First he set vpon the Seruians and Bulgarians, thinking to reuenge hys fathers death,MarginaliaMarcus Despota slayne of the Turke. where he gaue the ouerthrow to Marcus Despota,MarginaliaSeruia, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Phocides, Thracia, Attica, Thessalia, with other Christiã countryes cõquered of the Turkes. with all the nobilitie of the Seruians and Bulgarians, and put all those parties vnder his subiection vnto the fines and borders of the Illyrians. All Thracia moreouer he brought likewise vnder hys yoke, onely Constantinople and Pera, excepted. That done, he inuaded the residue of Grecia, preuailyng agaynst the countreyes of Thessalia, Macedonia, Phocides, and Attica, spoylyng and burnyng as he passed, without any resistance: and so returnyng with innumerable spoyle of the Christians, vnto Adrianople,MarginaliaConstantinople besieged 8. yeres by the Turkes. layd siege to Constantinople the space of viij. yeares, and had expugned the same, but that Paleologus beyng brought to extremitie, was driuen to craue aide of the Frēch men, and of Sigismund the Emperour. Who beyng accompanied with a sufficient power of Frenchmen & Germains, came down to Hungaria and toward Seruia agaynst the Turke.MarginaliaThe Christians ouerthrown of the Turkes. Baiazetes hearyng of their commyng, raysed hys siege from Constantinople, and with 60000. horsemē came to Nicopolis, where he encountring with them, ouerthrew all the Christian army, tooke Iohn the Captaine of the Frenche power prisoner:MarginaliaSigismund Emperour put to flight. Sigismundus, which before in the Councell of Constance, had burned Iohn Hus and Hierom of Prage, hardly escaped by flying.MarginaliaThe barbarous crueltie of the Turkes agaynst the Christians. Baiazetes after the victory got, caried awaye duke Iohn, with v. other in bands, into Prusia, where before his face he caused all the other christen prisoners to be cut in pieces.
[Back to Top]Afterward the sayd Iohn beyng raunsomed wyth 200000. crownes, was deliuered. Some authors referre this story to the tyme of Calepinus, as followeth hereafter to be seene.
Baiazetes the cruel tyrant after this victory wonne and tyranny shewed vpon the Christians, returned agayne to his siege of Constantinople, fully bendyng him selfe to conquere and subdue the same. Whiche thyng no doubt he had accomplished,MarginaliaTamarlanes a Parthian stirred vp of God to reuēge the cause of the Christians. but that the prouidence of God, had founde such a meanes that Tamerlanes king of Parthia, with an 100. thousand horsemē and swarmes of footemen, like a violent flood, ouerrunnyng Asia and pressyng vpon Siria & Sebastia,MarginaliaBaiazetes sonne taken & slaine. had taken Orthobules þe sonne of Baiazetes, prisoner, & afterward slue him,MarginaliaCrueltie iustly reuenged with crueltie. exercising the like crueltie vpon his prisoners, as Baiazetes had done before vpē the Christians: In so much that he spared neither sexe nor age of the Turkishe multitude: of whom he caused xij. thousand at one tyme, to be ouerryden and troden downe vnder his horses feete.MarginaliaBaiazetes raiseth his siege frõ Constantinople. By reason whereof Baiazetes the tyraunte was enforced to rayse his siege from Constantinople and to retourn his power into Asia: where he, nere the hill called Stella, pitched his tentes there to encounter with Tamerlanes.
[Back to Top]The fight betwene these ij. was long and great on both sides, whiche was in the yeare of our Lord. 1397
The battle of Nicopolis was 25 September 1396; Bayezid was defeatedby Timur on 28 July 1402.
Sebastian Munster, Cosmographiae universalis (Basel, 1559), p. 959.
MarginaliaThe great victories of Tamerlanes in Asia. Tamerlanes after this conquest, passed with hys army into Mesopotamia, to Egypt, and all Syria, where he victoriously subduyng the Cities & munitions of the Turkes, at length also conquered Damascus In his sieges his maner was, the first day to go all in white attire, the second day in red, the third day in blacke: signifying therby mercy the first day to them that yelded, the second day the sword, the third day fier and ashes. At last after great victories and spoyles gotten of the Turkes, he returned into his countrey agayne, and there dyed. an. 1402.
[Back to Top]Seb. Munsterus writyng of this Tamerlanes
The passages on the numbers in Timur's army, on his conquests, andon his sons losing what their father had conquered, are taken from Sebastian Munster,Cosmographiae universalis (Basel, 1559), pp. 959-60.
In the mean tyme Baiazetes in the second yeare of his captiuitie
Actually Bayezid died on 9 March 1403, less than seven months after his defeat.
