The lack of pagination for this section (at least in the 1570 edition where it first appeared) is almost certainly because it was a late insertion into thetext. It is also almost certain that this section was a response to the revolt of thenorthern earls in 1569 and the papal deposition of Elizabeth at the beginning of 1570. This section is illustrated with a dozen woodcuts depicting historical, or putatively historical, instances of papal dominance over secular rulers. All but one of thesewoodcuts was newly created, apparently for this section. (The woodcut depicting thehumiliation of Henry IV at Canossa, which had been used earlier in the volume, wasreused in this section). The expense involved in creating these woodcuts suggeststhat Day may have received financial support for producing this section. It iscertainly true that Archbishop Parker aided Foxe in researching this section.
[Back to Top]Yet while the carving of the woodcuts must have taken weeks, if not months,it would appear that the text for this section was composed fairly quickly. This section consists of a summary of the rise of the papacy, an exegesis of passages in St Paul's second letter to the Thessalonians identifying the Antichrist, as well as a summary of papal attempts to depose and dominate European rulers. This sectionconcludes with 'The Image of Antichrist', which, in turn, is an exact reprinting of ananonymous work, A solemne contestation of diverse popes for the advancing of their supremacy (London, 1560), STC 20114, which had been printed by John Daya decade earlier. (For a discussion of this work, and an argument that Foxe himselfcompiled it, see Thomas S. Freeman, 'A solemne contestation of diverse popes: A Work by John Foxe?', English Language Notes 31[1994], pp. 35-42). Apart from nuggets of information contributed by others, there is littlenew research in this section, which largely reiterates episodes already described in theActs and Monuments. What is striking, however, are the important borrowings, acknowledged and unacknowledged, from William Tyndale's Practice of Prelates. Foxe did not normally cite Tyndale's work, probably because he had access to better and more detailed sources. But in this section, Foxe gives an indication of the impact that Tyndale's interpretation of history had on his thought.
[Back to Top]Thomas S. Freeman
University of Sheffield
The phrase, 'paynted out in tables' means illustrated with woodcuts.
This title quotes 2 Thess 2:4, which was understood in the sixteenthcentury as a prophecy of Antichrist.
MarginaliaThe Martyrdome of good Bishops vnder wicked Emperors in the primitiue Church.IN þe Table of þe primitiue Church aboue described, hath bene (gentle reader) set forth & exhibited before thine eies the greuous afflictions and sorowful tormentes, which through Gods secret sufferaunce, fell vpon the true Saintes and members of Christes Church in that tyme, especially vppon the good Byshops, Ministers, and teachers of the flocke: of whom some were scourged, some beheaded, some crucified, some burned, some had their eyes put out, some one way some an other miserably consumed: which dayes of woeful calamitie cōtinued (as is foreshewed) nere the space of CCC. yeares. Duryng which tyme the deare spouse & electe Church of God, beyng sharpely assaulted on euery side, had small rest, no ioy, nor outward safetie in this present world, but in much bitternes of hart, in cōtinuall teares & mournyng vnder the crosse passed ouer their daies, being spoiled, imprisoned, cōtemned, reuiled, famished, tormēted and Martyred euery where. Who neither durst well tary at home for feare and dread: and much lesse durst come abroad for the enemies, but onely by night, when they assembled as they might, sometymes to sing Psalmes & Hymnes together. In all which their dreadfull daungers, & sorowfull afflictions, notwithstandyng the goodnes of the Lord left thē not desolate: but the more their outward tribulations did increase, the more their inward cōsolations dyd abound: and the farther of they seemed from the ioyes of this life, the more present was the Lord with them with grace & fortitude to confirme and reioyse their soules. And though their possessionsand riches in this world were lost & spoyled: yet were they enriched with heauēly giftes and treasures from aboue an hundreth fold. MarginaliaThe true riches of the Church described.Then was the true Religion truly felt in hart. Then was Christianitie not in outward appearance shewed, but in inward affection receaued, and the true image of the church not in outward shew pretensed, but in her perfect state effectuall. Thē was þe name & feare of God true in hart, not in lippes alone dwellyng. Fayth then was feruēt, zeale ardent, prayer not swymmyng in the lyppes, but groned out to God from the bottome of the spirit. Then was no pride in the Church, nor laysure to seeke riches, nor tyme to keepe them. Contention for trifles was thē so far from Christians, that well were they when they could meete to pray together agaynst the deuill, author of all dissention. Briefly the whole Church of Christ Iesus with all the members therof, the farder it was from the tipe and shape of this world, the nerer it was to the blessed respect of God fauour and supportation.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaThe first rising of the Bishops of Rome.AFter this long time of trouble, it pleased the Lord at length mercifully to looke vpon the Saintes & seruantes of his sonne, to release their captiuitie, to release their miserie, & to bind vp þe old Dragon þe deuill, which so long vexed thē. Wherby the Church began to aspire to some more libertie: and þe Bishops which before were as abiectes, vtterly cōtemned of Emperors, through the prouidence of God (which disposeth all thinges in his tyme after his owne will) began now of Emperours to be estemed and had in price. Furthermore as Emperors grew more in deuotion, so the Bishops more and more were exalted, not onely in fauor, but also preferred vnto honor, in somuch that in short space they became not quartor masters, but rather half Emperours with Emperours.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaThe spirituall riches of the Church turned to worldly riches.After this in proces of tyme, as riches and worldly wealth crept into the Clergy, and that the deuill had poured his venome into the Church (as the voyce was