Thematic Divisions in Book 11
1. The Martyrdom of Rogers 2. The Martyrdom of Saunders 3. Saunders' Letters 4. Hooper's Martyrdom 5. Hooper's Letters 6. Rowland Taylor's Martyrdom 7. Becket's Image and other events 8. Miles Coverdale and the Denmark Letters 9. Bonner and Reconciliation 10. Judge Hales 11. The Martyrdom of Thomas Tomkins 12. The Martyrdom of William Hunter 13. The Martyrdom of Higbed and Causton 14. The Martyrdom of Pigot, Knight and Laurence 15. Robert Farrar's Martyrdom 16. The Martyrdom of Rawlins/Rowland White17. The Restoration of Abbey Lands and other events in Spring 155518. The Providential Death of the Parson of Arundel 19. The Martyrdom of John Awcocke 20. The Martyrdom of George Marsh 21. The Letters of George Marsh 22. The Martyrdom of William Flower 23. The Martyrdom of Cardmaker and Warne 24. Letters of Warne and Cardmaker 25. The Martyrdom of Ardley and Simpson 26. John Tooly 27. The Examination of Robert Bromley [nb This is part of the Tooly affair]28. The Martyrdom of Thomas Haukes 29. Letters of Haukes 30. The Martyrdom of Thomas Watts 31. Censorship Proclamation 32. Our Lady' Psalter 33. Martyrdom of Osmund, Bamford, Osborne and Chamberlain34. The Martyrdom of John Bradford 35. Bradford's Letters 36. William Minge 37. James Trevisam 38. The Martyrdom of John Bland 39. The Martyrdom of Frankesh, Middleton and Sheterden 40. Sheterden's Letters 41. Examinations of Hall, Wade and Polley 42. Martyrdom of Christopher Wade 43. Nicholas Hall44. Margery Polley45. Martyrdom of Carver and Launder 46. Martyrdom of Thomas Iveson 47. John Aleworth 48. Martyrdom of James Abbes 49. Martyrdom of Denley, Newman and Pacingham 50. Richard Hooke 51. Martyrdom of William Coker, et al 52. Martyrdom of George Tankerfield, et al 53. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Smith 54. Martyrdom of Harwood and Fust 55. Martyrdom of William Haile 56. George King, Thomas Leyes and John Wade 57. William Andrew 58. Martyrdom of Robert Samuel 59. Samuel's Letters 60. William Allen 61. Martyrdom of Roger Coo 62. Martyrdom of Thomas Cobb 63. Martyrdom of Catmer, Streater, Burwood, Brodbridge, Tutty 64. Martyrdom of Hayward and Goreway 65. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Glover 66. Cornelius Bungey 67. John and William Glover 68. Martyrdom of Wolsey and Pigot 69. Life and Character of Nicholas Ridley 70. Ridley's Letters 71. Life of Hugh Latimer 72. Latimer's Letters 73. Ridley and Latimer Re-examined and Executed74. More Letters of Ridley 75. Life and Death of Stephen Gardiner 76. Martyrdom of Webb, Roper and Park 77. William Wiseman 78. James Gore 79. Examinations and Martyrdom of John Philpot 80. Philpot's Letters 81. Martyrdom of Thomas Whittle, Barlett Green, et al 82. Letters of Thomas Wittle 83. Life of Bartlett Green 84. Letters of Bartlett Green 85. Thomas Browne 86. John Tudson 87. John Went 88. Isobel Foster 89. Joan Lashford 90. Five Canterbury Martyrs 91. Life and Martyrdom of Cranmer 92. Letters of Cranmer 93. Martyrdom of Agnes Potten and Joan Trunchfield 94. Persecution in Salisbury Maundrell, Coberly and Spicer 95. William Tyms, et al 96. Letters of Tyms 97. The Norfolk Supplication 98. Martyrdom of John Harpole and Joan Beach 99. John Hullier 100. Hullier's Letters 101. Christopher Lister and five other martyrs 102. Hugh Lauerocke and John Apprice 103. Katherine Hut, Elizabeth Thacknell, et al 104. Thomas Drury and Thomas Croker 105. Thomas Spicer, John Deny and Edmund Poole 106. Persecution of Winson and Mendlesam 107. Gregory Crow 108. William Slech 109. Avington Read, et al 110. Wood and Miles 111. Adherall and Clement 112. A Merchant's Servant Executed at Leicester 113. Thirteen Burnt at Stratford-le-Bow114. Persecution in Lichfield 115. Hunt, Norrice, Parret 116. Martyrdom of Bernard, Lawson and Foster 117. Examinations of John Fortune118. John Careless 119. Letters of John Careless 120. Martyrdom of Julius Palmer 121. Agnes Wardall 122. Peter Moone and his wife 123. Guernsey Martyrdoms 124. Dungate, Foreman and Tree 125. Martyrdom of Thomas More126. Martyrdom of John Newman127. Examination of John Jackson128. Examination of John Newman 129. Martyrdom of Joan Waste 130. Martyrdom of Edward Sharpe 131. Four Burnt at Mayfield at Sussex 132. John Horne and a woman 133. William Dangerfield 134. Northampton Shoemaker 135. Prisoners Starved at Canterbury 136. More Persecution at Lichfield
Critical Apparatus for this Page
Commentary on the Text
Names and Places on this Page
Unavailable for this Edition
1458 [1432]

