Piedmont, to inhabite in Prouince, in certaine Villages destroyed by warres and other desert places: Wherin they vsed such labour and diligence, that they had abundance of corne, wyne, oyles, hony, almons, wyth other fruites & commodities of the earth, & much cattell. Before they came thether, Merindol was a barrē desert and not inhabited. But these good people (in whõ God alwayes had reserued some litle seede of pietie)MarginaliaFor the originall of this people, see before in pag. [illegible text]. beyng dispersed, and separated from the societie of mē, were compelled to dwell with beastes, in that wast and wild desert, which notwithstandyng, through the blessyng of God, and their great labour and traueil, became excedyng frutefull. Notwithstandyng þe world in the meane tyme, so detested & abhorred thē, and with all shamefull rebukes & contumelies, rayled against them in such despitefull maner, that it seemed they were not worthy that the earth should beare thē. For they of a long continuance & custome, had refused the Byshop of Romes authoritie, and obserued euer a more perfect kynde of doctrine, then others, deliuered to them from the father to the sonne, euer since the yeare of our Lord. 1200.
[Back to Top]For this cause they were oftē accused & complayned of to the kyng, as contēners and despisers of the Magistrates & rebels. Wherfore they were called by diuers names accordyng to the countreys and places where they dwelt. For in the countrey about Lyõs, they were called the poore people of Lyons:MarginaliaPauperes de Lugduno, Waldenses, Turrelupini, Chagnardi.
Of Waldo, read before pag. 234. In the borders of Sarmatia
Crespin's account glosses these various names: 'Vaudois' from 'Pierre Waldo', their presumed founder; 'Lollard' in England, Poland ('Sarmatia') and Livonia; 'Turelupins' ['Turrelupius'] in Artois and Flanders, Chaignars or Chienars ('Chagnardes') in Dauphiné and Piedmont. Foxe's explanation of the latter 'because they liued in places open to the Sunne, and without house or harborough' is not in the Crespin narrative.
[Back to Top]For the Vaudois settlement in and around Mérindol (Vaucluse) in the diocese of Cavaillon, and Cabrières d'Avignon (Vaucluse) in the diocese of Carpentras, see G. Audisio, The Waldensian Dissent. Persecution and Survival, c.1170-c.1570 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 190-193.
For the despatch of Georges Morel ['Georgus Maurellus'], native of Chanteloube (Saint-Crépin) in Dauphiné, and Pierre Masson ['Petrus Latomus'], native of Burgundy in 1530 on this delicate mission to the leading theologians of the emerging Reformed protestant opinions to Johann Oecolampadius (Basel), Berthold Haller (Bern) and Martin Bucer (Strasbourg), see G. Audisio, The Waldensian Dissent. Persecution and Survival, c.1170-c.1570 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 157-8; E. Cameron, The Reformation of the Heretics: the Waldenses of the Alps, 1480-1580 (Oxford: O.U.P., 1984), pp. 134-138; 180-182. Morel was arrested (10 September 1530) during his return journey and died at Dijon. For the distinctive role of the Waldensian 'barbes', see G. Audisio, Preachers by Night. The Waldensian Barbes (15th-16th Centuries) (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2007).
[Back to Top]This passage, a direct translation from Crespin's 1556 text, has in the past been taken to mean that there was a Vaudois 'synod' in Mérindol. If there was a meeting of some of the Vaudois barbes it should not be taken to mean that it resulted in formal documents such as a 'confession' of their faith. The Vaudois community does not seem to have worked with that kind of organisation, structure, and written documentation. See E. Cameron, The Reformation of the Heretics: the Waldenses of the Alps, 1480-1580 (Oxford: O.U.P., 1984), pp. 137-8.
[Back to Top]Foxe follows here scrupulously the account given in Crespin [1560], fol 89A, ignoring later amplifications of the narrative undertaken by Crespin. For the history of Jean de Roma, including confirmation of much of Foxe's narrative, see G. Audisio, Le barbe et l'inquisiteur. Procès du barbe vaudois Pierre Griot par l'inquisiteur Jean de Roma (Apt, 1532) (Ax-en-Provence, 1979), introduction.
[Back to Top]Wherfore Fraūces the French kyng beyng informed of the straunge & outragious cruelty of this hellishe Monke: sent letters to the high Court or Parlament of Prouince, that forthwith he should be apprehended, & by forme of proces and order of law, he should be condemned, and aduertisemēt sent vnto him with all spede, of his cõdemnation. The Monke beyng aduertised hereof by his frendes, conueyed himselfe to Auinion, where he thought to enioy the spoylynges, which he, like a notorious theefe, had gottē by fraude & extortion, from the poore Christians. But shortly after, he which had so shamefully spoyled other, was spoyled of altogether, by his owne houshold seruaunts:MarginaliaThe iust iudgment of God agaynst a cruell persecutor. Wherupon, shortly after, he fell sicke of a most horrible disease, straunge and vnknowen to any Phisition. So extreme were the paynes & tormentes, wherewith he was cõtinually vexed in all his body, that no oyntment, no fomentation, nor any thyng els, could ease hym one minute of an houre. Neither was there any man that could tary neare about him: ne yet would any of hys owne frendes come neare hym: so great was the stinch that came frõ hym. For the which cause he was caryed from the Iacobines, to an hospitall, there to be kept: But the stinch & infection, so encreased, that no man durst there come neare him: no nor he himselfe was able to abyde the horrible stinch that ishued from his body, full of vlcers & sores and swarmyng with vermine, and so rotten, that the flesh fell away from the bones, by peecemeale.
