Critical Apparatus for this Page
View an Image of this PageCommentary on the Text
 
Person and Place Index   *   Close
Charlemagne

(742x747 - 814)

King of the Franks (768 - 814); king of the Lombards (774 - 814); emperor of the Romans (800 - 814)

Pope Stephen III called on Charlemagne for help against the Lombards; Charlemagne defeated King Desiderius and took over the rule of the Lombard kingdom. 1570, p. 174; 1576, p. 131; 1583, p. 130.

After the death of Charlemagne's brother Carloman, Carloman's wife and children went to Pope Adrian I for protection. He turned them over, with Desiderius, to Charlemagne, who kept them in captivity in France. 1570, p. 175; 1576, p. 132; 1583, p. 131.

Charlemagne confirmed the donations to the papacy of his father and added more. He received from Pope Adrian I the title of patrician of the Romans. 1570, p. 174, 1576, p. 132, 1583, p. 131.

Charlemagne granted to the clergy and people the right to elect bishops and to monks the right to elect their abbots. He was said to have received from Adrian I the right to choose and ordain the bishop of Rome. 1570, p. 5, 1576, p. 4, 1583, pp. 4-5

Charlemagne provided laws, rites and ordinances for the clergy and laity and called church synods. 1570, p. 9, 1576, pp. 7-8, 1583, pp. 7-8

Alcuin was sent to Charlemagne by Offa of Mercia in hopes of cementing peace between them. Charlemagne held Alcuin in high esteem and made him abbot of Tours. 1570, p. 173; 1576, p. 131; 1583, p. 129

Charlemagne sent a letter to King Offa, praising Pope Adrian I. 1570, p. 175; 1576, p. 132; 1583, p. 131

Pope Adrian favoured the mass of St Gregory over that of St Ambrose. He called a council that ordained that Gregory's mass should be used universally, and Charlemagne executed the decree. 1570, p. 174, 1576, p. 131, 1583, p. 130.

Charlemagne presided over the Council of Frankfurt, which rejected decrees of the Council of Nicea advocating the adoration of images. 1563, p. 4; 1570, p. 175; 1576, p. 132; 1583, p. 131

Charlemagne was crowned emperor of the Romans by Pope Leo III. 1570, p. 175, 1576, p. 132, 1583, p. 131.

Eadburh, daughter of Offa and wife of Beorhtric, poisoned her husband, along with some nobles. She fled into France, where both Charlemagne and his son offered to marry her. When she chose the son, she was sent to a nunnery. She had an affair with a monk and was expelled. 1570, p. 176, 1576, p. 133, 1583, p. 132.

[Back to Top]

Charlemagne built many monasteries, was generous to churchmen and to the poor, a triumphant warrior and skilled in languages. 1570, p. 175; 1576, p. 132; 1583, p. 131

 
Person and Place Index   *   Close
Christianus Druthmarus

C9 monk of Corbie; wrote commentaries on the Gospels

Druthmarus lived and wrote in the time of Charlemagne. 1570, p. 1564; 1576, p. 1334; 1583, p. 1394.

 
Person and Place Index   *   Close
Joannes Scotus Eriugena

Of Antioch

C9 Irish teacher, theologian, philosopher, poet [Catholic Encyclopedia]

Joannes Scotus was well thought of by Charles the Bald and Louis the Stammerer. 1570, p. 1300; 1576, p. 1113; 1583, p. 1138.

 
Person and Place Index   *   Close
Ratramnus of Corbie [Bertram]

C9 theologian [Diarmaid MacCulloch, Thomas Cranmer: A Life (New Haven, 1996) pp. 181, 355, 382-83, 391]

Ratramnus lived about 810 under Charlemagne. 1570, p. 1300; 1576, p. 1112; 1583, p. 1138.

Ratramnus was a learned man and wrote on the eucharist. 1570, p. 1564; 1576, p. 1334; 1583, p. 1394.

