(1512 - 1580) [www.fiu.edu/~mirandas/bios1545.htm#Portugal]
Son of King Manuel of Portugal; archbishop of Braga (1533 - 40); archbishop of Evora (1540 - 64, 1574 - 78); cardinal 1545; legate in Portugal 1553
Regent with Queen Catherine 1557; sole regent 1562; archbishop of Lisbon (1564 - 69); king of Portugal (1578 - 80)
William Gardiner was living in Lisbon at the time of the celebration of the marriage between João Manuel of Portugal and Joan of Spain. The cardinal officiated. 1563, p. 876; 1570, p. 1542; 1576, p. 1315; 1583, p. 1365.
At the time of the marriage of João Manuel of Portugal and Joan of Spain, Gardiner attended a mass and was distressed at the people's reaction to the sacrament. The next Sunday during mass, he grabbed the host out of the cardinal's hand and trod it under foot. 1563, pp. 876-77; 1570, pp. 1542-43; 1576, p. 1315; 1583, p. 1365.
[Back to Top]Companion of William Gardiner; Foxe's source for his martyrdom
Pendigrace was examined at the same time as Gardiner. He was imprisoned for two years. 1563, p. 877; 1570, p. 1543; 1576, p. 1315; 1583, p. 1365.
course of people resorted, some of good will, some for seruice sake, and some (as the maner is) to gaze and looke. Great preparation of all parties was there throughout the whole Citie, as in such cases is accustomed, and all places were filled with mirth and gladnes. In this great assembly of the whole kingdome, William Gardiner, who, albeit he did not greatly esteeme such kind of spectacles, yet being assured through the fame and report thereof, was there also, comming thether early in the morning, to the intent he might haue the more oportunitie and better place to behold and see.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaA Popishe celebration of a mariage.The houre being come, they flocked into the church with great solemnitie and pompe: the King first, and then euery estate in order. The greater persons, the more ceremonies were about them. After all things were set in order, they went forward to the celebrating of their Masse: for that alone serueth for all purposes. The Cardinall did execute, with much singing and orgaine playing.
These is a hint here that Foxe did not approve of organs and choral music during church services.
MarginaliaWilliam Gardiner cleareth his bookes of accomptes.In this deliberation and aduise his minde being fully setled, and thinking that the matter ought not to be any longer differred, he renounced the world, making vp all his accompts so exactly (as well of that whiche was due vnto him, as that whiche he ought vnto others) that no man coulde iustly aske so muche as one farthing. MarginaliaWilliam Gardiner continuing in watching and prayer.Which thyng done, he continued night and day in prayer calling vppon God, and continuall meditation of the Scriptures, that scarsely he would take any meate by day, or slepe by night, or that most, aboue an houre or two of rest in the night, as Pendigrace his felow companion both at bed and boord, being yet aliue, can testifie.
This acknowledgement that Pendigrace was Foxe's source first appears in Rerum, p. 206. For a possible identification of 'Pentigrace' as one Thomas Pendigrace, see Thomas S. Freeman and Marcello J. Borges, '"A grave and heinous incident against our holy Catholic Faith": Two Accounts of William Gardiner's Desecration of the Portuguese Roayl Chapel in 1552', Historical Research 69 (1966).
[Back to Top]MarginaliaWilliam Gardiners aduised preparation to the accomplishment of his purpose.The Sonday came again to be celebrate
The wedding which putatively inspired Gardiner's act of sacrilege took place on 4 December 1552 (not September as Foxe states); the act of sacrilege itself took place on 11 December.
Interestingly, a witness testified before the tribunal investigating Gardiner that, at the time of his act of sacrilege, he was 'a man of respectable appearance' ['um homem bem disposito'] (Thomas S. Freeman and Marcello J. Borges, '"A grave and heinous incident against our holy Catholic Faith": Two Accounts of William Gardiner's Desecration of the Portuguese Royal Chapel in 1552', Historical Research 69 [1996], p. 5).
[Back to Top]Foxe is in error on this point. The Cardinal-Infante Henrique was unquestionably present at the service, but testimony at Gardiner's trial reveals that a royal chaplain was celebrating Mass (Thomas S. Freeman and Marcello J. Borges, '"A grave and heinous incident against our holy Catholic faith": Two Accounts of William Gardiner's Desecration of the Portuguese Royal Chapel in 1552', Historical Research 69 [1996], p. 13).
[Back to Top]In a pastoral letter written after Gardiner's sacrilege, the Archbishop of Lisbon wrote that Gardiner had crushed the Host with one hand and overturned the chalice with the other (I. da Rosa Pereira, 'O Desacato na Capella Real em 1552 e o processo do calvinista inglês peranto Ordinário de Lisboa', Annais da Academia Portuguesa da Historia 29 (1984), pp. 618-19).
