Thematic Divisions in Book 11
1. The Martyrdom of Rogers 2. The Martyrdom of Saunders 3. Saunders' Letters 4. Hooper's Martyrdom 5. Hooper's Letters 6. Rowland Taylor's Martyrdom 7. Becket's Image and other events 8. Miles Coverdale and the Denmark Letters 9. Bonner and Reconciliation 10. Judge Hales 11. The Martyrdom of Thomas Tomkins 12. The Martyrdom of William Hunter 13. The Martyrdom of Higbed and Causton 14. The Martyrdom of Pigot, Knight and Laurence 15. Robert Farrar's Martyrdom 16. The Martyrdom of Rawlins/Rowland White17. The Restoration of Abbey Lands and other events in Spring 155518. The Providential Death of the Parson of Arundel 19. The Martyrdom of John Awcocke 20. The Martyrdom of George Marsh 21. The Letters of George Marsh 22. The Martyrdom of William Flower 23. The Martyrdom of Cardmaker and Warne 24. Letters of Warne and Cardmaker 25. The Martyrdom of Ardley and Simpson 26. John Tooly 27. The Examination of Robert Bromley [nb This is part of the Tooly affair]28. The Martyrdom of Thomas Haukes 29. Letters of Haukes 30. The Martyrdom of Thomas Watts 31. Censorship Proclamation 32. Our Lady' Psalter 33. Martyrdom of Osmund, Bamford, Osborne and Chamberlain34. The Martyrdom of John Bradford 35. Bradford's Letters 36. William Minge 37. James Trevisam 38. The Martyrdom of John Bland 39. The Martyrdom of Frankesh, Middleton and Sheterden 40. Sheterden's Letters 41. Examinations of Hall, Wade and Polley 42. Martyrdom of Christopher Wade 43. Nicholas Hall44. Margery Polley45. Martyrdom of Carver and Launder 46. Martyrdom of Thomas Iveson 47. John Aleworth 48. Martyrdom of James Abbes 49. Martyrdom of Denley, Newman and Pacingham 50. Richard Hooke 51. Martyrdom of William Coker, et al 52. Martyrdom of George Tankerfield, et al 53. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Smith 54. Martyrdom of Harwood and Fust 55. Martyrdom of William Haile 56. George King, Thomas Leyes and John Wade 57. William Andrew 58. Martyrdom of Robert Samuel 59. Samuel's Letters 60. William Allen 61. Martyrdom of Roger Coo 62. Martyrdom of Thomas Cobb 63. Martyrdom of Catmer, Streater, Burwood, Brodbridge, Tutty 64. Martyrdom of Hayward and Goreway 65. Martyrdom and Letters of Robert Glover 66. Cornelius Bungey 67. John and William Glover 68. Martyrdom of Wolsey and Pigot 69. Life and Character of Nicholas Ridley 70. Ridley's Letters 71. Life of Hugh Latimer 72. Latimer's Letters 73. Ridley and Latimer Re-examined and Executed74. More Letters of Ridley 75. Life and Death of Stephen Gardiner 76. Martyrdom of Webb, Roper and Park 77. William Wiseman 78. James Gore 79. Examinations and Martyrdom of John Philpot 80. Philpot's Letters 81. Martyrdom of Thomas Whittle, Barlett Green, et al 82. Letters of Thomas Wittle 83. Life of Bartlett Green 84. Letters of Bartlett Green 85. Thomas Browne 86. John Tudson 87. John Went 88. Isobel Foster 89. Joan Lashford 90. Five Canterbury Martyrs 91. Life and Martyrdom of Cranmer 92. Letters of Cranmer 93. Martyrdom of Agnes Potten and Joan Trunchfield 94. Persecution in Salisbury Maundrell, Coberly and Spicer 95. William Tyms, et al 96. Letters of Tyms 97. The Norfolk Supplication 98. Martyrdom of John Harpole and Joan Beach 99. John Hullier 100. Hullier's Letters 101. Christopher Lister and five other martyrs 102. Hugh Lauerocke and John Apprice 103. Katherine Hut, Elizabeth Thacknell, et al 104. Thomas Drury and Thomas Croker 105. Thomas Spicer, John Deny and Edmund Poole 106. Persecution of Winson and Mendlesam 107. Gregory Crow 108. William Slech 109. Avington Read, et al 110. Wood and Miles 111. Adherall and Clement 112. A Merchant's Servant Executed at Leicester 113. Thirteen Burnt at Stratford-le-Bow114. Persecution in Lichfield 115. Hunt, Norrice, Parret 116. Martyrdom of Bernard, Lawson and Foster 117. Examinations of John Fortune118. John Careless 119. Letters of John Careless 120. Martyrdom of Julius Palmer 121. Agnes Wardall 122. Peter Moone and his wife 123. Guernsey Martyrdoms 124. Dungate, Foreman and Tree 125. Martyrdom of Thomas More126. Martyrdom of John Newman127. Examination of John Jackson128. Examination of John Newman 129. Martyrdom of Joan Waste 130. Martyrdom of Edward Sharpe 131. Four Burnt at Mayfield at Sussex 132. John Horne and a woman 133. William Dangerfield 134. Northampton Shoemaker 135. Prisoners Starved at Canterbury 136. More Persecution at Lichfield
Critical Apparatus for this Page
Commentary on the Text
Names and Places on this Page
Unavailable for this Edition
1683 [1657]