1418 [1394]

King Edw. 6. The iudgementes of the fathers vpon these wordes, hoc ect corpus meum.

MarginaliaAnno 1552.nobis sit donandum figuratè significatur: in hoc autem sacrificio, quid nobis donatum sit, euidenter ostenditur. In illis sacrificijs prænunciabatur filius Dei occidendus: in hoc pro impijs annunciatur occisus. In those carnall oblations the flesh of Christ was figured, which he should offer for our sinnes, and the bloud which he should bestow for vs. But in this sacrifice is the giuing of thanks and memorial of the flesh of Christ, which he hath offred for vs, and of the bloud which he hath shedde for vs. In that sacrifice therfore is signified figuratiuely what should be giuē for vs: in this sacrifice what is giuen to vs, is euidently declared. In those sacrifices, the sonne of God was before preached to be slaine: in thys sacrifice he is shewed to be slaine already for the wicked. MarginaliaOrigines in Matth.Origenes vpon Mat. expounding these words: This is my body, sayeth Panis iste quem Christus corpus suum fatetur esse, verbum est nutritorium animarum. i. The bread which Christ confesseth to be hys body, is a nutritiue worde of our soules. MarginaliaAugust. in Sermone.Augustinus: Nulli aliquatenus, dubitandum, vnumquemquc fidelium corporis & sanguinis Domini tunc esse participem, quando in baptismate membrum efficitur Christi. Sacramenti quippe illius participatione ac beneficio non priuabitur, quando in se hoc inuenit quod Sacramentū significat. No manne ought in any wise to doubt but that euery faithfull man is then partaker of the body and bloud of the Lord, when in Baptisme he is made a member of Christ. For he shall not be depriued of the participation and benefite of that Sacrament, when he findeth in himselfe that thing which the Sacrament doeth signifie. MarginaliaAmbrosius.Ambrosius: Tanta est vis verbi, vt panis & vinum maneant quæ sunt, & mutētur in aliud. Such is the force & strength of the worde, that the bread and wine remaine the same as they were, and yet are changed into an other thing. For it is not any longer common breade, but it is turned into a Sacrament: Yet notwithstanding there remaineth bread and wine. MarginaliaTertullianus contra Martion.Tertullian wryting against an hereticke named Martion, which taught that the creatures of God, as flesh, bread, wine and such like were naught and vncleanly: Non abiecit Deus creaturam suam, sed ea repræsentauit corpus suum. God hath not cast away his creature, but by it hee hath represented his body. MarginaliaOrigines in Leuit.Origenes vppon Leuiticus, speaking of the drinking of Christes bloud, sayeth: Non sanguinem carnis expetimus sed sanguinem verbi. We doe not desire þe bloud of the flesh, but the bloud of the woorde. Ambrose called the Sacrament, MarginaliaTypus. Antityphon.Typum corporis Christi, and Basilius Antitypum, whych is as much to say, as a token, a figure, a remēbrance and example of Christes body. MarginaliaOrigen super Matth. Cap. 14.Origine vpon the 14. chapt. of Mathew: In isto pane, quod est materiale eijcitur in secessum: id autem quod fit per verbum Dei pro fidei ratione prodest. In thys bread that thing which is materiall, passeth throughe mans body: but that which is made by the woord of God, by the meanes of faith doth profite. And least perhaps you thinke that hee spake those woordes of our common table bread, he concludeth the matter himselfe with these words: Hæc diximus de pane symbolico: These things we haue spoken of the mysticall bread. MarginaliaAugustinus contra aduersarium legis & Prophetarum.Augustinus contra aduersarium legis & Prophetatum, declareth that it must needes be a figure and a remembraunce of the body of Christ: Ista secundum sanæ fidei regulam figuratè intelliguntur. Nam alioqui horribilius videtur esse humanam carnem vorare quam perimere, & humanum sanguinem potare quàm fundere. These things are vnderstanded figuratiuely, according to the rule of sound and true faith. For otherwise it seemeth to be more horrible to eate mannes flesh, then to kill a man, and more horrible to drinke mannes bloud, then to shed it. And therfore he saith vpon the 98. Psalme: MarginaliaAugust. in Psal. 98.Non hoc corpus quod videtis estis manducaturi, nec bibituri sanguinem quem fundent qui me crucifigent. Sacramentum aliquod vobis trado. i. Ye shall not eat this body which you see, and drinke that bloud which they shal shed that shall crucifie me: I commend vnto you a Sacrament. MarginaliaTertullianus.Tertullian: Aliud a pane corpus Iesus habet: nec pro nobis panis traditus, sed ipsum Christi verum corpus traditum est in crucem, quod panis figura in cœna exhibitium est. i. Iesus hath an other body then breade, for breade was not geuen for vs, but the very true body of Christ was geuen vppon the crosse, which body was exhibited in the Supper vnder the figure of bread.