[Back to Top]Witnesses testified at Gardiner's trial that the crowd attacked Gardiner and were only stopped from killing him by the personal intervention of João III (Thomas S. Freeman and Marcello J. Borges, '"A grave and heinous incident against our holy Catholic Faith": Two Accounts of William Gardiner's Desecration of the Portuguese Royal Chapel in 1552', Historical Research 69 (1996), pp. 14-15).
[Back to Top]MarginaliaWilliam Gardiner brought before the king.After the tumult was ceased, he was brought vnto theKing: by whome he was demaunded what countryman he was, and how he durst be so bold to worke such a contumely against his Maiestie, and the Sacramentes of the Church? He answered:
To accept that this speech actually took place, one must accept that a person who seriously wounded by an enraged mob would have had the presence of mind to deliver this oration and that the king, anxious to forestall the mob, would have listened patiently while he delivered it. It is almost certain that Foxe wrote this little speech himself. His reason for doing so was clear. The martyrologist was anxious to clear Gardiner (and Protestants in general) of any taint of disrespect for monarchs or sedition.
[Back to Top]MarginaliaThe suspition of the Portugales vpon the facte of W. Gardiner.When they heard that he was an Englishman, and called to remembraunce how the Religion was restored by K. Edward, they were by and by brought in suspition, that he had bene suborned by Englishmen thus to do, to mocke and deride their religion. Wherefore they were the more earnest vpon him to knowe who was the author and procurer that he should commit that act. MarginaliaThe answer of William Gardiner to the false suspition of the Portugalls.Vnto whome he answered, desiring them that they would conceiue no suche suspition of him, for so much as he was not moued thereunto by any man, but only by his owne conscience. For otherwise there was no man vnder the heauen, for whose sake he would haue put himselfe into so manifest daunger: but that he ought this seruice first vnto God, and secondarily vnto their saluation: wherefore if he had done anye thing which were displeasaunt vnto them, they ought to impute it vnto no man, but vnto themselues, which so vnreuer?tly vsed the holy Supper of the Lord vnto so great Idolatry, not without great ignominie vnto the Church, violation of the Sacraments, and the perill of their owne soules, without they repented.
[Back to Top]Whilest that he spake these with many other thynges more vnto this effect very grauely and stoutly, the bloud ran aboundantly out of the wounde, so that he was ready to faint. Whereupon Surgeons were sent for, whereby he might be cured if it were possible, and be reserued for further examination, and more greeuous torment. For they were fully perswaded that this deede had diuers abbettors and setters on: which was the cause that all the other englishmen also in the same citie came into suspition, and were commaunded to safe custody. MarginaliaPendigrace bedfellow to W. Gardiner imprisoned vpon suspition.Amongst whome, Pendigrace, because he was his bedfellow, was greeuously tormented and examined more then the residue, and scarcely was deliuered after two yeares imprisonment. The other were much sooner set at libertie at the intercession of a certaine Duke.
It is worth noting that, despite Portuguese suspicions that Gardiner was not acting alone, the incident did not disturb either diplomatic or trade relations between England and Portugal.
Actually Portuguese; Foxe seems to have believed that the language of Portugal was Spanish.
Gardiner's examinations were conducted in Latin but recorded in Portuguese.
But they not being therewith satisfied, added another straunge kynde of torment, which (as I suppose) passeth the Bull of Phalaris.MarginaliaThe Bull of Phaleris a certaine tyranne was a kinde of torment made of Brasse lyke a Bull with fire vnder it to torment such as were put into it, and make them to roare like a Bull. Because there shoulde no kynde of extreme crueltie be left vnassayed,
The Portuguese records state that torture was applied to Gardiner, but they do not describe the tortures. The tortures described by Foxe have a grim plausibility since conventional tortures could not be used on a severely wounded man.
Thus as the last, when all tormentes and tormenters were weeried, and that it did nothing at all preuaile to go this way to worke, they asked him whether he did not repent his wicked and seditious deede. As touching the deede, aunswered, that it was so farre off that he did repent,MarginaliaWilliam Gardiner not repenting his fact. that if it were to do againe, he thought he should do the same. But as touching the maner of the deede, he was not a little sory that it was done in the Kings presence to the disquietnes of his minde. Howbeit, that was not to be imputed vnto him, which neither enterprised or thought vpon any such matter, but rather to be ascribed vnto the King, in that he hauing power, woulde not prohibite so great Idolatry vsed among his people. This he spake with great feruencie.
[Back to Top]After they had vsed all kynde of torments, and saw that there could nothing more be gathered of him, and also that through his woundes and paynes he could not long liue, they brought him three dayes after to execution. And first