Q. Mary, The last examinations of B. Ridley and M. Latimer, Martyrs.

MarginaliaAnno. 1555. October.dynges at Westminster,  

Commentary   *   Close

Ridley, as bishop of London, had taken down the altars in the churches and replaced them with communion tables.

to receiue: and yet when your table was constituted, you could neuer be content, in placyng þe same nowe East, now North, now one way, now an other, vntill it pleased God of his goodnes to place it cleane out of the Church.

Rid. Your Lordships vnreuerent termes do not eleuate the thing. Perhaps some mē came more deuoutlie from puddings thē other mē now do frō other things.

Linc. As for that, M. Ridley, you ought to be iudge of no man: but by this your reasonyng you cause vs to stretch and enlarge our instructions. Wee came not to reason, but to take your determinate aunsweres to our Articles: MarginaliaThe Articles red again to M. Ridley.and eftsoones  

Commentary   *   Close

Repeatedly.

he red the ffrste Article in maner aboue specified.

[Back to Top]

Now M. Ridley, what saie you to the first Article? if you haue brought your aunswere in writyng, wee will receiue it: but if you haue written any other matter, we will not receiue it.

Rid. Then M. Ridley tooke a sheete of paper out of his bosome, and began to read that which he had written: but the B.of Lincolne commaunded the Bedle to take it from hym. But he desired licence to read it, saying, that it was nothing but his aunswere, MarginaliaB. Ridley not suffered to read his owne aunswere.but the Bishop would in no wise suffer hym.

[Back to Top]

Rid. Why my Lord, will you require myne aunswer, and not suffer mee to publishe it?MarginaliaNote extreme dealing of these catholike men. I beseeche you my Lordes, let the audience beare witnes in this matter. Your Lordships may handle it at your pleasures: therfore let the audience be witnes to your doynges.

Linc. Well M. Ridley, wee will firste see what you haue written, and then if we shall thinke it good to bee red, you shall haue it published: but except you will deliuer it first, we will take none at all of you.

With that M. Ridley seyng no remedy, deliuered it to an Officer, which immediatly deliuered it to the Bishop of Lincolne, who after hee had secretly communicated it to the other two bishops, declared the sense, but would not reade it as it was written, saying, that it cōteined words of blasphemie: MarginaliaThe deputies durst not read out the writing of Bishop Ridley.therefore he would not fill the eares of the audience therwithall and so abuse their pacience: notwithstanding M. Ridley desired very instantly to haue it published, saiyng that except a line or two, there was nothing conteined but the aunciēt Doctors saiynges for the confirmation of his assertions.

[Back to Top]

After the said Bishops had secretly vewed þe whole, then the Bishop of Lincolne said: In the first part M. Ridley, is nothyng contained but youre protestation, that you would not haue these your aunsweres so to be taken, as though you seemed thereby to consent to the authoritie or iurisdiction of the Popes holines.

[Back to Top]

Rid. No my Lorde, I praie you reade it out that the audience may heare it: but the Bishoppe of Lincolne would in no wise, because (he said) there were conteined wordes of blasphemy.

MarginaliaTo the first Article.Then the Bishop of Lincolne recited the firste Article, and required M. Ridleys aunswere to it. Then M. Ridley said, that his aūswere was there in writing, and desired that it might be published: but the Bishop would not read the whole, but here and there a peece of it. So the Notaries tooke his aunswere, that he referred him to his aunswere in writyng exhibited now, and also before at the tyme of disputation, M. Doct. Weston beyng prolocutor.

[Back to Top]

MarginaliaTo the second Article.In likewise the Bishop of Lincolne recited the second article, and required an aunswere, and M. Ridley referred him to his aunswer in writing, exhibyted now, and also before at the tyme of disputatiō: and like aunsweres were taken to all the residue of the articles.

These aunsweres in maner rehearsed, taken, and penned of the Notaries, the Bishop of Glocester begā an exhortation to moue M. Ridley to turne.

MarginaliaThe wordes of exhortation of Brokes Bishop of Glocester to M. Ridley.Glo. If you would once empty your stomacke, captiuate your senses, subdue your reason, and together with vs consider what a feble ground of your religion you haue, I do not doubt but you might easely be perduced to acknowledge one Church with vs, to confesse one faith with vs, and to beleue one religion with vs. For what a weake and feble stay  

Commentary   *   Close

Support, buttress.

in religion is this I pray you? Latimer leaneth to Cranmer, Cranmer to Ridley, and Ridley to the singularitie of his owne wit: so that if you ouerthrewe the singularitie of Ridleyes witte, then must needes the Religion of Cranmer and Latimer fall also. You remember well M. Ridley, that the Prophet speaketh moste truely, saiyng: væ, væ wo, wo bee to them whiche are singular and wise in their owne conceytes.

