Marginalia1552. preparation of all parties was there throughout the whole Citie, as in such cases is accustomed, and all places were filled with myrth and gladnes. In this great assembly of the whole kingdome, William Gardinar, who, albeit he dyd not greatly esteeme such kynde of spectacles, yet beyng allured through the fame and report therof, was their also, cõmyng thether early in the mornyng, to the intent hee might haue the more oportunitie and better place to behold and see.
[Back to Top]The houre beyng come, they flocked into the church with great solemnitie and pompe: the kyng first, and then euery estate in order. The greater persones, the more ceremonies were about them. After all thinges were set in order, they went forward to the celebratyng of their Masse:MarginaliaA Popishe celebration of a mariage for that alone serueth for all purposes. The Cardinall did execute, wt much singing and orgayne playing.
These is a hint here that Foxe did not approve of organs and choral music during church services.
In this deliberation and aduise his minde being fully setled, and thinkyng that the matter ought not to bee any longer differred, he renounced the worlde,MarginaliaWilliam Gardiner cleareth hys bookes of accomptes. making vp all his accomptes so exactly (as well of that whiche was due vnto him, as that which he ought vnto others) that no mã could iustly aske so much as one farthyng.MarginaliaWilliam Gardiner continuing in watchyng and prayer. Whiche thing done, he continued night and day in prayer callyng vpon God, and cõtinual meditatiõ of the Scriptures, that scarsely he would take any meate by day, or slepe by night, or that most, aboue an houre or two of rest in the night, as Pendigrace his felowe, companion both at bedde and bourde being yet alyue, can testifie.
This acknowledgement that Pendigrace was Foxe's source first appears in Rerum, p. 206. For a possible identification of 'Pentigrace' as one Thomas Pendigrace, see Thomas S. Freeman and Marcello J. Borges, '"A grave and heinous incident against our holy Catholic Faith": Two Accounts of William Gardiner's Desecration of the Portuguese Roayl Chapel in 1552', Historical Research 69 (1966).
[Back to Top]MarginaliaWilliã Gardiners aduised preparation to the accomplishment of his purpose. The Sonday came againe to be celebrate
The wedding which putatively inspired Gardiner's act of sacrilege took place on 4 December 1552 (not September as Foxe states); the act of sacrilege itself took place on 11 December.
Interestingly, a witness testified before the tribunal investigating Gardiner that, at the time of his act of sacrilege, he was 'a man of respectable appearance' ['um homem bem disposito'] (Thomas S. Freeman and Marcello J. Borges, '"A grave and heinous incident against our holy Catholic Faith": Two Accounts of William Gardiner's Desecration of the Portuguese Royal Chapel in 1552', Historical Research 69 [1996], p. 5).
[Back to Top]Foxe is in error on this point. The Cardinal-Infante Henrique was unquestionably present at the service, but testimony at Gardiner's trial reveals that a royal chaplain was celebrating Mass (Thomas S. Freeman and Marcello J. Borges, '"A grave and heinous incident against our holy Catholic faith": Two Accounts of William Gardiner's Desecration of the Portuguese Royal Chapel in 1552', Historical Research 69 [1996], p. 13).
[Back to Top]In a pastoral letter written after Gardiner's sacrilege, the Archbishop of Lisbon wrote that Gardiner had crushed the Host with one hand and overturned the chalice with the other (I. da Rosa Pereira, 'O Desacato na Capella Real em 1552 e o processo do calvinista inglês peranto Ordinário de Lisboa', Annais da Academia Portuguesa da Historia 29 (1984), pp. 618-19).
[Back to Top]Witnesses testified at Gardiner's trial that the crowd attacked Gardiner and were only stopped from killing him by the personal intervention of João III (Thomas S. Freeman and Marcello J. Borges, '"A grave and heinous incident against our holy Catholic Faith": Two Accounts of William Gardiner's Desecration of the Portuguese Royal Chapel in 1552', Historical Research 69 (1996), pp. 14-15).