[Back to Top]

This recordeth MarginaliaTheodoretus.Theodoretus an auncient wryter, and auoweth that there is no turning or altering of the bread in the Sacrament. His woordes are these: Symbola visibilia corporis & sanguinis, sui appellatione honorauit, non mutans naturam sed naturæ addens gratiam. i. He hath honoured and dignified the visible signes wyth the name of his body and of his bloud, not changing the nature, but adding grace to nature. And in an other place, where hee maketh a true Christian man to reason with an heretike, he geueth to the hereticke this part, to holde with the turning of breade and wine into the natural body and bloud of Christ. The heretickes wordes are these: Sacramentum Dominici corporis & sanguinis, alia sunt ante sacram inuocationē: post inuocationemverò mutantur, & alia fiunt. The sacramentes of the Lordes body and bloude before the holy inuocation are one thing, but after inuocation they are changed and made an other. This maketh Theodor. to be the heretikes part. Then bringeth he foorth the true Christian man, which reprooueth the hereticke for so saying: Incidisti in laqueos quos ipse struxeras: Ne& enim sancta illa symbola post consecrationem discedunt a natura sua: Manent enim in priori & substantia, & figura, etenim & oculis videri & digitis palpari vt ante possunt. Thou art fallen into the snares which thou thy selfe hast laid. For those selfe same holy signes after this consecration, do not go frō their nature, for they abide still both in their former substance and figure, and may be both with eyes seene and felt wyth handes, as before. To the same agreeth well MarginaliaChrisostomus.Chrysostome, saying, Postquam sanctificatur panis, non amplius appellatur panis, tametsimaneat natura panis. i. After the breade is sanctified, it is called breade no more, althoughe the nature of bread stil remaine. Hereby you may vnderstand, how & in what sort the old fathers, how the primatiue and beginning church, how the Apostles, howe Christ himselfe tooke these wordes: This is my body.

[Back to Top]

Now to withstand and stoutly to go against, not onely ancient wryters, or the congregation  

Commentary   *   Close

'Congregation': a word much in vogue among sixteenth-century English Protestants and some Catholics, in particular authors and translators. It replaced 'Church', and usually possessed the connotation of a smaller, non-hierarchical body in contrast to the institutional, international Church of Rome.

of Christian people, which at that time was not ouergrown, no neither spotted with couetousnesse and worldly honour, but the Apostles also, and God himselfe, no doubt it is great fondnesse. But what speake I of the olde fathers? It is not long since the sacrament grew out of his right vnderstanding. MarginaliaTransubstantiation a new inuention.For thys word Transubstantiatio,  
Commentary   *   Close

Transubstantiation. Verity makes the argument that word lacks antiquity, therefore the doctrine it represents is novel. Catholics would respond that words such as 'Trinity' and 'Consubstantial' were created in the Fourth Century to more clearly define the most ancient and fundamental beliefs of the Church, which had come under significant question for the first time after the end of the Roman persecution. Likewise Transubstantiation was created to clarify a long-held belief within the Church which had only recently come under question in the twelfth century.