[Back to Top]

But you will saie, here it is true that the Prophet saith: but how know you that I am wise in myne owne conceit? Yes M. Ridley, you refuse the determination of the catholike Churche: you muste needes be singular and wise in youre owne conceite, for you bryng scripture for the probation of your assertions, and wee also bring Scriptures: you vnderstande them in one sense, and wee in an other. Howe will you knowe the truth herein? If you stand to your own interpretation, then are you singular in your owne conceit: but if you say ye will folowe the mindes of the Doctors and auncient fathers, semblably you vnderstande them in one meanyng, and wee take them in an other: howe will ye knowe the trueth herein? MarginaliaB. Ridley vntruely charged with singularitie.If you stande to your owne iudgemēt, then are you singular in your owne conceit, then can not you auoide the and wo which the Prophet speaketh of.

[Back to Top]

Wherefore, if you haue no staie but the catholicke church in matters of controuersie, except you will rest vpon the singularitie and wisdom of your owne brain, if the Prophet most truely saieth, Væ, væ wo, wo bee to them that are wise in their owne conceite: then for gods loue M. Ridley stand not singular, be not you wise in your owne conciete, please not your selfe ouermuche. Howe were the Arrians, the Manicheis, the Futichians,  

Commentary   *   Close

These were all considered to be heretical sects. The Arians, who flourished in the fourth to the eighth centuries, denied that Christ was equal to God the Father. Manicheanism was a dualistic religion founded by Mani (c. 215 - 275); it flourished throughout the fourth century, especially in North Africa. Eutyches (c. 378 - 454) denied the humanity of Christ; his followers were absorbed by the Monophysites, who flourished in the Byzantine empire until the eighth century.

[Back to Top]
with other diuers Heretickes whiche haue bene in the church, how I pray you were they suppressed and conuinced? by reasonyng in disputations? No truely, the Arrians had mo places of Scriptures for the confirmation of their heresie, then the Catholickes for the defence of the truthe. Howe then were they conuinced? MarginaliaThe determination of the church is onely that, wherupon our catholicke men doe groūd their faith.onelye by the determination of the Churche. And in deede except we do constitute the church our foundation, stay, and Iudge we can haue no end of controuersies, no ende of disputations. For in that we all bryng scriptures and Doctors for the probation of our assersions, who should be iudge of this our controuersie? If we our selues, then be we singular & wise in our owne conceites, then can not we auoide the wo that the Prophet speaketh of.

[Back to Top]

It remaineth therefore that we submitte our selues to the determination and arbitrement  

Commentary   *   Close

Judgement.

of the Churche, with whom God promised to remaine to the worldes end, to whom he promised to send the holy ghost which should teache it the truth. Wherfore M. Ridley, if you will auoid the wo that the Prophet speaketh of, be not you wise in your iudgement: if you will not be wise and singular in your owne iudgement, captiuate your own vnderstandyng, subdue your reason, and submit youre selfe to the determination of the Church.

[Back to Top]

This is briefly the summe of the Oration of the byshop of Glocester, by the whiche he endeuored in many mo wordes, amplifiyng and enlarging the matter eloquently with sundry pointes of Rethorick, to moue affections, to perswade master Ridley to recant and forsake his religion.

To whom M. Ridley aunswered in few words, MarginaliaA briefe aunswere of B. Ridley to Bishop Brokes tale.that he said most truly with þe Prophet, wo be to him which is wise in his owne conceit, but that he acknowledged no such singularitie in him, ne knewe any cause why he should attribute so much to him self. And where as he said that Maister Cranmer leaned to hym, that was moste vntrue, in that he was but a yong scholer in comparison of Maister Cranmer. For at what time he was a yong scholer, then M. Cranmer a Doctor, so that hee confessed that M. Cranmer might haue bene his scholemaster these many yeres. It seemed that hee woulde haue spoken more, but the Bishop of Glocester interrupted hym, saiyng:

[Back to Top]

Glo. Why M. Ridley, it is your owne confession, for M. Latimer at the tyme of disputations, confessed hys learnyng to lye in M. Cranmers bookes, and Master Cranmer also said that it was your doyng.

Linc. Likewise the Bishop of Lincolne with manie words and gentle, holding his cap in hand, desired him to turne. But M. Ridley made an absolute aunswere, MarginaliaBishop Ridley could not for his conscience yeld to the Popes doctrine.that he was fully perswaded, the religion which he defended to be grounded vpon Gods word, and therfore without great offence towardes God, great perill and damage of his soule, hee coulde not forsake his master and Lord God, but desired the bishop to performe his graunt in that his Lordship sayed the day before, that he should haue licence to shewe the cause why he coulde not with a safe conscience admit the authoritye of the Pope: but the Bishop of Lincolne said, that where as then he had demaunded licence to speake three wordes,

[Back to Top]
he
MMMM.iij.