MarginaliaAnno. 1555. Nouember.hym, as ouertooke hym, not so much burdened him, as made him burdenous to the whole realme. He was of a proude stomake
Of a proud spirit.
Proud, arrogant, haughty (OED).
Pelides, Cedere nescius
Not translated.
not knowing how to yield
Nos, Agrippa, neque haec dicere nec gravem
Pelidae stomachum cedere nescii
[Horace’s genitivenesciiis changed to a nominative nescius to fit into Foxe's sentence grammatically. Also a Latin alphabet Greek first declension nominative endingPelidesis used in place of the original genitivePelidae]
Stephen Gardiner, De vera obedientia (London, 1535), STC 11584. This work argued that the English king, and not the pope, was the legitimate head of the English church. It was frequently cited by protestants as proof of Gardiner's opportunism and lack of principle.
Gardiner's answers to the articles the privy council charged against him in 1550 are printed in 1563, pp. 755-68; 1570, pp. 1524-32; 1576, pp. 1300-06 and 1583, pp. 1550-06.
See 1563, pp. 1384-86; 1570, pp. 1956-59; 1576, pp. 1683-86 and 1583, pp. .
Vpon his estimatiō & fame he stode to to much, more then was meete for a man of his coate & callyng, whose profession was to be crucified vnto the worlde: whiche thing made hym so stiffe
Stubborn, obstinate.
Foxe derived this colourful, if spurious, piece of gossip from John Ponet, A shorte treatise of politike power (Strasburg, 1556), STC 20178, sig. I4r. Notice thatFoxe does not say that this information is true, he merely repeats it by saying that he will not repeat it.
Unscrupulous butchers sometimes increased the apparent size of their wares by inflating the entrails.
And as touching Diuinitie, he was so variable, waueryng with tyme, that no constant censure can be geuen what to make of hym. If his doyngs, & writynges were accordyng to his conscience, no man can rightlye say whether he was a right protestant or Papist. If he wrote otherwise then he thought, for feare, or to beare wt time, then was he a double depe dissembler before God and man, to say & vnsay, to write & vnwrite, to sweare and forsweare so as he did.MarginaliaThe mutabilitie of Steuen Gardiner in religion. For firste in the beginnyng of Quene Annes time,
I.e., Anne Boleyn.
Foxe's account is confused here. Gardiner was sent on two missions to Clement VII, one in 1528 and one in 1529, as part of Henry VIII's efforts to secure a divorce from Catherine of Aragon. But Gardiner was not sent on an embassy to Charles V until 1540, years after Anne Boleyn was dead, and the purpose of this embassy had nothing to do with advancing the protestant cause.
[Back to Top]And thus long continued he firme & forward, so that who but Winchester duryng al the tyme and reigne of Qeeene Anne. After her decease that tyme by litle and litle caried hym awaye, till at length MarginaliaThe first turnyng of Winchester from the Gospell, and why?the emulation
Ambitious rivalry (OED).
See Glyn Redworth, In Defence of the Church Catholic: The Life of StephenGardiner (Oxford: 1990), pp. 83-84 on Gardiner's animosity towards Bonner at this point in their lives.
the Gospell, as both by hys Sermon before kyng Edward, and also by his subscribyng to certaine Articles may appeare: MarginaliaAn other halfe turne of Winchester from Popery to the Gospell.and this was an halfe turne of Stephen Gardiner from Popery againe to the Gospell, and (no doubt) he would haue further turned, had not the vnlucky decaye of the Duke of Somerset cleane tourned him away from true Diuinitie to plain Popery:MarginaliaWinchester turned to a full Papist. wherin he continued a cruell persecutour to his diyng daye.
[Back to Top]And thus much concernyng the trade & profession of Ste. Gardiners Popish diuinity. In which his popish trade, whether he folowed more true iudgement, or els tyme, or rather the spirite of ambition and vaine glory, it is doubtfull to say, MarginaliaWinchester neuer constant in him selfe, nor agreing with other Papistes.and so muche the more doubtful, because in his doynges and writinges a man may see hym not onely contrarye to hym selfe, but also in some points contrary to other Papistes. And furthermore, where he agreeth with them, hee semeth therein not so muche to folowe his owne sense, as the mind and meanyng of Pereseus:
I.e., the Spanish theologian Martin Perez de Ayala.
And therfore, as in the true knowledge of gods holy word and scripture he appeareth no body:
Note that a passage which appeared here in the 1563 edition, conceding that Gardiner was 'in tong and utterance somewhat perchaunce praiseworthy' was dropped in later editions. Because it is so grudging, this is an impressive testimony to Gardiner's eloquence.
What moued him to be so sturdy against M. Cheke, & Sir T. Smith for þe Greke pronunciation, other may thinke what they please: I speake but what I thinke, that he so did, for that he sawe it a thing rather newly begun, then truely impugned.
Sir Thomas Smith, lecturer in Greek, and John Cheke had, since themid-1530s, been teaching Greek with an 'ancient' pronunciation (i.e., the pronunciation putatively used in ancient Greece rather than the modern Greek pronunciation). This 'ancient' pronunciation was championed by many humanists, notably Erasmus, but Gardiner favoured the modern pronunciation which had been traditionally taught in universities. In his capacity as chancellor of Cambridge, Gardiner banned the 'ancient' pronunciation from being taught at the University. Cheke and Smith wrote Latin treatises attacking Gardiner's position and Gardiner defended his position in lengthy Latin letters. (See J. A. Muller, Stephen Gardiner and the Tudor Reaction [London: 1926], pp. 121-23.
[Back to Top]But whatsoeuer he was, seeyng he is now gone, I referre hym to his Iudge, to whō he shall stand or fall. As concernyng his death and maner thereof, I would they whiche were present thereat, woulde testifie to vs what they saw. This wee haue all to thinke, that his death happened so oportunely, þt Englād hath a mighty cause to geue thanks to the Lord therfore: not so much for the great hurt he had done in time past in peruertyng his Princes, in bringyng in the. vi. Articles, in murderyng Gods Saintes, in defasing Christes sincere Religion. &c. MarginaliaSte. Gardiner especially hunteth for the life of Lady Elizabeth.as also especiallye for that hee had thought to haue brought to passe in murdrying also our Noble Queene that now is. For what soeuer daunger it was of death þt she was in, it did (no doubt) procede frō that bloudy Bishop, who was the cause therof.
Foxe persistantly, and unfairly, claimed that Gardiner was largely responsible for the imprisonment of Elizabeth and that the bishop sought to have her killed. For a discussion of this see Thomas S. Freeman, 'Providence and Prescription: The Account of Elizabeth in Foxe's "Book of Martyrs"' in Susan Doran and Thomas S. Freeman (eds.), The Myth of Elizabeth, (Basingstoke, 2003), pp. 30-31.
[Back to Top]In classical mythology Daedalus was a brilliant inventor and engineer.
I.e., plot.
Of thinges vncertaine, I muste speake vncertainly, for lacke of fuller information, or els peraduenture they be in þe Realme that can say more thē here I haue expressed. For as Boner, Story, Thornton, Harpsfield, Dunning, with other, were occnpied in puttyng þe poore braunches of gods Saintes to death: so this Bishop for his part bent all his deuises & had spent al his pouder
Gunpowder.