Earle of Mansfield, with his wife and diuers other (whose names in these letters for hast, were not expressed) at that instant came into his chamber.MarginaliaThe quiet death of Luther. Finally, feelyng his fatall houre to approch, before ix. of the clocke in the mornyng, the. xviij. of February, he commēded himselfe to God, with this deuout prayer.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaThe prayer of Luther at his death MY heauenly father, eternall and mercyful God, thou hast manifested vnto me thy deare sonne, our Lord Iesus Christ. I haue taught him, I haue knovven hym, I loue hym as my lyfe, my health, and my redemptiō: vvhom the vvicked haue persecuted, maligned, and vvith iniurie afflicted. Dravv my soule to thee. After this he sayd as ensueth, thryse.
[Back to Top]I commende my Spirite into thy handes, thou hast redemed me, O God of truth. GOD so loued the vvorld, that he gaue his onely sonne, that all those that beleue in him, should haue lyfe euerlastyng. Iohn. iij.
Hauyng repeated oftentymes his prayers, he was called to God, vnto whom so faythfully he commended his spirit: to enioy, no doubt, the blessed society of the Patriarches, Prophetes, and Apostles in the kyngdome of God the father, the sonne and the holy Ghost. Let vs now loue the memory of this man, and the doctrine that he hath taught. Let vs learne to be modest and meeke. Let vs cōsider the wretched calamities and marueilous chaunges that shall folow this mishap and dolefull chaunce. I beseech thee O sonne of God, crucified for vs, and resuscitate Emanuell, gouerne, conserue and defend thy Church. Hæc Melancthon.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaThe death of duke Fridericke. Fridericus Prince Electour dyed
Frederick the Wise's death is from Johannes Sleidan, A famouse cronicle of our time, called Sleidanes Commentaries, trans. John Daus (London, 1560), STC 19848, fo. 56r.
This account of the pontificate of Leo X is translated from John Bale's Catalogus, pp. 636-8 and 644-6.
MarginaliaDisceptation betwene the Senate of Strausburgh, & Cardinall Campeius, about marryed mynisters. Mention was made
The account of Cardinal Campeggio and of the disputes of Strasbourg is taken from Johannes Sleidan, A famouse cronicle of our time, called Sleidanes Commentaries, trans. John Daus (London, 1560), STC 19848, fo. 48r-v.
And where it is obiected, that they receaue Priestes and men of the Clergy, into the fredome and protection of their Citie, to this they aunswered, that they dyd nothyng herein, but which was correspondent to the aūcient vsage and maner of the Citie before: and moreouer þt it was the byshops owne request and desire, made vnto them so to do.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaThe aunswere of Campeius to the ambassadours. To this the Cardinall agayne aduising well the letters of the Byshop, & the whole order of the matter, which was sent vnto hym, declared that he right well vnderstode by the letters sent, that the ministers in dede (as the Ambassadours sayd) were called out from the fredome, and liberties of the Citie, and yet no order of law was broken therein:MarginaliaThe popes prelates be lawles, & can breake no order whatsoeuer they doe. for as much as the Byshop, (sayd he) had there no lesse power and authoritie, then if he were his owne Vicare delegate, & therfore he desired them, þt they would assist the Byshop in punishyng the foresayd Ministers. &c.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaThe Ambassadours reply agaynst the Cardinall. After much other talk and reasonyng on both partes, wherein the Ambassadours argued in defence of their fredome, that the iudgemēt should not be transferred out of the Citie, among other communication, they inferred moreouer and declared,MarginaliaHoly matrimony punished, wicked whoredome escapeth. how in the Citie of Strausburgh were many yea the most part of the Clergy, which lyued viciously and wickedly with their strumpets and harlots, whō they kept in their houses, to the great offence of the people, shame to Christes Church, and pernitious example of other: and yet the Byshop would neuer once styrre to see any punishyng or correctiō therof. Wherfore if the Senate (sayd the Ambassadours) should permit the Byshop to extende his crueltie and extremitie agaynst these maryed Ministers, for not obseruyng the Byshop of Romes law, and leaue the other notorious whoremasters, which brake the law of God, to escape vnpunished, doubtles it would redounde to their great daūger and perill, not onely before God, but also among the commons of their Citie, ready to rise vpon them.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaCampeius answereth. To this Campeius aunswered, what composition or bargayne was betwixt the Byshop and them, he knew not: but surely the Acte of the one was manifest, and neded no great triall in law of prouyng and confessyng, and therefore they were sequestred and abandoned from the communion of the Church, ipso facto.MarginaliaIpso facto, that is, vpon the very doing of the acte, without any further iudgement or tryall by the lawe. As for the other sort of thē, which keepe harlottes and concubines although (sayd he) it be not well done: yet doth it not excuse the enormitie of their Mariage. Neither was he ignoraunt, but that it was the maner of the Byshoppes of Germany, for money to wynke at Priestes lemans, and the same also was euill done in deede: and farther, that the tyme should come, when they shall be called to an accompt for the same: but yet neuerthelesse it is not sufferable that Priestes therefore should haue wyues. And if comparison should be made (sayd he) much greater offence it were, a Priest to haue a wife, then to haue & kepe at home many harlottes.MarginaliaA fitte reasō for a carnall Cardinall: better it is to haue many concubynes, then one wife. His reason was this: For they that keepe harlots (said he) as it is naught that they do, so do they acknowledge their sinne: the other perswade them selues to do wel, and so continue styl without repentance, or conscience of their facte. All men (sayd he) can not be chaste, as Iohn Baptist was: yet can it not be proued by any example, to be lawfull for Priestes professing chastitie, to leaue their single lyfe, and to mary:MarginaliaTouching the Greeke Church how vntruely this Cardinall speaketh, turne to the pag. 189. no not the Greekes them selues, which in rites be differyng from vs, do geue this libertie to their owne Priestes to marrye: wherefore he prayed them to geue their ayde to the Bishop in this behalfe.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaThe Ambassadours reply. Whereunto the Ambassadours replyed againe, saying, that if he would first punish the whoremasters, then might the Senate assist hym the better in correctyng the other. But the Cardinal was styl instaunt vpon them, that first they should assist their Bishop, & then if the Bishop would not punish whoredome, he woulde come thyther hym selfe, and see them punished accordingly.
[Back to Top]This Cardinal Campeius, how he was sent by Pope Clement the vi. to the second assemble or diet of Norenberge, ann. 1524. & what was there done by þe said Cardinal, is before signified,
The second diet of Nuremberg is not discussed in Foxe, he is merely carelessly repeating Sleidan's reference to his previous discussion of the diet.
This is the Colloquy of Regensburg (Ratisbon) in 1524. Foxe uses John Daus's translation of Sleidan's Commentaries. (See Johannes Sleidan, A famouse cronicle of our time, called Sleidanes Commentaries, trans. John Daus [London, 1560], STC 19848, fos. 49v-50r).