Thematic Divisions in Book 11
1. The Martyrdom of Rogers 2. The Martyrdom of Saunders 3. Saunders' Letters 4. Hooper's Martyrdom 5. Hooper's Letters 6. Rowland Taylor's Martyrdom 7. Becket's Image and other events 8. Miles Coverdale and the Denmark Letters 9. Bonner and Reconciliation 10. Judge Hales 11. The Martyrdom of Thomas Tomkins 12. The Martyrdom of William Hunter 13. The Martyrdom of Higbed and Causton 14. The Martyrdom of Pigot, Knight and Laurence 15. Robert Farrar's Martyrdom 16. The Martyrdom of Rawlins/Rowland White17. The Restoration of Abbey Lands and other events in Spring 155518. The Providential Death of the Parson of Arundel 19. The Martyrdom of John Awcocke 20. The Martyrdom of George Marsh 21. The Letters of George Marsh 22. The Martyrdom of William Flower 23. The Martyrdom of Cardmaker and Warne 24. Letters of Warne and Cardmaker 25. The Martyrdom of Ardley and Simpson 26. John Tooly 27. The Examination of Robert Bromley [nb This is part of the Tooly affair]28. The Martyrdom of Thomas Haukes 29. Letters of Haukes 30. The Martyrdom of Thomas Watts 31. Censorship Proclamation 32. Our Lady' Psalter 33. Martyrdom of Osmund, Bamford, Osborne and Chamberlain34. The Martyrdom of John Bradford 35. Bradford's Letters 36. William Minge 37. James Trevisam 38. The Martyrdom of John Bland 39. The Martyrdom of Frankesh, Middleton and Sheterden 40. Sheterden's Letters 41. Examinations of Hall, Wade and Polley 42. Martyrdom of Christopher Wade 43. Nicholas Hall44. Margery Polley45. Martyrdom of Carver and Launder 46. Martyrdom of Thomas Iveson 47. John Aleworth 48. Martyrdom of James Abbes 49. Martyrdom of Denley, Newman and Pacingham 50. Richard Hooke 51. Martyrdom of William Coker, et al 52. Martyrdom of George Tankerfield, et al 53. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Smith 54. Martyrdom of Harwood and Fust 55. Martyrdom of William Haile 56. George King, Thomas Leyes and John Wade 57. William Andrew 58. Martyrdom of Robert Samuel 59. Samuel's Letters 60. William Allen 61. Martyrdom of Roger Coo 62. Martyrdom of Thomas Cobb 63. Martyrdom of Catmer, Streater, Burwood, Brodbridge, Tutty 64. Martyrdom of Hayward and Goreway 65. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Glover 66. Cornelius Bungey 67. John and William Glover 68. Martyrdom of Wolsey and Pigot 69. Life and Character of Nicholas Ridley 70. Ridley's Letters 71. Life of Hugh Latimer 72. Latimer's Letters 73. Ridley and Latimer Re-examined and Executed74. More Letters of Ridley 75. Life and Death of Stephen Gardiner 76. Martyrdom of Webb, Roper and Park 77. William Wiseman 78. James Gore 79. Examinations and Martyrdom of John Philpot 80. Philpot's Letters 81. Martyrdom of Thomas Whittle, Barlett Green, et al 82. Letters of Thomas Wittle 83. Life of Bartlett Green 84. Letters of Bartlett Green 85. Thomas Browne 86. John Tudson 87. John Went 88. Isobel Foster 89. Joan Lashford 90. Five Canterbury Martyrs 91. Life and Martyrdom of Cranmer 92. Letters of Cranmer 93. Martyrdom of Agnes Potten and Joan Trunchfield 94. Persecution in Salisbury Maundrell, Coberly and Spicer 95. William Tyms, et al 96. Letters of Tyms 97. The Norfolk Supplication 98. Martyrdom of John Harpole and Joan Beach 99. John Hullier 100. Hullier's Letters 101. Christopher Lister and five other martyrs 102. Hugh Lauerocke and John Apprice 103. Katherine Hut, Elizabeth Thacknell, et al 104. Thomas Drury and Thomas Croker 105. Thomas Spicer, John Deny and Edmund Poole 106. Persecution of Winson and Mendlesam 107. Gregory Crow 108. William Slech 109. Avington Read, et al 110. Wood and Miles 111. Adherall and Clement 112. A Merchant's Servant Executed at Leicester 113. Thirteen Burnt at Stratford-le-Bow114. Persecution in Lichfield 115. Hunt, Norrice, Parret 116. Martyrdom of Bernard, Lawson and Foster 117. Examinations of John Fortune118. John Careless 119. Letters of John Careless 120. Martyrdom of Julius Palmer 121. Agnes Wardall 122. Peter Moone and his wife 123. Guernsey Martyrdoms 124. Dungate, Foreman and Tree 125. Martyrdom of Thomas More126. Martyrdom of John Newman127. Examination of John Jackson128. Examination of John Newman 129. Martyrdom of Joan Waste 130. Martyrdom of Edward Sharpe 131. Four Burnt at Mayfield at Sussex 132. John Horne and a woman 133. William Dangerfield 134. Northampton Shoemaker 135. Prisoners Starved at Canterbury 136. More Persecution at Lichfield
Critical Apparatus for this Page
Commentary on the Text
Names and Places on this Page
Unavailable for this Edition
1533 [1507]