Q. Mary. B. Hooper called vp to London, his examination before the Byshops.

Marginalia1555. February.dently by this: that euen as he was hated of none but of them which were euyl, so yet the worst of them al could not reproue his life in any one iote.

I haue now declared his vsage and behaueour abroade in the publike affayres of the Church: MarginaliaThe order and gouernaunce of M. Hopers house.and certaynly there appeared in hym at home no lesse example of a worthy Prelates life. For although he bestowed and cōuerted the most part of his care vpon the publke flocke and congregation of Christ, for the which also he spent his bloud: yet neuerthelesse there lacked no prouision in hym, to bring vp his own children in learnyng, and good maners:MarginaliaThe care of M. Hooper in instructing his family. euen so muche, that ye could not discerne whether he deserued more prayse for his fatherly vsage at home, or for his Bishoply doinges abroade. For euery where he kept one Religion in one vniforme doctrine and integritie. So that if you entred into the Bishops pallace, you would suppose to haue entred into some Church or Temple. In euery corner thereof there was some smel of vertue, good example, honest conuersation, and reading of holy Scriptures. There was not to be seene in his house any Courtly roysting or idlenesse: no pompe at all, no dishonest woorde, no swearyng could there be heard.  

Commentary   *   Close

A passage in Rerum (p. 282) and 1563, calling for bishops voluntarily to reduce their incomes and spending was dropped from 1570 and all subsequent editions. The Rerum, however, goes on to criticize the clerical tax known as 'first fruits', stating that it forced bishops to try to raise revenue.

[Back to Top]

As for the reuenewes of both his Bishoprikes, although they dyd not greatly exceede, as the matter was handled: MarginaliaThe hospitalitie of M. Hoper.yet if any thing surmounted therof, he pursed nothing, but bestowed it in hospitalitie. Twise I was (as I remember) in his house in Worcester, where in his common hall, I sawe a table spread with good store of meate, and beset ful of beggers and poore folke: and I asking his seruants what this meant,  

Commentary   *   Close

An interesting biographical detail is revealed about Foxe: he was in Worcester diocese during Hooper's tenure as bishop. These must have been visits, as Foxe lived at the Howard family manor in Reigate, Surrey, during this period.

they told me that euery day their Lord & masters manner was, to haue customably to dinner, a certaine number of poore folke of the said citie by course, who were serued by foure at a messe, with hot and wholesome meates: and when they were serued (being afore examined by hym or his deputies of the Lordes prayer, the articles of their fayth, and ten Commaundementes) then he hym selfe sate downe to dinner, and not before.