[Back to Top]
wherby they signifie turning of the breade into the body of Christ, was neuer neyther spoken, neither heard, neither thought among þe auncient fathers, or in the olde Churche. But aboue 900. yeares past, Pope Nicolas 2. in a Councell holden at Lateranum in Rome, confirmed that opinon of the changing of bread, & woulde haue made an article of the faith, and placed it in the Credo. After whiche time ensued Corus Christi daye, Masses of Corpus Christi, reseruation of the sacrament, with honoure, with canapies, with sensing, wt kneeling, wyth worshypping and adoration, and with so much as any man coulde deuise.  
Commentary   *   Close

The traditions of reservation of the Sacrament, the use of incense, kneeling and adoration of the Host both during and outside Mass were ancient traditions of the Church long before the institution of the Feast of Corpus Christi and votive masses (masses which gave particular honor to an aspect of Catholic devotion through the collects, scripture readings and hymns used).

[Back to Top]
For they thought they could not do to much to hym after that the Bishoppe of Rome had allowed hym for a God. But not fully 200. yeare before that time, when thys doctrine first began to bud, and yet notwithstandinge had not so preuailed, but that a greate number of learned and good men could know the Sacrament to be a Sacrament, and not himselfe: Charles the great king of Fraunce, and Emperour of Rome demaunded of a great learned man, whose name was Bertramus,MarginaliaCarolus Magnus Bertramus. what hee thoughte by that straunge kinde of calling downe Christe from heauen, and turning a litle gobbet of bread into his naturall body. To whom Bertram made answere in this wise: Dicimus quòd multa differentia separantur corpus in quo passus est Christus & sanguis quem in cruce pendens fudit, & hoc corpus quod in mysterio passionis Christi quotidie a fidelibus celebratur. Etenim hoc corpus pignus & species est, illud autem ipsa veritas. Apparet ergo quod tam multa differētia separentur, quantum est inter pignus & eam rem pro qua pignus traditur, & quantum inter imaginem, & rem eam cuius imago est, & quantum inter speciem & veritatem. This wee say, that there is a great difference and separation betwixt the body in the which Christe suffered, and the bloud which he shed vpon the Crosse, & thys body which euery day is celebrated in the mysterie of the Passion of Christe. For this body is a pledge and a similitude, but the other is the very truthe it selfe. Ergo, it appeareth that these two are seperated a sunder by no lesse difference, then is betweene a pledge, and the thing whereof þe pledge is geuen, or then is betweene an Image of a thing and the thing it selfe whereof the Image is, or then is betwene the forme of a thing and the veritie it selfe. MarginaliaBertramus. Ioan. Scotus Druthmarus.This wrote Bertramus, Druthmarus & manye other, and yet were neuer in all their time once reprooued of heresie. Thys wrote Iohannes Scotus also, in whose life time men had not eies to espie his heresies. MarginaliaBertramus condemned for an hereticke 200. yeares after his death.But about 200. yeare after his death, he was iudged and condemned for an hereticke, & his bookes burned in a Councell holden at Vercellæ in Lombardie, in the yeare of our Lorde God, 1015. Since which time euen vntill this day although Idolatrye had great encrease, yet there neuer wanted some good men whiche boldly woulde professe and sette foorth the truth, although they were well assured that theyr worldly reward shoulde be spite, malice, imprisonning, sworde, fire, and all kindes of tormentes. Thus so shortly, and in so few woordes as I could, I haue declared to you what Christe meant by these woordes: This is my bodye, what the Apostles thought therein, & in what sorte they deliuered them to theyr successors, in what sense and meaning the holy Fathers and olde wryters, and the Vniuersall and Catholicke Churche  
Commentary   *   Close

Protestants attempted to claim the title of 'Universal' or 'Catholic', but Roman Catholics would respond that Protestant teachings could not be found in much of Christendom, and that they virulently disagreed amongst themselves about such fundamental doctrines as Christ's presence in the Eucharist.

hath euermore taken them.

[Back to Top]
The
IIIi.iij.