Q. Mary. The story and examinations of Thomas Haukes, Martyr.

Marginalia1555. Maye.which if it were not so, Paule would neuer haue sayd it.

MarginaliaAnswere of Haukes to the first article.Haukes. What your Church doth, I can not tell: but I am sure that the holy Catholicke Church doth neither so take it, nor beleue it.

Boner. Whether doth the Catholicke Church teach and beleue the Baptisme that now is vsed in the Church, or no?

MarginaliaAnswere to the 2. article.Haukes. I answered to it as I did to þe other question before. Then did the Byshop with much flattery counsell me to be perswaded, and to keepe mee out of prison, which I vtterly refused, and so we departed. And I supposed that the next day I should haue gone to prison, and so I had, saue for the Archdeacon of Canterbury, whose name is Harpsfield, whom the Byshop had desired to talke with me, MarginaliaTalke betwene Haukes and D. Harpsfield Archdeacon of Cant.and began to perswade me concernyng the Sacrament, and the ceremonies: and after much talke he sayd that the Sacramēt of the aultar was the same body that was borne of the virgine Mary, which did hang vpon the Crosse.

[Back to Top]

MarginaliaA question put to Harpsfield.Haukes. He was vpon the crosse both aliue & dead: which of them was the Sacrament?

Harps. The Archdeacon aunswered, aliue.

Haukes. How proue you that?

Harps. Ye must beleue. Doth not S. Iohn say: He is already condemned, that beleueth not?  

Commentary   *   Close

Haukes is misquoting 1 John 5: 12.

Haukes. S. Iohn sayth: He that beleueth not in the sonne of God, is already condemned: but he sayth not, hee that beleueth not in the Sacrament, is already condemned.

Harps. There is no talke with you: for ye are both without fayth and learning, and therfore I will talke no more with you in Scripture.

Then two that stoode by, bad me enter further in talke with him, and then sayd I vnto him: MarginaliaAn other question put to Harpsfield why the Roodeloft is set betwene the Church and the Chauncell.why is the Roodeloft  

Commentary   *   Close

A beam supporting a cross placed in a church between the choir and the nave.

set betwixt the body of the Church,and the Chauncell?

Harps. I can not tell: for ye haue asked a question, which ye can not assoyle  

Commentary   *   Close

In this case, the word 'assoil' means to resolve or answer.

your selfe.

Haukes. Yes that I can: for this sayth one of your owne Doctours, that the body of the Churche doth represent the Churche militant, and the Chauncell the Churche triumphant: and so because we can not go from the Church militant to the Church triumphant, but that we must beare the crosse of Christ, this is the cause of the Roodeloft beyng betwene the body of the Church and the Chauncell.

[Back to Top]

Harps. This is well and clarkely concluded.

Haukes. As all the rest of your doctrine is: and so with many perswasions on hys part we ended, and so departed: and I to the Porters lodge agayne.