[Back to Top]MarginaliaWilliam Gardiner brought before the kyng. After the tumult was ceased, he was brought vnto the king: by whom he was demaunded what countrey man he was, and howe he durst be so bold to worke such a contumely agaynst his Maiestie, and the Sacramentes of the Church? He aunswered:
To accept that this speech actually took place, one must accept that a person who seriously wounded by an enraged mob would have had the presence of mind to deliver this oration and that the king, anxious to forestall the mob, would have listened patiently while he delivered it. It is almost certain that Foxe wrote this little speech himself. His reason for doing so was clear. The martyrologist was anxious to clear Gardiner (and Protestants in general) of any taint of disrespect for monarchs or sedition.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaThe suspition of the Portugales vpon the facte of William Gardiner. When they heard that he was an Englishe man and called to remembraunce how the Religion was restored by K. Edward, they were by and by brought in suspition, that he had bene suborned by Englishmen thus to doe, to mocke and deride their religion. Wherfore they were the more earnest vpon hym to know who was the author and procurour that he should commit that act.MarginaliaThe aūswere of William Gardiner to the false suspition of the Portugalls. Vnto whom he aunswered, desiring them that they would cõceaue no such suspitiõ of hym, for somuch as he was not moued thereunto by any man, but onely by his owne conscience. For otherwise there was no man vnder þe heauē, for whose sake he would haue put himselfe into so manifest daūger: but that he ought this seruice first vnto God, and secondarily vnto their saluatiõ: wherfore if he had done any thyng which were displeasaunt vnto them, they ought to impute it vnto no man, but vnto themselues, which so vnreuerently vsed the holy Supper of the Lord vnto so great Idolatry, not without great ignominie vnto the Church, violation of the sacraments, and the perill of their owne soules, without they repented.
[Back to Top]Whilest that he spake these wyth many other thinges more vnto this effect very grauely and stoutly, the bloud ran abundantly out of the wounde, so that he was ready to faint. Whereupon Surgeons were sent for, whereby he might be cured if it were possible, and be reserued for further examination, & more greuous torment. For they were fully perswaded that this deede had diuers abbettors and setters on: which was the cause that all the other Englishemen also in the same Citie came into suspition, and were commaunded to safe custody.MarginaliaPendigrace bedfellow to W. Gardiner imprisoned vpon suspition. Amõgest whom, Pendigrace, because he was his bedfelow, was greuously tormented & examined more then the residue, and scarcely was deliuered after two yeares imprisonment. The other were much sooner set at libertie at the intercession of a certayne Duke.
It is worth noting that, despite Portuguese suspicions that Gardiner was not acting alone, the incident did not disturb either diplomatic or trade relations between England and Portugal.
Actually Portuguese; Foxe seems to have believed that the language of Portugal was Spanish.
Gardiner's examinations were conducted in Latin but recorded in Portuguese.
But they not beyng therwith satisfied, added an other straunge kynde of torment, which (as I suppose) passeth the Bull of Phalaris. MarginaliaThe Bull of Phalaris a certaine tyranne, was a kind of torment made of brasse lyke Bull with fire vnder it to torment such as were put into it, and make them to roare like a Bull. Because there shoulde no kynde of extreme crueltie be left vnassayd,
The Portuguese records state that torture was applied to Gardiner, but they do not describe the tortures. The tortures described by Foxe have a grim plausibility since conventional tortures could not be used on a severely wounded man.
Thus at the last, when all tormentes & tormenters were weried, and that it did nothing at all preuaile to go this way to worke, they asked him whether he did not repent hys wicked and seditious deede.MarginaliaWilliam Gardiner not repēting hys fact. As touching the deede aunswered that it was so farre of that he did repent, that if it were to do agayne, he thought he should do the same. But as touching the maner of the deede, he was not a litle sory that it was done in the kyngs presence to the disquietnes of hys minde. Howbeit þt was not to be imputed vnto him, which neither enterprised or thought vpon any such matter, but rather to be ascribed vnto þe kyng, in that he hauing power, woulde not prohibite so great Idolatrye vsed amonge hys people. Thys he spake wyth great feruencie.
[Back to Top]After they had vsed all kynde of torments, and saw that there could nothing more be gathered of him, and also that through his woundes & paines he could not long liue, they brought him three dayes after to execution:MarginaliaThe right hand of William Gardiner cut of in the vestry. And first of all, bringing him into the Vestry, cut of his right hand, which he taking vp with his left hãd kissed.MarginaliaThe left hand of William Gardiner cut of in the Market place. Thē he was brought into the market place, whereas his other hand also was cut of: which he kneling downe vpon the grounde, also kissed. These thinges thus done after the maner and fashion of Spaine, his armes being bounde behinde him, and his feete vnder the horse belly, he was caried to the place of executiõ.
[Back to Top]