MarginaliaThe iust hand of God vpon a cruell persecutour.fetters, and so beyng inclosed in an yron grate (whom before all Græcia coulde not holde) was ledde aboute and shewed throughe all Asia, to bee skorned and laught at: and moreouer was vsed in steade of a footestoole to Tamerlanes, MarginaliaBaiazetes made for a blocke for Tamerlanes to get vpõ his horse.or a blocke, as often as he mounted vpon his horse. Some adde also, that he was made lyke a dogge to feade vnder Tamerlanes table. The tyranny of which Baiazetes against þe Christians, as it was not much vnlike to the crueltie of Valerianus the Romaine Emperour MarginaliaVide supra. pag. 105.aboue mentioned, pag. 105. so neither was the example of his punishemēt much discrepant. For as Sapores kyng of þe Persians did then with Valerianus in tyme of the viij. persecution of the primatiue church: so likewise was Baiazetes this persecutor worthely hãdled by Tamerlanes K. of þe Parthiãs, as in maner aboue said.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaThe great victoryes of Tamerlanes in Asia.Tamerlanes after this conquest, passed with his army into Mesopotamia, to Ægypt, and all Syria, where he victoriously subduyng the Cities and munitions of the Turkes, at length also conquered Damascus. In his sieges his maner was, þe first day to go all in white attire, the secõd day in red, the third day in blacke: signifyeng therby mercy þe first day to thē that yelded, þe second day þe sword, the third day fier and ashes. At last after great victories and spoyles gottē of the Turkes, he returned into his countrey agayne, and there dyed. an. 1402.
[Back to Top]Seb. Munsterus writyng of this Tamerlanes
The passages on the numbers in Timur's army, on his conquests, andon his sons losing what their father had conquered, are taken from Sebastian Munster,Cosmographiae universalis (Basel, 1559), pp. 959-60.
In the meane tyme Baiazetes in the second yeare of his captiuitie
Actually Bayezid died on 9 March 1403, less than seven months after his defeat.
These passages are taken from Casper Peucer, Chronicon Carionis(Wittenburg, 1580), pp. 645-6 and they make a confused situation even more confusing. Bayezid's sons were: Süleyman (Calepine), Isa (Jesus; pace Peucer and Foxe there was only one son with this name), Mehmed, Musa (Moses) and Mustapha. There was no son named Hälil (or Hali). There was no son named 'Musulman'; if this is meant to be Mehmed, then the account in Peucer and Foxe is inaccurate from beginning to end. After Timur's victory, the Ottoman terriories were divided. Süleyman, the eldest, ruled the European territories, Mehmed, the youngest, ruled what is now northeastern Turkey. Isa ruled western Turkey. Musa and Mustapha had been taken prisoner along with Bayezid. Musa eventually fell into the hands of his brother Mehmed. Mustapha presumably died in Timur's custody. In 1403, Mehmed defeated Isa, seized his lands and drove him into exile. Isa secured Byzantine aid and re-invaded his former territories in 1404. Mehmed defeated him again, and Isa fled and disappeared from history. Later that year Süleyman invaded Turkey and occupied Isa's lands, driving Mehmed back into northeastern Turkey. In 1409, Mehmed took revenge against Süleyman by releasing their brother Musa and sending him against Süleyman. Musa entered into a marriage alliance with the Voyvode of Wallachia and, with troops supplied by his father-in-law, invaded Süleyman's teritories. Süleyman withdrew his armies from Turkey to deal with the threat and Mehmed overran these territories.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaCalepinus the fifth after Ottomannus.CAlepinus, or Celebinus was the sonne of Baiazetes
The account of Süleyman (Calepine) is taken largely from Casper Peucer, Chronicon Carionis (Wittenburg, 1580), pp. 645-6 with some material from Cuspinian. Despite Foxe's hailing him as an Ottoman emperor, Süleyman, is not generally considered one as he never ruled over the entire empire.
The Partians were actually a nomadic people who created an empireextending from the Euphrates, which flourished from the second century BCE tothe the third century AD. Peucer and Foxe are using a classical term to describeTimur's armies.