¶ An other dayes talke.

THe next day in the mornyng, whiche was the first day of Iuly, the Byshop did cal me him selfe from the Porters lodge, commaunding me to make me ready to go to prison, and to take such thynges with me, as I had of myne owne. And I sayd, I do neither intend to bribe, neither to steale, God wylling. MarginaliaHaukes sent to the Gatehouse at Westminster with the Bishops warrant.Then he did write my warrant to the Keeper of the Gatehouse at Westminster, and deliuered it to Harpsfield, who with his owne man and one of the bishops men brought me to prison, and deliuered the warāt and me both to the Keeper: and this was cōtained in the warrant.

[Back to Top]

MarginaliaThe Byshops warrant.I wyll and commaunde you, that you receaue him who commeth named in this warrant, and that he be kept as a safe prisoner, and that no man speake with him, and that ye deliuer him to no man, except it bee to the Councell, or to a Iustice: For he is a Sacramentarie, and one that speaketh agaynst Baptisme, a seditious man, a perilous man to be abroad in these perilous dayes.

[Back to Top]

And thus was I receiued, & they departed. And there I remained. xiij. dayes, and then MarginaliaThe Bishops men sent to Haukes in the Gatehouse.the Byshop sent two of his mē vnto me, saying: My Lord would be glad to know how ye do. I aunswered them, I do like a poore prisoner. They sayd: My Lord would know whether ye be the same man that ye were when ye departed? I sayd, I am no chaungelyng. They sayd, my Lord would be glad that ye should do well. I sayd: If my Lorde will me any good, I pray you desire him to suffer my frendes to come to me. So they sayd they would speake for me, but I heard no more of them.

[Back to Top]

This is the first examination of me Thomas Haukes, beyng examined by Edmund Boner, then Byshop of London, and by his Chaplaines and Doctours at Fulham. iiij. myles from London, where I lay till I came to prison to Westminster: and after his two men had bene with me, I heard no more of him, till the thyrd day of September.  

Commentary   *   Close

In the Rerum (p. 460) the date is given as 30 September, while it is given as 3 September in all editions of the Acts and Monuments. For once the date in the Rerum is correct; it is confirmed by the manuscript versions of Haukes's examinations (BL, Lansdowne 389, fos. 75r and 180v). The date of 3 September was probably a printer's error in the 1563 edition which was repeated in subsequent editions.

[Back to Top]

[Back to Top]
¶ Here foloweth the second tyme of myne examination, the which was the. 3. day of September:  
Commentary   *   Close

In the Rerum (p. 460) the date is given as 30 September, while it is given as 3 September in all editions of the Acts and Monuments. For once the date in the Rerum is correct; it is confirmed by the manuscript versions of Haukes's examinations (BL, Lansdowne 389, fos. 75r and 180v). The date of 3 September was probably a printer's error in the 1563 edition which was repeated in subsequent editions.

[Back to Top]
for the Byshop did send his men for me, to come to his pallace to London, and so my Keeper and his men brought me to his place the same day.

MarginaliaThe second tyme of Haukes his examination.THe Byshop of Winchester, then beyng Chauncellour, preached that day at Paules crosse, and the Byshop of London sayd to my Keeper, I thinke your man will not go to the Sermon to day.

Haukes. Yes my Lord, I pray you let me go: and that, that is good, I will receiue, and the rest I wil leaue behynd me, and so I went. And when the Sermon was done, I and my keeper came to the Bishops house, & there we remained til dynner was done: and after dyner the Byshop called for me, & asked me if I were the same man that I was before.

[Back to Top]

Haukes. I am no chaunglyng, neyther none will be.

Boner. Ye shall finde no chaunglyng neither. And so he returned into his chamber, and there he did write the side of a sheete of paper, and all that while I stode in the great chamber, and as many with me as might well stand in the chamber. And as I stode, MarginaliaD. Smith commeth to Haukes.MarginaliaD. Smithes recantation.Doctour Smith came vnto me (who once recanted, as it appeareth in Print) saying that hee would bee glad to talke brotherly with me. I asked him what he was. Then sayd they þt stode by, he is D. Smith. Then sayd I: are you he that did recant? And he sayd, it was no recantation, but a declaration.