These passages are taken from Casper Peucer, Chronicon Carionis(Wittenburg, 1580), pp. 645-6 and they make a confused situation even more confusing. Bayezid's sons were: Süleyman (Calepine), Isa (Jesus; pace Peucer and Foxe there was only one son with this name), Mehmed, Musa (Moses) and Mustapha. There was no son named Hälil (or Hali). There was no son named 'Musulman'; if this is meant to be Mehmed, then the account in Peucer and Foxe is inaccurate from beginning to end. After Timur's victory, the Ottoman terriories were divided. Süleyman, the eldest, ruled the European territories, Mehmed, the youngest, ruled what is now northeastern Turkey. Isa ruled western Turkey. Musa and Mustapha had been taken prisoner along with Bayezid. Musa eventually fell into the hands of his brother Mehmed. Mustapha presumably died in Timur's custody. In 1403, Mehmed defeated Isa, seized his lands and drove him into exile. Isa secured Byzantine aid and re-invaded his former territories in 1404. Mehmed defeated him again, and Isa fled and disappeared from history. Later that year Süleyman invaded Turkey and occupied Isa's lands, driving Mehmed back into northeastern Turkey. In 1409, Mehmed took revenge against Süleyman by releasing their brother Musa and sending him against Süleyman. Musa entered into a marriage alliance with the Voyvode of Wallachia and, with troops supplied by his father-in-law, invaded Süleyman's teritories. Süleyman withdrew his armies from Turkey to deal with the threat and Mehmed overran these territories.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaCalepinus the fift after Ottomãnus. CAlepinus, or Celebinus was the sonne of Baiazetes
The account of Süleyman (Calepine) is taken largely from Casper Peucer, Chronicon Carionis (Wittenburg, 1580), pp. 645-6 with some material from Cuspinian. Despite Foxe's hailing him as an Ottoman emperor, Süleyman, is not generally considered one as he never ruled over the entire empire.
The Partians were actually a nomadic people who created an empireextending from the Euphrates, which flourished from the second century BCE tothe the third century AD. Peucer and Foxe are using a classical term to describeTimur's armies.
Actually Süleyman (Calepine) and his brother Mehmed retreated fromthe battle and abandoned their father. Neither brother was captured.
Foxe is taking his account from Johannes Cuspinian, De Turcorumorigine (Antwerp, 1541), fos. 14v-16v. Actually there was no such battle; it is probably a confused version of Sigismund's defeat at Nicopolis. Cuspinian admitsthat he does not know whether this battle took place in Murad's reign. This is from Johannes Cuspinian, De Turcorum origine (Antwerp, 1541), fo. 16v .
[Back to Top]This is from Johannes Cuspinian, De Turcorum origine (Antwerp, 1541), fo. 16v.
Musa (see C 177/35) caught Süleyman by surprise and defeated him. Musa's troops caught up with Süleyman as he was fleeing and killed him. This was in 1411, not 1410.
MarginaliaOrchanes and Moses hys vncle. AFter the captiuitie
Foxe took this very garbled account of Orhan and Musa from CasperPeucer, Chronicon Carionis (Wittenburg, 1580), pp. 646-7.
These passages are taken from Casper Peucer, Chronicon Carionis(Wittenburg, 1580), pp. 645-6 and they make a confused situation even more confusing. Bayezid's sons were: Süleyman (Calepine), Isa (Jesus; pace Peucer and Foxe there was only one son with this name), Mehmed, Musa (Moses) and Mustapha. There was no son named Hälil (or Hali). There was no son named 'Musulman'; if this is meant to be Mehmed, then the account in Peucer and Foxe, is inaccurate from beginning to end. After Timur's victory, the Ottoman terriories were divided. Süleyman, the eldest, ruled the European territories, Mehmed, the youngest, ruled what is now northeastern Turkey. Isa ruled western Turkey. Musa and Mustapha had been taken prisoner along with Bayezid. Musa eventually fell into the hands of his brother Mehmed. Mustapha presumably died in Timur's custody. In 1403, Mehmed defeated Isa, seized his lands and drove him into exile. Isa secured Byzantine aid and re-invaded his former territories in 1404. Mehmed defeated him again, and Isa fled and disappeared from history. Later that year Süleyman invaded Turkey and occupied Isa's lands, driving Mehmed back into northeastern Turkey. In 1409, Mehmed took revenge against Süleyman by releasing their brother Musa and sending him against Süleyman. Musa entered into a marriage alliance with the Voyvode of Wallachia and, with troops supplied by his father-in-law, invaded Süleyman's teritories. Süleyman withdrew his armies from Turkey to deal with the threat and Mehmed overran these territories.
[Back to Top]Orhan was the eldest son of Süleyman (Calepine), the eldest son of Bayezid. Musa (Moses) was Süleyman's brother, who defeated and killed him. After Süleyman's death, the Byzantine emperor, who had Orhan in custody, released him to make war on Musa. Musa retalitated by un-successfully besieging Constantinople in 1411. The same year he also defeated his brother Mehmed. In 1413, however, Mehmed defeated Musa and killed him. Mehmed then defeated Orhan, captured him and had him blinded.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaMahometes the vii. after Ottomannus. THis Mahumetes
This account of Mehmed I is taken from Casper Peucer, Chronicon Carionis (Frankfurt, 1594), p. 1205.
Mehmed was the youngest son of Bayezid, Süleyman (Calepine) was his elder brother.