[Back to Top]Whiles he was in these tormentes and anguish, he cryed out oftētymes in great rage: Oh who wil deliuer me? Who will kill & rydde me out of these vntolerable paynes, which I know, I suffer for the euils and oppressions, that I haue done to the poore men? And he hymselfe went about diuers times, to destroy himselfe, but he had not þe power.MarginaliaA spectacle to all persecutors. In these horrible tormentes and anguish, and fearefull dispayre, this blasphemer and most cruell homicide, most miserably ended his vnhappy dayes & cursed life, as a spectacle to all persecutours, receauyng a iust reward of his cruelty by the iust Iudgement of God. When he was dead, there was no man that would come neare him to bury him: but a yoūg Nouice newly come to his order, in stede of a more honorable sepulture, caught hold with a hooke vpon his stinkyng carian, and drew him into a hole hard by, which was made for him.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaThe Byshop of Aix, Perionet, hys Officiall, Meiranus, cruell persecutors. After the death of this cruell monster,
This passage was not included in the reprinted Crespin text, but was incorporated into Pantaleon's narrative from the original Crespin edition of 1554. It was the briefest of indications that the ecclesiastical prosecution of the Vaudois had been active through much of the 1530s. The archbishop of Aix-en-Provence in this period was Pierre Filhol ['Philholi'].
[Back to Top]MarginaliaAn other example of Gods terrible iudgemēt vpon a persecutor. After the death
The careers of the magistrates in the Parlement of Aix-en-Provence mentioned in this passage are evoked in F. Vindry, Les parlementaires français au XVIe siècle 2 vols (Paris: H. Champion, 1909-1912). For Barthélemi Chassané [var: Chasseneuz - Foxe refers to him as 'Barthellemewe Chassane' in the 1563 edition], nominated premier president there in 1531, see Fleury Vindry, 1, p. 20. For Thomas Cuisinier [var: Cuissinier; Cousinier], sieur de Beaujay, also premier president at the Parlement, Ibid., 1, p. 20. Nicolas de Mathieu, sieur du Revest et de Riez is probably the 'Lord of Revest' to whom the account refers.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaAn other example of Gods iudgement vpon Cassaneus, a bloudy persecutor. After him succeded Bartholomeus Chassaneus, likewise a pestilent persecutour, whom God at length strocke with a fearefull and sodein death. In the tyme of this tyrã, those of Merindol, in the person of ten, were cited personally to appeare before the kings Atturney. But they hearyng that the Court had determined to burne them without any further processe or order of law, durst not appeare at the day appoynted.MarginaliaA bloudy decree agaynst the Merindolians. For which cause
This notorious arrêt of the Parlement of Aix-en-Provence was pronounced on 18 November 1540. The text was included in extenso in the Recueil and in editions of Crespin from 1560 onwards (Crespin/Benoit, 1, pp. 383-4) condemning 19 Vaudois to be burned, their property confiscated and their village at Mérindol destroyed. The names of those mentioned in the arrêt are rendered by Foxe as best he could, and their orthography differs in the various sources (cf A.-L. Herminjard, Correspondance des réformateurs dans les pays de la langue française [Geneva, 1866-1867], 6, p. 228 and l'Histoire memorable). They included André Maynard, bailli of Mérindol, François Maynard, Martin Maynard, Iacques Maynard, Michel Maynard, Iean Pom and his wife, Facy le Tourneur and his wife, Martin Vian and his wife, Iean Pallenq and his wife, Peyron Roi, Philippon Maynard, Iaques de Sangre, Me Leon Barberoux, Claude Fauyer de Tourves, M. Pomery et Marthe Pomery, his wife, Thomas Pallenq, and Guillaume le Normand.
[Back to Top]This bloudy Arrest or Decree seemed so straunge and wonderfull, that in euery place thoroughout all Prouince, there was great reasonyng and disputation concernyng the same, especially among the Aduocates, and men of learnyng and vnderstandyng: in so much that many durst boldly & openly say, that they greatly marueiled, how that Court of Parlamēt could be so mad, or so bewitched, to giue out such an Arrest, so manifestly iniurious & vniust, and contrary to
[Back to Top]