Actually Süleyman (Calepine) and his brother Mehmed retreated fromthe battle and abandoned their father. Neither brother was captured.
Foxe is taking his account from Johannes Cuspinian, De Turcorumorigine (Antwerp, 1541), fos. 14v-16v. Actually there was no such battle; it is probably a confused version of Sigismund's defeat at Nicopolis. Cuspinian admitsthat he does not know whether this battle took place in Murad's reign. This is from Johannes Cuspinian, De Turcorum origine (Antwerp, 1541), fo. 16v .
[Back to Top]This is from Johannes Cuspinian, De Turcorum origine (Antwerp, 1541), fo. 16v.
Musa (see C 177/35) caught Süleyman by surprise and defeated him. Musa's troops caught up with Süleyman as he was fleeing and killed him. This was in 1411, not 1410.
MarginaliaOrchanes and Moses hys vncle.AFter the captiuitie
Foxe took this very garbled account of Orhan and Musa from CasperPeucer, Chronicon Carionis (Wittenburg, 1580), pp. 646-7.
These passages are taken from Casper Peucer, Chronicon Carionis(Wittenburg, 1580), pp. 645-6 and they make a confused situation even more confusing. Bayezid's sons were: Süleyman (Calepine), Isa (Jesus; pace Peucer and Foxe there was only one son with this name), Mehmed, Musa (Moses) and Mustapha. There was no son named Hälil (or Hali). There was no son named 'Musulman'; if this is meant to be Mehmed, then the account in Peucer and Foxe, is inaccurate from beginning to end. After Timur's victory, the Ottoman terriories were divided. Süleyman, the eldest, ruled the European territories, Mehmed, the youngest, ruled what is now northeastern Turkey. Isa ruled western Turkey. Musa and Mustapha had been taken prisoner along with Bayezid. Musa eventually fell into the hands of his brother Mehmed. Mustapha presumably died in Timur's custody. In 1403, Mehmed defeated Isa, seized his lands and drove him into exile. Isa secured Byzantine aid and re-invaded his former territories in 1404. Mehmed defeated him again, and Isa fled and disappeared from history. Later that year Süleyman invaded Turkey and occupied Isa's lands, driving Mehmed back into northeastern Turkey. In 1409, Mehmed took revenge against Süleyman by releasing their brother Musa and sending him against Süleyman. Musa entered into a marriage alliance with the Voyvode of Wallachia and, with troops supplied by his father-in-law, invaded Süleyman's teritories. Süleyman withdrew his armies from Turkey to deal with the threat and Mehmed overran these territories.
[Back to Top]Orhan was the eldest son of Süleyman (Calepine), the eldest son of Bayezid. Musa (Moses) was Süleyman's brother, who defeated and killed him. After Süleyman's death, the Byzantine emperor, who had Orhan in custody, released him to make war on Musa. Musa retalitated by un-successfully besieging Constantinople in 1411. The same year he also defeated his brother Mehmed. In 1413, however, Mehmed defeated Musa and killed him. Mehmed then defeated Orhan, captured him and had him blinded.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaMahometes the vii. after Ottomannus.THis Mahumetes
This account of Mehmed I is taken from Casper Peucer, Chronicon Carionis (Frankfurt, 1594), p. 1205. Mehmed was the youngest son of Bayezid, Süleyman (Calepine) was his elder brother.
Mehmed I reigned from 1413-21.
MarginaliaAmurathes the viii. after Ottomannus.AMurathes, as Philelphus sayth, was the sonne of Celebinus, as Laonicus Chalcondyles testifieth, of Mahumetes
Most of this account of Murad II - including the citations of the twoauthors in this passage - is taken from Casper Peucer, Chronicon Carionis (Wittenburg,1580), pp. 647-51. Portions of it are taken from Christophe Richer's account of the Ottomans (via Bibliander's edition of the Koran) and Johannes Cuspinian's history of the Turks.
'Mustapha' was an imposter, supported by the Byzantine emperor, who claimed to be the son of Bayezid who was taken prisoner by Timur. After considerable initial success, he was defeated and captured in 1422. He was not strangled with a bowstring (a punishment reserved for royalty) but instead hanged as a common criminal.
[Back to Top]