare of certayne old Irish Bibles translated long synce into the Irysh tong, which if it be true, it is not other lyke, but to be the doing of this Armachanus
This information about the Irish Bibles is Foxe's own addition to the account, as is his completely unfounded surmise that Fitzralph had something to do with them.
MarginaliaPope Vrbane. 5
1360.
Vrbane cōplayneth that no promotion would fall vpon hym.After the death
Foxe’s version of the sermon of Nicole Oresme is taken entirely from Matthias Flacius, Catalogus testium veritatis (Strasbourg, 1562), pp. 512-519. Nicole Oresme (c. 1320-1382) was a cleric and scholar, most famous today for his writings on mathematics, astronomy and economics. He was also a protégé of Charles V and John the Good. In preaching this sermon to Urban V, Oresme was preaching to the choir; Urban vigorously tried to reform the abuses Oresme described. Ironically, the more reform-minded medieval clerics denounced ecclesiastical abuses, the more they supplied Foxe and Flacius with material to characterize the papacy and the medieval church as inherently evil.
[Back to Top]Thomas S. Freeman
University of Sheffield
Foxe is taking his account of Urban V from Bale, Catalogus, pp. 437-8. Guillaume de Gimoard, who became Urban V, was a Frenchman with a distinguished career as a scholar and a diplomat. Because England, at this time controlled much of what is now south-western France, Guillaume’s father was an English subject, but he was not English.
[Back to Top]At this time, the papal court was in Avignon, not Rome.
This description of the wars of Urban V comes from Sabellicus, in his Enneads (see Sabellicus, Opera omnia [Basel, 1560], cols. 817-21). Bale had referred to this account (Catalogus, p. 438), but he had not provided the details. Foxe felt that the issue of papal territorial aggression was sufficiently important for him to look up Bale’s source for himself.
[Back to Top]This is Cardinal Gil Álvarez Caurillo de Albornoz, whom Pope Urban V placed in charge of restoring papal control over the papal territories in Italy. While the papacy was in Avignon, its control over central Italy had been lost..
This description of the wars of Urban V comes from Sabellicus, in his Enneads (see Sabellicus, Opera omnia [Basel, 1560], cols. 817-21). Bale had referred to this account (Catalogus, p. 438), but he had not provided the details. Foxe felt that the issue of papal territorial aggression was sufficiently important for him to look up Bale’s source for himself.
[Back to Top]Everything that follows to the end of Oresme’s sermon is a direct translation of Matthias Flacius, Catalogus testium veritatis (Strasbourg, 1562), pp. 512-519.
Actually 1363.
MarginaliaA Sermō made before the popeIVxta est salus mea, vt veniat, et iustitia. &c. that is: My sauing health is neare at hand to come, and my righteousnes to be reuealed. &c. Esay. 56. MarginaliaEsay. 56.
The world deuided into two sortes of men before the incarnation of Christ.After the sentence of S. Paule Rom. 2. and in diuers other places, before the natiuitie of Christ: þe whole world was diuided into two sortes of men, the Iewes and Gentils. The Iewes who wayted for the opening of the doore of Paradise, by the bloud of the sauiour to come. The Gentiles, who yet sitting in darkenes, were to be called to light, and to be iustified by faith, as is written. Rom. 5.
This saluation pertaynyng both to the Iewe and Gentile, God promised before time to the fathers by the prophets, to styr vp the desyre thereof in their hartes the more, and to increase their firme hope and fayth in the same. As fyrst in Mich. 6. the voyce of the Lord crieth: Health and saluation shall be to all mē which feare my name. And Esay. xlvi. I wil geue in Sion saluation, and in Ierusalem my glory. &c. with diuers suche other places lyke. MarginaliaRom. 12.And forsomuch as hope manye times whych is deferred, doth afflict the soule, and conceiueth wearines of long deferring: He therefore prophesieng of the nerenes of the comming therof, sayth moreouer. Esay. xliij. his time is neare at hand to come. Also Abac. ij. He wyll come, and will not tary, with manye suche other places mo. So then the holy fathers being in Limbo, loked and hoped that he should bring out them that sat boūde, and which in the house of prison sat in darkenes, as is redde Esay. xli. Then the time drew on, in which came the fulnes of the Gentiles, and in which the lord would declare the riches of this mistery being hidden from the worlde, and from generations, Colos. 1. Wherfore the Lorde in this text doth both certifie our fathers of the commyng of our sauiour, & doth comfort them touching the nearenes thereof, and also teacheth the iustification of the Gentiles by fayth aproching now neare at hand, according to the woordes of my text, Iuxta est, salus mea. &c. Which wordes were fulfilled then, what tyme the lord did make manifest hys saluation, and dyd reueale hys righteousnes in the sight of all the Gentiles. MarginaliaDiuision.And is deuided in three partes. Of which the fyrst speaketh of the nearenes of hys comming, where is sayd, Iuxta est salus. &c. MarginaliaIuxta est.The second concerneth the mistery of the aduēt
[Back to Top]