[Back to Top]

After this sort and maner, M. Hooper executed the office of a most carefull and vigilant Pastor, by the space of two yeares and more, so long as the state of Religion in kyng Edwardes tyme dyd safely florishe and take place: and woulde God that all other Bishops would vse the like diligence, care, and obseruance in their function. MarginaliaM. Hooper called vp to Londō at Queene Maryes cōming in.After this king Edward beyng dead, & Mary beyng crowned queene of England, Religion being subuerted & changed, this good Bishop was one of the first that was sent for by a Pursiuant to be at London, and that for two causes.

[Back to Top]

MarginaliaTwo causes why M. Hooper was called vp.First, to answere to Doct. Heath, then appoynted Bishop of that Dioces, who was before in kyng Edwardes dayes depriued therof for Papistry.

Secondaryly to render account to Doctor Boner Bishop of London, for that he in king Edwardes tyme was one of his accusers, in that he shewed hym selfe not conformable to such ordinances as were prescribed to hym by the kyng and his Counsayle, openly at Paules Crosse. And although the said M. Hooper was not ignoraunt of the e-euyls that should happen towardes hym (for he was admonished by certayne of his frendes to get hym away, and shift for hym selfe) yet he would not preuent them, but tarryed styll, saying: once I dyd flee and tooke me to my feete: but now, because I am called to this place and vocation, I am throughly perswaded to tary, and to liue and dye with my sheepe.

[Back to Top]

And when at the day of his appearaunce (which was the first of September)  

Commentary   *   Close

Hooper had made an earlier appearance before the Privy Council on 29 August (APC IV, p. 335).

he was come to London, before he could come to the foresaid Doctor Heath and Boner, he was intercepted & commaunded violently against his wyll to appeare before the Queene and her Counsayle, MarginaliaM. Hooper refused to flye away.to answeare to certayne bondes and obligations, wherein they saide he was bounde vnto her. And when he came before them,MarginaliaM. Hooper commeth vp to London. Winchester by & by receyued hym very opprobriously, and rayling and rating of hym, accused hym of Religion. He againe freely and boldly tolde his tale, and purged hym selfe. MarginaliaM. Hooper charged to aunswere the Queene for bonds of det.But in fine it came to this conclusion: that he was by them commaunded to ward (it beyng declared vnto him at his departure, that the cause of his imprisonment was onely for certayne summes of money, for the which he was indebted to the Queene, and not for Religiō.)MarginaliaM. Hooper commaunded to warde. This howe false and vntrue it was, shall hereafter in his place more plainly appeare.

[Back to Top]

The next yeare, beyng. 1554. the 19. of Marche, he was called againe to appeare before Winchester & other þe Queenes Commissioners: where, what for the Bishop, and what for the vnruly multitude, when he coulde not be permitted to pleade his cause, MarginaliaM. Hooper depriued of his Bishopricks.he was depriued of his Bishoprikes. Which how, and in what order it was done, here now foloweth to be seene by the testimonie and report of one, which being present at the doing, committed the same

[Back to Top]

to writyng.

¶ A letter or report of a certayne godly man declaryng the order of M. Hoopers depriuation frō his Bishoprike. An. 1554. March. 19.  
Commentary   *   Close

The London diarist Henry Machyn states that Hooper was deprived on 17 March 1554 (Machyn, p. 58).