[Back to Top]

Haukes. Ye were best to terme it well, for your own honesty.

D. Smith. Shall I terme it as it pleaseth you?

MarginaliaMyles Huggardes wordes to Tho. Haukes. MarginaliaMyles HuggardHaukes. To bee short with you, I will know whether ye will recant any more or no, before that I talke with you, credite you or beleue you: and so I departed frō him to þe other side of the chamber. Then sayd the Byshops men and his Chaplaynes, that my Lord commaunded me to talke with him. Thē they that stode by, cryed with a great noyse: hang him, burne him: it is pitie that he liueth, þt disobeyeth my Lordes commaundement.

[Back to Top]

Then sayd one Myles Huggard: where proue you that infantes were baptised?

Haukes. Go teach all Nations, baptising them in the name of the father, and of the sonne, and of the holy Ghost. Syr here is none excepted.

M. Hug. What? shall we go teach children?

Haukes. That word doth trouble you: it might be left out full well: it is to much for you to teach. Is not your name Myles Huggard?

M. Hug. So am I called.

Haukes. Be you not a Hosier, and dwel in Puddyng lane?  

Commentary   *   Close

It was very unusual for a lay person, much less an artisan, to be involved in the interrogation of a heretic. This is a significant indication of Hogarde's status as a polemicist and propagandist.

M. Hug. Yes that I am and there I do dwell.

Haukes. It would seeme so: MarginaliaHuggard more meete to eate a pudding, then to dispute of scripture.for ye can better skill to eate a puddyng and make a hose, then in Scripture either to aunswere, or to oppose.  

Commentary   *   Close

Haukes is probably quoting a derisory rhyme which the protestants were circulating about Hogarde.

With that he was in great rage, and did chafe vp and downe. Then I desired that some man would take the payne to walke the Gentleman, he did freat so for anger. Then one that stode by me, (who is person of Hornchurche and Rumford in Essex) sayd: alas what doe you meane? a young man to bee so stubburne? there seemeth to much pride in you.

[Back to Top]

Haukes. Are not ye the parson of Hornchurch?

Parson. Yes that I am.

Haukes. Did ye not set such a Priest in your benefice?

Parson. Yes for a shift.  

Commentary   *   Close

I.e., as a necessity.

Haukes. Like will to like: such maister, such man. For I know þt Priest to be a very vile man, as any could be. MarginaliaParson of Hornchurch compared to the wether cocke of Paules.I asked the Parson what kinne he was to the weather Cocke of Paules? and he fell in a great laughter, with the rest of his companions. He sayd that I did rayle.

[Back to Top]

Then sayd an other that stode by vnto mee: what booke haue you here? I aunswered, the new Testament. May I looke in it, sayd he? Yea that ye may sayd I. And so he looked in my booke, and sayd it was corrupt. I aūswered him: if the thynges contained in it be true, then are ye all false Prophetes. He sayd that he would appose me in the first word of the Testamēt, saying: MarginaliaFriuolous questions.here is a generation of Christ. And Esay sayth, no man can tell his generation.MarginaliaEsay. 53.

[Back to Top]

Haukes. What meaneth Esay by that?

I woulde learne of you (sayd he.)

Haukes. Yee would be angry if the scholler should learne the maister: but if ye will haue me to teach you, I will tell you Esayas meanyng.

Then sayd hee, no man can tell the generation betwene the father and the sonne: but you (I dare say) did know it before.

Haukes. Why then Esay denieth not the generation.

Then sayd he, why is Christ called Christ?

Haukes. Because he is a Messias.

Then sayd he, why is he called a Messias?

Haukes. Because he was so Prophecied by the Prophetes.

Then sayd he: why is your booke called a booke?

Haukes. These woordes doe breed more strife, then godly edifying.

Beware sayd he, that ye do not decline frō the Church: for if ye do, you will proue your selfe an hereticke.

Haukes. Euen as ye do call vs heretickes, that do encline

to