MarginaliaA letter reporting the order of M. Hoopers depriuation.FOr so much as a rumor is spread abroade of the talke had at my Lord Chancelors, betwene hym with other Commissioners there appoynted, and master Hooper, cleane contrary to the veritie and truth therof in deed, and therfore to be iudged rather to be rysen of malice, for the discredityng of the truth by false suggestions and euyll reportes, then otherwise: I thought it my duetie, beyng present thereat my selfe, in writyng to set forth the whole effecte of the same: partly that the veritie therof may be knowen to the doubtfull people, and partly also to aduertise them, how vncharitably master Hooper was handled at their handes: which with all humilitie vsed hym selfe towardes them, desiryng that with pacience he might haue ben permitted to speake: assuryng all men, that where I stoode in a mammering and doubt, whiche of these two Religions to haue credited, either that set forth by the kinges maiestie that dead is, or els that nowe maynteyned by the Queenes maiestie, their vnreuerend behaueour towardes M. Hooper, doth moue me the rather to credite his doctrine, thē that which they with raylyng & cruell wordes defended, considering that Christ was so handled before. And that this which I haue written here, was the effect of their talke, as I acknowledge it to be true my selfe: so I appeale to all the hearers consciences, that there were present (so they put affection away) for the witnes to the same.

[Back to Top]
¶ The Bishops of Wint. of London, of Duresme, of Landaffe, of Chichester, sate as Commissioners.

MarginaliaMaister Hooper examined before the Commissioners.

Lord Chauncelour.

AT M. Hoopers commyng in, the Lord Chauncelor asked whether he was maryed.

Hooper. Yea, my Lord, & wyl not be vnmaryed, tyl death vnmary me.

Duresme. That is matter enough to depriue you.

Hooper. That it is not my Lord, except ye do agaynst the lawe.

The matter concernyng maryage was no more talked of then, for a great space: but as well the Commissioners, as such as stood by, began to make such outcryes, & laughed, and vsed such gesture as was vnseemely for þe place, and for such a matter. MarginaliaBlessed be you when they shall speake all reuiling wordes against you for my names sake.The Bishop of Chichester, Doctor Day called M. Hooper hypocrite, with vehement words, and scornful countenance. Bekonsall called hym beast: so did Smyth one of the Clerkes of the Counsayle, and diuers other that stood by. At length the Bishop of Winchester saide, that all men might liue chaste that woulde, and brought in this text: Castrauerunt se propter regnum cœlorum. i. There be that haue gelded thē selues for the kingdome of heauen. Math. 19.

[Back to Top]

M. Hooper said, that text proued not that al men could lyue chaste, but such onely to whom it was geuen: MarginaliaPriestes mariage not forbid by the olde Canōs.and read that which goeth before in the text. But there was a clamor and cry, mockyng & scornyng, with callyng hym beast, that the text coulde not be examined. Then M. Hooper said, that it dyd appeare by the olde Canons, that marriage was not forbydden vnto priestes, and named the Decrees. But the bishop of Winchester sent for an other part, namely the Clementines, or the Extrauagantes. But M. Hooper sayd, that booke was not it which he named.

[Back to Top]

Then cryed out the Bishop of Winchester, and sayde: You shall not haue any other, vntyll ye be iudged by this. And then began suche a noyse, tumult, and speakyng together of a great many that fauoured not the cause, that nothyng was done ne spoken orderly, nor charitably. Afterwardes Iudge MorganMarginaliaThis Morgan shortly after fel into a phrensy, and madnes and dyed of the same.beganne to rayle at M. Hooper a long tyme, with many opprobrious and fowle words of his doyng at Glocester in punishing of men, and said, ther was neuer such a tyrant as he was. After that, D. Day bishop of Chichester said, that the Coūcel of Ancyra, which was before the Councel of Nice, was against the marriage of Priestes.

[Back to Top]

Then cryed out my Lord Chauncelor, and many with hym, that M. Hooper had neuer read the Councels.

Yes my Lord (quoth master Hooper) and my Lord of Chichester Doctor Day knoweth that the great Councel of MarginaliaThe councel of Nice permitteth priests mariage.Nice, by meanes of one Paphnutius, decreed that no Minister shoulde be separated from his wyfe. But such clamours and cryes were vsed, that the Councell of Nice was not seene.

[Back to Top]
After